Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean pro

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause

Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause

Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause

Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause

Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...