Guest guest Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 Paxil Heart Defect Warning Lawsuit torpedoed - failure to warn does not mean proximate cause Judge: Dead Doctor Torpedoes Paxil Heart Defect Warning LawsuitLexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Drugs & Devices Legal NewsPHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania judge on Jan. 12 issued an opinion denying reconsideration of summary judgment to GlaxoKline PLC (GSK) in a Paxil heart defect case because without the testimony of the deceased prescribing physician, the plaintiff was unable to prove that a better warning would have changed his decision to prescribe the drug ( Carolina Blyth, et al. v. GlaxoKline LLC, No. 070902205, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.; See 12/16/10, Page 21). Full story on lexis.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.