Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? GoldBerkeley, CA " ...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows. " Shakespeare On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 <jeremybryce1953@...> wrote: The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 Good point . Certainly if two doctors decided you lacked capacity, you would be given ECT ...............but how many people are actually considered to lack capacity? > > But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if > two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? > > Gold > Berkeley, CA > > " ...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows. " Shakespeare > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 > jeremybryce1953@...wrote: > > The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to > > have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 Good point . Certainly if two doctors decided you lacked capacity, you would be given ECT ...............but how many people are actually considered to lack capacity? > > But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if > two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? > > Gold > Berkeley, CA > > " ...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows. " Shakespeare > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 > jeremybryce1953@...wrote: > > The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to > > have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 Good point . Certainly if two doctors decided you lacked capacity, you would be given ECT ...............but how many people are actually considered to lack capacity? > > But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if > two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? > > Gold > Berkeley, CA > > " ...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows. " Shakespeare > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 > jeremybryce1953@...wrote: > > The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to > > have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 Good point . Certainly if two doctors decided you lacked capacity, you would be given ECT ...............but how many people are actually considered to lack capacity? > > But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if > two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? > > Gold > Berkeley, CA > > " ...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows. " Shakespeare > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 > jeremybryce1953@...wrote: > > The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to > > have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Yes, who decides? The very doctors who failed the patient that's who. beat down a person with drugs and then they are capable of making an informed decision? Especially with depression, people who are that beaten down tend to not care at the moment or even hope for an end? At least it is a possibility and so should not be allowed at all. Leaving someone alone should be first and the most respectful thing especially with a treatment that has NEVER been tested for safety. On 3/25/2011 9:25 PM, Gold wrote: But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? Gold Berkeley, CA "...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows." Shakespeare On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 <jeremybryce1953@...> wrote: The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Yes, who decides? The very doctors who failed the patient that's who. beat down a person with drugs and then they are capable of making an informed decision? Especially with depression, people who are that beaten down tend to not care at the moment or even hope for an end? At least it is a possibility and so should not be allowed at all. Leaving someone alone should be first and the most respectful thing especially with a treatment that has NEVER been tested for safety. On 3/25/2011 9:25 PM, Gold wrote: But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? Gold Berkeley, CA "...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows." Shakespeare On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 <jeremybryce1953@...> wrote: The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Yes, who decides? The very doctors who failed the patient that's who. beat down a person with drugs and then they are capable of making an informed decision? Especially with depression, people who are that beaten down tend to not care at the moment or even hope for an end? At least it is a possibility and so should not be allowed at all. Leaving someone alone should be first and the most respectful thing especially with a treatment that has NEVER been tested for safety. On 3/25/2011 9:25 PM, Gold wrote: But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? Gold Berkeley, CA "...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows." Shakespeare On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 <jeremybryce1953@...> wrote: The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Yes, who decides? The very doctors who failed the patient that's who. beat down a person with drugs and then they are capable of making an informed decision? Especially with depression, people who are that beaten down tend to not care at the moment or even hope for an end? At least it is a possibility and so should not be allowed at all. Leaving someone alone should be first and the most respectful thing especially with a treatment that has NEVER been tested for safety. On 3/25/2011 9:25 PM, Gold wrote: But what constitutes 'the capacity to make such an informed choice?' What if two doctors decide patient A doesn't have the capacity? Gold Berkeley, CA "...misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows." Shakespeare On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, jeremy9282 <jeremybryce1953@...> wrote: The College of Psychiatry supports the right of any patient to refuse to have ECT if they have the capacity to make such an informed choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.