Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Dr. Breeding on ECT

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dr. Breeding on ECT

By Dr. Breeding

Dr. Breeding presented to the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration Neurological Devices Panel examining the

reclassification of electroconvulsive therapy

(ECT) devices on January 27, 2011. These are his remarks as

published in the public record of the meeting.

My name is Breeding. I’ve been a Texas psychologist for

almost 30 years, and I’m a founding member of the Coalition for

the Abolition of Electroshock in Texas. I’ve been active for 20

years in efforts to abolish or at least limit the use of

electroshock because of its severe danger and lack of efficacy.

Although we narrowly failed to accomplish a total ban on

electroshock in Texas, the procedure is banned for children under

age 16 and extra safeguards are in place for the elderly. In Texas

at least, we know that electroshock is dangerous, and electroshock

machines are very dangerous. So, of course, I’m strongly against

the reclassification of the machines.

Two very experienced neurologists submitted written testimony but

could not be here today. Dr. Friedberg is the author of Shock

Treatment is Not Good for Your Brain. Here’s what he said. “The

intentional induction of convulsions should be abolished. In my

entire career, I never met an epileptic who benefited from their

seizures. I never had a patient tell me a seizure leaves them

feeling happier.

ECT causes memory

loss in all cases, dramatic damage in some.”

I completely agree with Dr. Friedberg. I’ve seen the research

showing brain damage and memory loss, and I’ve sat with the

victims of electroshock. I’ve witnessed their profound losses and

disabilities. I personally know at least three people who have

permanent seizure disorders now as a result of electroshock,

including Loper (ph.) who is one of the women

I left in Charlotte. I know many more who are unable to work and

on permanent disability. The other woman I left there,

Scogin, is unable to work as a teacher because of her

disabilities.

As a psychologist, I appreciate also what Dr. Fred Baughman had

to say. “Throughout the more than three decades of my neurological

practice, I have encountered patients treated with ECT who had

permanent erasures of their memory. Psychiatrists may wish to call

ECT therapeutic, but it never achieves anything but to diminish

adaptability in the broadest sense and cannot be called

therapeutic or medically justifiable.”

That my own mental health profession systematically inflicts

brain damage is a shame and a disgrace, that women like

Scogin and Loper strove to get here today is an incredible

testament to their resilient spirit.

Anyone who is serious about evaluating electroshock needs to read

this book, Doctors of Deception, What They Don’t Want You To Know

about Shock Treatment, by researcher and electroshock survivor,

Andre. It’s the best up-to-date document on shock and makes

it clear that the reason we’re even having this conversation today

is a victory of public relations over science.

The science is clear about the basic questions of risk and

benefit. Electroshock is not safe. It is extremely dangerous. It

always causes brain damage. The most obvious evidence of this is

memory loss. It sometimes causes death. While the American

Psychiatric Association argues that electroshock deaths are rare,

one study published in 1993 reported 10 deaths among 37 patients

80 and older who underwent electroshock. In the mid 1990s, the

Texas Department of Mental Health and Retardation reported 21

deaths among an estimated 2,000 patients who were electroshocked.

In Texas, we’re clear that these machines are dangerous.

The electroshock machine industry has consistently ignored FDA

requirements for evidence on the safety and efficacy of their

machines. I suppose it is a political question as to why your

agency has consistently refused to apply the law and hold the

industry accountable. For now, I urge you to do the right thing

and leave these brain-damaging machines in the high risk category.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dr. Breeding on ECT

By Dr. Breeding

Dr. Breeding presented to the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration Neurological Devices Panel examining the

reclassification of electroconvulsive therapy

(ECT) devices on January 27, 2011. These are his remarks as

published in the public record of the meeting.

My name is Breeding. I’ve been a Texas psychologist for

almost 30 years, and I’m a founding member of the Coalition for

the Abolition of Electroshock in Texas. I’ve been active for 20

years in efforts to abolish or at least limit the use of

electroshock because of its severe danger and lack of efficacy.

Although we narrowly failed to accomplish a total ban on

electroshock in Texas, the procedure is banned for children under

age 16 and extra safeguards are in place for the elderly. In Texas

at least, we know that electroshock is dangerous, and electroshock

machines are very dangerous. So, of course, I’m strongly against

the reclassification of the machines.

Two very experienced neurologists submitted written testimony but

could not be here today. Dr. Friedberg is the author of Shock

Treatment is Not Good for Your Brain. Here’s what he said. “The

intentional induction of convulsions should be abolished. In my

entire career, I never met an epileptic who benefited from their

seizures. I never had a patient tell me a seizure leaves them

feeling happier.

ECT causes memory

loss in all cases, dramatic damage in some.”

I completely agree with Dr. Friedberg. I’ve seen the research

showing brain damage and memory loss, and I’ve sat with the

victims of electroshock. I’ve witnessed their profound losses and

disabilities. I personally know at least three people who have

permanent seizure disorders now as a result of electroshock,

including Loper (ph.) who is one of the women

I left in Charlotte. I know many more who are unable to work and

on permanent disability. The other woman I left there,

Scogin, is unable to work as a teacher because of her

disabilities.

As a psychologist, I appreciate also what Dr. Fred Baughman had

to say. “Throughout the more than three decades of my neurological

practice, I have encountered patients treated with ECT who had

permanent erasures of their memory. Psychiatrists may wish to call

ECT therapeutic, but it never achieves anything but to diminish

adaptability in the broadest sense and cannot be called

therapeutic or medically justifiable.”

That my own mental health profession systematically inflicts

brain damage is a shame and a disgrace, that women like

Scogin and Loper strove to get here today is an incredible

testament to their resilient spirit.

Anyone who is serious about evaluating electroshock needs to read

this book, Doctors of Deception, What They Don’t Want You To Know

about Shock Treatment, by researcher and electroshock survivor,

Andre. It’s the best up-to-date document on shock and makes

it clear that the reason we’re even having this conversation today

is a victory of public relations over science.

The science is clear about the basic questions of risk and

benefit. Electroshock is not safe. It is extremely dangerous. It

always causes brain damage. The most obvious evidence of this is

memory loss. It sometimes causes death. While the American

Psychiatric Association argues that electroshock deaths are rare,

one study published in 1993 reported 10 deaths among 37 patients

80 and older who underwent electroshock. In the mid 1990s, the

Texas Department of Mental Health and Retardation reported 21

deaths among an estimated 2,000 patients who were electroshocked.

In Texas, we’re clear that these machines are dangerous.

The electroshock machine industry has consistently ignored FDA

requirements for evidence on the safety and efficacy of their

machines. I suppose it is a political question as to why your

agency has consistently refused to apply the law and hold the

industry accountable. For now, I urge you to do the right thing

and leave these brain-damaging machines in the high risk category.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dr. Breeding on ECT

By Dr. Breeding

Dr. Breeding presented to the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration Neurological Devices Panel examining the

reclassification of electroconvulsive therapy

(ECT) devices on January 27, 2011. These are his remarks as

published in the public record of the meeting.

My name is Breeding. I’ve been a Texas psychologist for

almost 30 years, and I’m a founding member of the Coalition for

the Abolition of Electroshock in Texas. I’ve been active for 20

years in efforts to abolish or at least limit the use of

electroshock because of its severe danger and lack of efficacy.

Although we narrowly failed to accomplish a total ban on

electroshock in Texas, the procedure is banned for children under

age 16 and extra safeguards are in place for the elderly. In Texas

at least, we know that electroshock is dangerous, and electroshock

machines are very dangerous. So, of course, I’m strongly against

the reclassification of the machines.

Two very experienced neurologists submitted written testimony but

could not be here today. Dr. Friedberg is the author of Shock

Treatment is Not Good for Your Brain. Here’s what he said. “The

intentional induction of convulsions should be abolished. In my

entire career, I never met an epileptic who benefited from their

seizures. I never had a patient tell me a seizure leaves them

feeling happier.

ECT causes memory

loss in all cases, dramatic damage in some.”

I completely agree with Dr. Friedberg. I’ve seen the research

showing brain damage and memory loss, and I’ve sat with the

victims of electroshock. I’ve witnessed their profound losses and

disabilities. I personally know at least three people who have

permanent seizure disorders now as a result of electroshock,

including Loper (ph.) who is one of the women

I left in Charlotte. I know many more who are unable to work and

on permanent disability. The other woman I left there,

Scogin, is unable to work as a teacher because of her

disabilities.

As a psychologist, I appreciate also what Dr. Fred Baughman had

to say. “Throughout the more than three decades of my neurological

practice, I have encountered patients treated with ECT who had

permanent erasures of their memory. Psychiatrists may wish to call

ECT therapeutic, but it never achieves anything but to diminish

adaptability in the broadest sense and cannot be called

therapeutic or medically justifiable.”

That my own mental health profession systematically inflicts

brain damage is a shame and a disgrace, that women like

Scogin and Loper strove to get here today is an incredible

testament to their resilient spirit.

Anyone who is serious about evaluating electroshock needs to read

this book, Doctors of Deception, What They Don’t Want You To Know

about Shock Treatment, by researcher and electroshock survivor,

Andre. It’s the best up-to-date document on shock and makes

it clear that the reason we’re even having this conversation today

is a victory of public relations over science.

The science is clear about the basic questions of risk and

benefit. Electroshock is not safe. It is extremely dangerous. It

always causes brain damage. The most obvious evidence of this is

memory loss. It sometimes causes death. While the American

Psychiatric Association argues that electroshock deaths are rare,

one study published in 1993 reported 10 deaths among 37 patients

80 and older who underwent electroshock. In the mid 1990s, the

Texas Department of Mental Health and Retardation reported 21

deaths among an estimated 2,000 patients who were electroshocked.

In Texas, we’re clear that these machines are dangerous.

The electroshock machine industry has consistently ignored FDA

requirements for evidence on the safety and efficacy of their

machines. I suppose it is a political question as to why your

agency has consistently refused to apply the law and hold the

industry accountable. For now, I urge you to do the right thing

and leave these brain-damaging machines in the high risk category.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dr. Breeding on ECT

By Dr. Breeding

Dr. Breeding presented to the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration Neurological Devices Panel examining the

reclassification of electroconvulsive therapy

(ECT) devices on January 27, 2011. These are his remarks as

published in the public record of the meeting.

My name is Breeding. I’ve been a Texas psychologist for

almost 30 years, and I’m a founding member of the Coalition for

the Abolition of Electroshock in Texas. I’ve been active for 20

years in efforts to abolish or at least limit the use of

electroshock because of its severe danger and lack of efficacy.

Although we narrowly failed to accomplish a total ban on

electroshock in Texas, the procedure is banned for children under

age 16 and extra safeguards are in place for the elderly. In Texas

at least, we know that electroshock is dangerous, and electroshock

machines are very dangerous. So, of course, I’m strongly against

the reclassification of the machines.

Two very experienced neurologists submitted written testimony but

could not be here today. Dr. Friedberg is the author of Shock

Treatment is Not Good for Your Brain. Here’s what he said. “The

intentional induction of convulsions should be abolished. In my

entire career, I never met an epileptic who benefited from their

seizures. I never had a patient tell me a seizure leaves them

feeling happier.

ECT causes memory

loss in all cases, dramatic damage in some.”

I completely agree with Dr. Friedberg. I’ve seen the research

showing brain damage and memory loss, and I’ve sat with the

victims of electroshock. I’ve witnessed their profound losses and

disabilities. I personally know at least three people who have

permanent seizure disorders now as a result of electroshock,

including Loper (ph.) who is one of the women

I left in Charlotte. I know many more who are unable to work and

on permanent disability. The other woman I left there,

Scogin, is unable to work as a teacher because of her

disabilities.

As a psychologist, I appreciate also what Dr. Fred Baughman had

to say. “Throughout the more than three decades of my neurological

practice, I have encountered patients treated with ECT who had

permanent erasures of their memory. Psychiatrists may wish to call

ECT therapeutic, but it never achieves anything but to diminish

adaptability in the broadest sense and cannot be called

therapeutic or medically justifiable.”

That my own mental health profession systematically inflicts

brain damage is a shame and a disgrace, that women like

Scogin and Loper strove to get here today is an incredible

testament to their resilient spirit.

Anyone who is serious about evaluating electroshock needs to read

this book, Doctors of Deception, What They Don’t Want You To Know

about Shock Treatment, by researcher and electroshock survivor,

Andre. It’s the best up-to-date document on shock and makes

it clear that the reason we’re even having this conversation today

is a victory of public relations over science.

The science is clear about the basic questions of risk and

benefit. Electroshock is not safe. It is extremely dangerous. It

always causes brain damage. The most obvious evidence of this is

memory loss. It sometimes causes death. While the American

Psychiatric Association argues that electroshock deaths are rare,

one study published in 1993 reported 10 deaths among 37 patients

80 and older who underwent electroshock. In the mid 1990s, the

Texas Department of Mental Health and Retardation reported 21

deaths among an estimated 2,000 patients who were electroshocked.

In Texas, we’re clear that these machines are dangerous.

The electroshock machine industry has consistently ignored FDA

requirements for evidence on the safety and efficacy of their

machines. I suppose it is a political question as to why your

agency has consistently refused to apply the law and hold the

industry accountable. For now, I urge you to do the right thing

and leave these brain-damaging machines in the high risk category.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...