Oliver Sacks on overmedication with psychiatric drugs - Surviving Antidepressants

[Guest guest]

http://bit.ly/pj7Npx

Surviving Antidepressants

»

« Back to In the media

Oliver Sacks on overmedication with psychiatric drugs

Altostrata

23 July 2011 - 11:28 AM

On antidepressant-induced emotional blunting: " The question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there. "

It appears he would much prefer exposing patients to music therapy.

Called the " poet laureate of medicine, " Dr. Sacks is one of our wiser, more

compassionate brain researchers and, if you've read his books or articles on

rare neurological disorders, a heck of a good writer. He is Professor of

Neurology & Psychiatry, Columbia University.

Oliver Sacks on Manipulating the Brain

(See the video interview recorded Sep 4, 2008 at

http://bigthink.com/ideas/11840)

Question: Is it possible to change the brain with medication?

Oliver Sacks: From what I read, I think that’s all sorts of changes, at least

temporary changes may be possible. One can certainly get states of calm and

alter the brain rhythms and have states of trance.

Whether they’re permanent changes, I don’t know. But any learning experience

changes the brain and nothing more, incidentally, than musical learning, so that

the brains of musicians are visibly different and even grossly different from

the brains of other people.

Question: Are you a proponent of art therapy?

Oliver Sacks: Yeah. Very, very strongly.

Most of my own work is with elderly people with neurological problems of one

sort or another. And I can see how their lives could be transformed by music and

sometimes by poetry and art.

But, say, people with Parkinson’s may be unable to move or speak unless

there’s music. People who have Alzheimer’s are confused and lost and

agitated or disoriented, can be focused wonderfully sometimes by familiar music,

which will give them a link to the past and to their own memories which they

can’t access in any other way.

And sometimes people who are aphasic and have lost the power of language can get

it back through music.

.....I think that music and other forms of art need to be in a central part of

education. This is an essential part of being human.

And although I wouldn’t locate everything in the right hemisphere, we are not

calculating machines. We need the arts as much as we need everything else.

Question: Is it possible to enhance your mental abilities by listening to

Mozart?

Oliver Sacks: Well, this so called " Mozart effect " was described, actually, in a

very modest way about 15 years ago and then got taken up by the media and hyped

and exaggerated in a way which was rather embarrassing to the original

describers.

I think there’s very little to suggest that, although Mozart as background

will make any difference, on the other hand, real engagement with music, and

especially performing music, or listening attentively, can make a great deal of

difference.

And especially early in life. You’d see this in people, say, who do Suzuki

training. And one a year of Suzuki training can not only enhance one's

musicality and alter the brain quite visibly, but the effect seems to leak over

to some extent into forms of visual thinking and logical thinking, pattern

recognition, and so forth.

So, a little musical background is not enough, but real musical engagement, I

think, can be very important.

Question: Are we living in an over-medicated world?

Oliver Sacks: [sigmund] Freud made a point, say, of distinguishing neurotic

misery and depression from what he called common unhappiness. If the common

unhappiness is what we all feel when we grieve, when we lose people, when things

go wrong.

Prozac has been and can be a life saver for people who are pathologically

depressed. Depression is the main cause of suicide, and anti-depressants of all

sorts have been very crucial. There are many different sorts, and so Prozac

belongs to a particular sort.

But there’s all the difference in the world, having a medication for a

pathological state and something which you want to enhance normal living. This

becomes a huge issue, whether it’s steroids with athletes or whatever.

If Prozac can produce a bland, nonchalant state, the question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there.

It sometimes seems as if childhood itself is being, it becomes the diagnosis,

becomes a disease. Hundreds of thousands of children, I think, are probably

improperly diagnosed as hyper-active or as having attention disorder of one sort

or another, and are put on the amphetamines or Ritalin.

And I think there do exist genuine forms of attention hyper-activity disorder

which, which may need medication. But I think, these are pretty rare. And I

suspect that 9 out of 10 kids who were diagnosed as having this do not have any

such syndrome, but are reacting to situations at school or it’s a normal stage

of development.

Kids are impulsive. This is the nature of youth. It’s one of the wonders of

youth. It’s one of the things one needs to keep all through life.

I think there are real dangers of over medicating children and of us all over

medicating ourselves. And it may not stop with over medicating. Because sooner

or later, we’d be able to have our genes altered or to have computer chips put

in our brain. And the whole business of “an enhanced existence†as opposed

to a natural one, is going to come up.

Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

[Guest guest]

http://bit.ly/pj7Npx

Surviving Antidepressants

»

« Back to In the media

Oliver Sacks on overmedication with psychiatric drugs

Altostrata

23 July 2011 - 11:28 AM

On antidepressant-induced emotional blunting: " The question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there. "

It appears he would much prefer exposing patients to music therapy.

Called the " poet laureate of medicine, " Dr. Sacks is one of our wiser, more

compassionate brain researchers and, if you've read his books or articles on

rare neurological disorders, a heck of a good writer. He is Professor of

Neurology & Psychiatry, Columbia University.

Oliver Sacks on Manipulating the Brain

(See the video interview recorded Sep 4, 2008 at

http://bigthink.com/ideas/11840)

Question: Is it possible to change the brain with medication?

Oliver Sacks: From what I read, I think that’s all sorts of changes, at least

temporary changes may be possible. One can certainly get states of calm and

alter the brain rhythms and have states of trance.

Whether they’re permanent changes, I don’t know. But any learning experience

changes the brain and nothing more, incidentally, than musical learning, so that

the brains of musicians are visibly different and even grossly different from

the brains of other people.

Question: Are you a proponent of art therapy?

Oliver Sacks: Yeah. Very, very strongly.

Most of my own work is with elderly people with neurological problems of one

sort or another. And I can see how their lives could be transformed by music and

sometimes by poetry and art.

But, say, people with Parkinson’s may be unable to move or speak unless

there’s music. People who have Alzheimer’s are confused and lost and

agitated or disoriented, can be focused wonderfully sometimes by familiar music,

which will give them a link to the past and to their own memories which they

can’t access in any other way.

And sometimes people who are aphasic and have lost the power of language can get

it back through music.

.....I think that music and other forms of art need to be in a central part of

education. This is an essential part of being human.

And although I wouldn’t locate everything in the right hemisphere, we are not

calculating machines. We need the arts as much as we need everything else.

Question: Is it possible to enhance your mental abilities by listening to

Mozart?

Oliver Sacks: Well, this so called " Mozart effect " was described, actually, in a

very modest way about 15 years ago and then got taken up by the media and hyped

and exaggerated in a way which was rather embarrassing to the original

describers.

I think there’s very little to suggest that, although Mozart as background

will make any difference, on the other hand, real engagement with music, and

especially performing music, or listening attentively, can make a great deal of

difference.

And especially early in life. You’d see this in people, say, who do Suzuki

training. And one a year of Suzuki training can not only enhance one's

musicality and alter the brain quite visibly, but the effect seems to leak over

to some extent into forms of visual thinking and logical thinking, pattern

recognition, and so forth.

So, a little musical background is not enough, but real musical engagement, I

think, can be very important.

Question: Are we living in an over-medicated world?

Oliver Sacks: [sigmund] Freud made a point, say, of distinguishing neurotic

misery and depression from what he called common unhappiness. If the common

unhappiness is what we all feel when we grieve, when we lose people, when things

go wrong.

Prozac has been and can be a life saver for people who are pathologically

depressed. Depression is the main cause of suicide, and anti-depressants of all

sorts have been very crucial. There are many different sorts, and so Prozac

belongs to a particular sort.

But there’s all the difference in the world, having a medication for a

pathological state and something which you want to enhance normal living. This

becomes a huge issue, whether it’s steroids with athletes or whatever.

If Prozac can produce a bland, nonchalant state, the question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there.

It sometimes seems as if childhood itself is being, it becomes the diagnosis,

becomes a disease. Hundreds of thousands of children, I think, are probably

improperly diagnosed as hyper-active or as having attention disorder of one sort

or another, and are put on the amphetamines or Ritalin.

And I think there do exist genuine forms of attention hyper-activity disorder

which, which may need medication. But I think, these are pretty rare. And I

suspect that 9 out of 10 kids who were diagnosed as having this do not have any

such syndrome, but are reacting to situations at school or it’s a normal stage

of development.

Kids are impulsive. This is the nature of youth. It’s one of the wonders of

youth. It’s one of the things one needs to keep all through life.

I think there are real dangers of over medicating children and of us all over

medicating ourselves. And it may not stop with over medicating. Because sooner

or later, we’d be able to have our genes altered or to have computer chips put

in our brain. And the whole business of “an enhanced existence†as opposed

to a natural one, is going to come up.

Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

[Guest guest]

http://bit.ly/pj7Npx

Surviving Antidepressants

»

« Back to In the media

Oliver Sacks on overmedication with psychiatric drugs

Altostrata

23 July 2011 - 11:28 AM

On antidepressant-induced emotional blunting: " The question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there. "

It appears he would much prefer exposing patients to music therapy.

Called the " poet laureate of medicine, " Dr. Sacks is one of our wiser, more

compassionate brain researchers and, if you've read his books or articles on

rare neurological disorders, a heck of a good writer. He is Professor of

Neurology & Psychiatry, Columbia University.

Oliver Sacks on Manipulating the Brain

(See the video interview recorded Sep 4, 2008 at

http://bigthink.com/ideas/11840)

Question: Is it possible to change the brain with medication?

Oliver Sacks: From what I read, I think that’s all sorts of changes, at least

temporary changes may be possible. One can certainly get states of calm and

alter the brain rhythms and have states of trance.

Whether they’re permanent changes, I don’t know. But any learning experience

changes the brain and nothing more, incidentally, than musical learning, so that

the brains of musicians are visibly different and even grossly different from

the brains of other people.

Question: Are you a proponent of art therapy?

Oliver Sacks: Yeah. Very, very strongly.

Most of my own work is with elderly people with neurological problems of one

sort or another. And I can see how their lives could be transformed by music and

sometimes by poetry and art.

But, say, people with Parkinson’s may be unable to move or speak unless

there’s music. People who have Alzheimer’s are confused and lost and

agitated or disoriented, can be focused wonderfully sometimes by familiar music,

which will give them a link to the past and to their own memories which they

can’t access in any other way.

And sometimes people who are aphasic and have lost the power of language can get

it back through music.

.....I think that music and other forms of art need to be in a central part of

education. This is an essential part of being human.

And although I wouldn’t locate everything in the right hemisphere, we are not

calculating machines. We need the arts as much as we need everything else.

Question: Is it possible to enhance your mental abilities by listening to

Mozart?

Oliver Sacks: Well, this so called " Mozart effect " was described, actually, in a

very modest way about 15 years ago and then got taken up by the media and hyped

and exaggerated in a way which was rather embarrassing to the original

describers.

I think there’s very little to suggest that, although Mozart as background

will make any difference, on the other hand, real engagement with music, and

especially performing music, or listening attentively, can make a great deal of

difference.

And especially early in life. You’d see this in people, say, who do Suzuki

training. And one a year of Suzuki training can not only enhance one's

musicality and alter the brain quite visibly, but the effect seems to leak over

to some extent into forms of visual thinking and logical thinking, pattern

recognition, and so forth.

So, a little musical background is not enough, but real musical engagement, I

think, can be very important.

Question: Are we living in an over-medicated world?

Oliver Sacks: [sigmund] Freud made a point, say, of distinguishing neurotic

misery and depression from what he called common unhappiness. If the common

unhappiness is what we all feel when we grieve, when we lose people, when things

go wrong.

Prozac has been and can be a life saver for people who are pathologically

depressed. Depression is the main cause of suicide, and anti-depressants of all

sorts have been very crucial. There are many different sorts, and so Prozac

belongs to a particular sort.

But there’s all the difference in the world, having a medication for a

pathological state and something which you want to enhance normal living. This

becomes a huge issue, whether it’s steroids with athletes or whatever.

If Prozac can produce a bland, nonchalant state, the question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there.

It sometimes seems as if childhood itself is being, it becomes the diagnosis,

becomes a disease. Hundreds of thousands of children, I think, are probably

improperly diagnosed as hyper-active or as having attention disorder of one sort

or another, and are put on the amphetamines or Ritalin.

And I think there do exist genuine forms of attention hyper-activity disorder

which, which may need medication. But I think, these are pretty rare. And I

suspect that 9 out of 10 kids who were diagnosed as having this do not have any

such syndrome, but are reacting to situations at school or it’s a normal stage

of development.

Kids are impulsive. This is the nature of youth. It’s one of the wonders of

youth. It’s one of the things one needs to keep all through life.

I think there are real dangers of over medicating children and of us all over

medicating ourselves. And it may not stop with over medicating. Because sooner

or later, we’d be able to have our genes altered or to have computer chips put

in our brain. And the whole business of “an enhanced existence†as opposed

to a natural one, is going to come up.

Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

[Guest guest]

http://bit.ly/pj7Npx

Surviving Antidepressants

»

« Back to In the media

Oliver Sacks on overmedication with psychiatric drugs

Altostrata

23 July 2011 - 11:28 AM

On antidepressant-induced emotional blunting: " The question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there. "

It appears he would much prefer exposing patients to music therapy.

Called the " poet laureate of medicine, " Dr. Sacks is one of our wiser, more

compassionate brain researchers and, if you've read his books or articles on

rare neurological disorders, a heck of a good writer. He is Professor of

Neurology & Psychiatry, Columbia University.

Oliver Sacks on Manipulating the Brain

(See the video interview recorded Sep 4, 2008 at

http://bigthink.com/ideas/11840)

Question: Is it possible to change the brain with medication?

Oliver Sacks: From what I read, I think that’s all sorts of changes, at least

temporary changes may be possible. One can certainly get states of calm and

alter the brain rhythms and have states of trance.

Whether they’re permanent changes, I don’t know. But any learning experience

changes the brain and nothing more, incidentally, than musical learning, so that

the brains of musicians are visibly different and even grossly different from

the brains of other people.

Question: Are you a proponent of art therapy?

Oliver Sacks: Yeah. Very, very strongly.

Most of my own work is with elderly people with neurological problems of one

sort or another. And I can see how their lives could be transformed by music and

sometimes by poetry and art.

But, say, people with Parkinson’s may be unable to move or speak unless

there’s music. People who have Alzheimer’s are confused and lost and

agitated or disoriented, can be focused wonderfully sometimes by familiar music,

which will give them a link to the past and to their own memories which they

can’t access in any other way.

And sometimes people who are aphasic and have lost the power of language can get

it back through music.

.....I think that music and other forms of art need to be in a central part of

education. This is an essential part of being human.

And although I wouldn’t locate everything in the right hemisphere, we are not

calculating machines. We need the arts as much as we need everything else.

Question: Is it possible to enhance your mental abilities by listening to

Mozart?

Oliver Sacks: Well, this so called " Mozart effect " was described, actually, in a

very modest way about 15 years ago and then got taken up by the media and hyped

and exaggerated in a way which was rather embarrassing to the original

describers.

I think there’s very little to suggest that, although Mozart as background

will make any difference, on the other hand, real engagement with music, and

especially performing music, or listening attentively, can make a great deal of

difference.

And especially early in life. You’d see this in people, say, who do Suzuki

training. And one a year of Suzuki training can not only enhance one's

musicality and alter the brain quite visibly, but the effect seems to leak over

to some extent into forms of visual thinking and logical thinking, pattern

recognition, and so forth.

So, a little musical background is not enough, but real musical engagement, I

think, can be very important.

Question: Are we living in an over-medicated world?

Oliver Sacks: [sigmund] Freud made a point, say, of distinguishing neurotic

misery and depression from what he called common unhappiness. If the common

unhappiness is what we all feel when we grieve, when we lose people, when things

go wrong.

Prozac has been and can be a life saver for people who are pathologically

depressed. Depression is the main cause of suicide, and anti-depressants of all

sorts have been very crucial. There are many different sorts, and so Prozac

belongs to a particular sort.

But there’s all the difference in the world, having a medication for a

pathological state and something which you want to enhance normal living. This

becomes a huge issue, whether it’s steroids with athletes or whatever.

If Prozac can produce a bland, nonchalant state, the question is whether such a

state is a good one or whether it’s morally responsible. I think one needs to

have all one’s emotional sympathies and sensitivities and vulnerabilities out

there.

It sometimes seems as if childhood itself is being, it becomes the diagnosis,

becomes a disease. Hundreds of thousands of children, I think, are probably

improperly diagnosed as hyper-active or as having attention disorder of one sort

or another, and are put on the amphetamines or Ritalin.

And I think there do exist genuine forms of attention hyper-activity disorder

which, which may need medication. But I think, these are pretty rare. And I

suspect that 9 out of 10 kids who were diagnosed as having this do not have any

such syndrome, but are reacting to situations at school or it’s a normal stage

of development.

Kids are impulsive. This is the nature of youth. It’s one of the wonders of

youth. It’s one of the things one needs to keep all through life.

I think there are real dangers of over medicating children and of us all over

medicating ourselves. And it may not stop with over medicating. Because sooner

or later, we’d be able to have our genes altered or to have computer chips put

in our brain. And the whole business of “an enhanced existence†as opposed

to a natural one, is going to come up.

Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T