10 Myths about Breast Cancer Industy...

[Guest guest]

Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed

to Know (opinion)

Sunday, October 19, 2008 by: Mike (see all articles by this author)

Key concepts: Cancer, Breast cancer and Cancer industry

http://www.naturalnews.com/024536.html

Articles Related to This Article:

• The mineral selenium proves itself as powerful anti-cancer medicine

• Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival Mechanism (Book Excerpt)

• New research shows vitamin D slashes risk of cancers by 77 percent;

cancer industry refuses to support cancer prevention

(NaturalNews) With Breast Cancer Awareness month fully upon us once

again, retail stores have been invaded with everything pink, including

" pink ribbon " candies and personal care products made with blatantly

cancer-causing ingredients. Retail grocery stores like Safeway even

hit up customers for donations at the cash register, promising to

raise funds to find " the cure for cancer. "

Consumers of course, have virtually no idea where the funds they

donate actually go, nor do they know the truths about breast cancer

they'll never be told by conventional cancer non-profit organizations.

In this article, I'll reveal ten important myths about breast cancer,

and the truths that can save your life.

Myth #1: Breast Cancer is not preventable

The Truth: Up to 98% of breast cancer cases can be prevented through

diet, nutritional supplements, sunshine and exercise

It's true: Breast cancer can be almost entirely prevented through

commonsense changes in diet, the addition of anti-cancer nutritional

supplements, boosting vitamin D creation from sunlight, avoiding

exposure to toxic chemicals in consumer products, pursuing regular

exercise and eating a live foods diet.

The breast cancer industry -- which depends on the continuation of

cancer for its profits and employment -- has so far refused to teach

women even basic cancer prevention strategies (such as increasing the

intake of vitamin D, which prevents 77% of all cancers). See:

http://www.naturalnews.com/021892.html

Myth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support

breast cancer victims.

The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast

cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm

than good.

You know where all that money goes that you donate to the " search for

the cure " and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to

actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health

Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast

cancer industry helps zero percent of women actually prevent it.

Those funds actually go to recruiting breast cancer patients by

offering " free " mammograms. This is the clever recruitment strategy of

the cancer industry. It's sort of like a greasy garage mechanic

offering a " free " checkup on your car's transmission. It's in his

financial interest to find something wrong (or to break something),

just like it's in the financial interests of the cancer industry to

diagnose a women with cancer and scare her into expensive, high-profit

treatments like chemotherapy, radiation therapy or cancer surgery.

(Mammogram false positives are commonplace...)

Want proof of where these funds go? Check out this grant list at the

Komen for the Cure organization, and you'll see it's almost entirely

spent on recruiting more women with mammograms:

http://www.komenphoenix.org/site/c.nsKZ...

When you read that list, note that there is not a single grant

provided for nutritional education to teach women how to prevent

cancer with vitamin D, cruciferous vegetables, anti-cancer herbs,

supplements or to avoid dangerous cancer-causing food ingredients like

sodium nitrite, MSG and chemical sweeteners.

Myth #3: The only proven treatments for breast cancer are chemotherapy

and radiation

The Truth: Chemotherapy doesn't work and radiation causes cancer

Chemotherapy is a fraud, plain and simple. It's as ludicrous as

poisoning patients with mercury and calling it medicine (which is

something doctors did a hundred years ago, by the way). There is

absolutely no reliable scientific evidence showing that chemotherapy

has any positive effect whatsoever on breast cancer. Try to find the

science yourself: It doesn't exist!

Sure, there's evidence that chemotherapy shrinks tumors. Too bad,

however, that tumor size is irrelevant. Artificially reducing the size

of a tumor does nothing to reverse the physiology of cancer in a

patient's body. It doesn't initiate the healing that needs to take

place to reverse cancer and stay cancer free. And this doesn't even

take into account the quality of life issues here: Chemotherapy

doesn't help people LIVE any longer, but it sure does make them DIE

longer!

Myth #4: Chemotherapy is safe and doesn't cause permanent damage to

your health

The Truth: Chemotherapy causes vomiting, hair loss, muscle loss, brain

damage, heart damage, kidney damage and liver damage. Much of this

damage is permanent. Read these stories to learn more:

Cancer Drug Causes Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/024475.html

Chemotherapy Causes Brain Shrinkage

http://www.naturalnews.com/021200.html

Chemotherapy Found to Cause Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html

Myth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancer

The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they help

Here's part of a story we published in 2006, called Breast Cancer

Screening Harms Ten Women for Every One That it Helps

(http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html)

" A new study by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Denmark

found that mammograms may harm ten times as many women as they help.

The researchers examined the benefits and negative effects of seven

breast cancer screening programs on 500,000 women in the United

States, Canada, Scotland and Sweden. The study's authors found that

for every 2,000 women who received mammograms over a 10-year period,

only one would have her life prolonged, but 10 would endure

unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments. "

Got that? For every 2,000 women receiving mammograms, only ONE would

have her life extended at all. TEN women, though, would be harmed with

chemotherapy, radiation or mastectomies.

What the study didn't point out, by the way, is that all these

treatments are highly profitable for the cancer industry. That's the

real reason why mammograms are pushed so aggressively onto women. It's

not because mammograms detect cancer; it's because mammograms make

them money.

To the breast cancer industry, a woman is nothing more than a piece of

meat with a cash reward attached to it. The push for mammography is a

marketing ploy designed to keep women scared, misinformed and lined up

to be poisoned with chemotherapy while they shell out their life

savings for treatments that, for most of them, aren't even medically

justified!

That's why I say the breast cancer industry is, by any honest

assessment, a crime against women. In America, husbands who beat their

wives are considered criminals. They're arrested and locked away. But

those very same men, when wearing a doctor's coat, can assault women

with chemicals, slice off their breasts with scalpels and even kill

those women... all with impunity. There's not a single breast cancer

doctor who has ever been arrested for the death of a patient.

The true history of western medicine's violence against women

In time, of course, this will change. Medical violence against women

is a crime, regardless of whether the weapon is a fist, a baseball bat

or a syringe full of chemicals that will cause permanent damage to her

vital organs. In time, chemotherapy will be outlawed and breast cancer

doctors will be put out of work or prosecuted for their crimes against

women. Perhaps they'll even be castrated as part of a " fitting "

punishment.

To all the women reading this, note carefully the history of western

medicine and its numerous assaults on women over the years. Do you

know where the term " hysterectomy " comes from? It comes from the

belief by male doctors that women's emotions were " hysterical, " and

they believed the best way to " cure " women of their hysteria was to

violently cut her reproductive organs out of her body.

The procedure was widely adopted by male surgeons and used for well

over a hundred years to treat women who were diagnosed as suffering

from virtually every kind of emotional variance you can imagine.

Doctors who didn't use scalpels to remove these organs from a woman's

body often resorted to so-called " pelvic massages " -- a medicalized

raping of the female patient by the male doctor, of course.

Even today, tens of thousands of hysterectomies are performed each

year with no medical justification whatsoever. Doctors continue to

view women's bodies as diseased and abnormal, surgically removing

their breasts and reproductive organs for no justifiable reason

whatsoever. It's even being done today as a cancer prevention

procedure, against women who have no cancer at all!

Western medicine's treatment of breast cancer patients today is little

more than an extension of hundreds of years of medical violence

against women by the male-dominated medical establishment.

Want proof? Notice that cancer doctors never advise men to surgically

remove their testicles as a way to " prevent " testicular cancer? That's

because the male surgeons performing these operations prefer to maim

women, not men.

If you have the stomach for it, read the rest of the truth about how

conventional doctors and surgeons commit outrageous medical violence

against women and children even today:

http://www.naturalnews.com/019930.html

Myth #6: BRCA-positive women should consider mastectomies to prevent

cancer

The Truth: Cruciferous vegetables target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes,

preventing cancer with nutrition

Women who are BRCA positive are being scared into utterly unnecessary

double mastectomies -- a procedure that benefits no one except the

surgeon. What nobody is telling these women is that cruciferous

vegetables contain anti-cancer nutrients that specifically target

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, protecting these women from breast cancer.

All it takes is a single ounce of fresh broccoli juice each day, or

fresh sprouts, superfoods or other nutrient-dense foods or juices

consumed daily.

Cancer doctors, of course, conveniently forget to tell women about

these little facts. It would hurt their business if women knew how to

prevent cancer on their own, at home, with everyday groceries and

simple herbs.

Here's text from one study that might interest you. It shows that I3C

(from broccoli) and genistein (from fermented soy) inhibit

estrogen-stimulated receptor activity in a dose-dependent fashion:

" ...we showed that I3C induces BRCA1 expression and that both I3C and

BRCA1 inhibit oestrogen (E2)-stimulated oestrogen receptor (ER-)

activity in human breast cancer cells. We now report that both I3C and

genistein induce the expression of both breast cancer susceptibility

genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) in breast (MCF-7 and T47D) and prostate

(DU-145 and LNCaP) cancer cell types, in a time- and dose-dependent

fashion.

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v94/n...

Conventional cancer doctors, of course, refuse to tell women about

scientific evidence like this. If women could prevent breast cancer

with I3C, why would they need cancer doctors? The answer, of course,

is that they wouldn't. You can buy I3C, but the way, right here:

http://www.vitacost.com/NSI-I3C-Indole-...

The FDA, of course, won't allow companies selling I3C supplements to

tell you the scientifically-validated truth about their anti-cancer

benefits. It's all part of the censorship and oppression that

characterizes today's cancer industry. The U.S. government, of course,

is the co-conspirator in this sad tragedy of misinformation.

It is the job of the FDA and the cancer industry to keep women stupid,

uninformed and scared when it comes to breast cancer. The last thing

they want is for women to be nutritionally literate.

Myth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancer

The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be

publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry

It's the great scam of the cancer industry: We're searching for a

cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they've been using this

same con since the late 60's, when they claimed to be only a few

million dollars away from curing cancer forever.

The search for " the cure " is pure deception. It's a clever con to take

money from people for all those silly pink ribbon activities, but the

truth is that the cancer industry doesn't believe there's such a thing

as cure. Just ask the FDA, the AMA or any state health licensing

board: Anyone claiming to have a cancer " cure " is immediately

considered a quack. Over the last several decades, countless doctors

researching genuine cancer cures have been arrested, imprisoned or run

out of the country. Read about Stanislaw Burzynski to learn about just

one example: http://www.cancure.org/burzynski_instit...

Finally, even if they actually find a " cure " (which they won't, since

that would destroy the profits of the cancer industry), do you think

they would give it away for free? Of course not! They'd charge

hundreds of thousands of dollars for it, milking the maximum profits

out of a terrified population for their newest wonder drug.

Notice, by the way, that not a single conventional breast cancer

non-profit group -- nor any drug company -- has announced that its

breakthrough cancer drugs will be given away for free. And that leads

me to this question: If they're not planning on giving away the cure

for free, then why are you giving them money for free to pay for their

R & D?

Why should people donate money to the wealthiest corporations in the

world (the drug companies) who are going to take their money and use

it to develop a new wave of drugs that are sold to cancer victims at

outrageous price markups sometimes exceeding 550,000% of the cost of

the chemical ingredients?

The truth is, anyone who donates money for any such " search for the

cure " is being conned outright. There's a sucker born every minute,

P.T. Barnum famously said. What he neglected to add is that most of

them are now buying pink products and thinking they're helping find a

" cure " for cancer.

Don't be suckered. Keep your money, or invest it in vitamin D

supplements or anti-cancer herbs. You want to cure cancer? Cure it in

your own body first. It's a lot less expensive, and you get to keep

your hair, too.

Myth #8: There is no cure for breast cancer

The Truth: There are MANY natural cures for breast cancer available

right now

Just a few hours of research will turn up numerous natural cures for

cancer: Vitamin D, cat's claw herbs, the Essiac formula, medicinal

mushrooms, spirulina, cruciferous vegetables, green tea, graviola

herbs, Chinese medicinal herbs, oxygen therapy, alkalizing water

therapies and much more.

All these cures have one thing in common: They are ALL suppressed by

the FDA and FTC. Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods, herbs or

supplements is now a criminal offense in America.

Myth #9: If my mother had breast cancer, I'll get it too

The Truth: Breast Cancer is not caused by bad genes; it's caused by

bad diets

This is another common lie told to woman by cancer doctors to scare

them into medically unnecessary cancer " treatments " (which can kill

you or harm you). Did you know that radiation treatment for one breast

actually causes cancer in the OTHER breast? See:

http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000366_...

Your genes don't control your health, but what you put in your mouth

and on your skin has near-total control over your health! If your

parents had cancer, they were no doubt eating cancer-causing foods

(processed meats) and not using anti-cancer foods, superfoods, herbs

and supplements. They were also likely deficient in vitamin D, and

they probably didn't drink fresh anti-cancer vegetables on a daily

basis (www.JuiceFeasting.com). Lastly, they no doubt had regular

exposure to cancer-causing chemicals: Cigarette smoke, chemical

solvents, perfume chemicals, household cleaners, pesticides, skin care

products, conventional cosmetics, etc.

Read the truth about processed meats:

http://www.naturalnews.com/022288.html

Myth #10: Sunlight causes cancer

The Truth: Sunlight generates Vitamin D in your skin, which prevents

78% of ALL cancers

The disinformation put out by the cancer industry about sunlight has

reached a level of absurdity that's virtually unmatched in the history

of medicine. If you believe what the American Cancer Society tells you

(still being suckered?), sunlight causes cancer!

Yes, that's right: Sunlight causes cancer, they claim. According to

the entire cancer industry (and most dermatologists, too), you'd be

much better off hiding in a cave, or living your life under

fluorescent lights or smothered in a layer of toxic sunscreen

chemicals (which actually DO cause cancer, by the way).

Somehow, the human race has miraculously managed to survived 350,000

years of natural sunlight without be obliterated. This is nothing

short of astonishing, given that sunlight is so deadly. It sort of

makes me wonder how the human race survived at all, with sunlight

striking any given area of the Earth, say, 50% of the time. Did our

ancestors live underground?

The ploy here is so obvious that it's child's play to expose their

strategy: Cancer industry authorities know that vitamin D prevents 77%

of all cancers. Since sunlight exposure causes the skin to generate

vitamin D in the human body (for free, no less), the cancer industry

has come to the realization that in order for it to continue surviving

(and exploiting cancer patients), it has to scare people away from

anything that might actually prevent or cure cancer.

This is the whole reason behind the sunlight scare campaigns, of

course. It's all just a clever profit strategy to keep people sick and

diseased by enforcing widespread vitamin D deficiency across the human

population. Note, too, that this deficiency is especially prominent in

men and women of darker skin color, which means the cancer industry's

whole campaign against sunlight is filled with disturbing racial

overtones that smack of genocide. (Ever wonder why breast cancer is

FAR more aggressive in black women and white women? It's the vitamin D

deficiency caused by the skin color, of course. But cancer docs never

tell their black patients anything about it...)

Remember this: Healthy people with abundant vitamin D levels in their

blood don't get cancer and they almost never catch colds. They also

don't need vaccines, by the way. These are three huge profit centers

for conventional medicine: Cancer, vaccines and colds. This is why the

industry goes to such great lengths to (hilariously) try to discredit

the sun.

It's hilarious because the sun, of course, is the source of ALL life

on our planet. Without the sun, there would be no plants, no bacteria,

no animals, no fish and certainly no humans. The sun is the single

most important source of life on our planet, and without it, we'd all

die in a matter of a few hours (from the cold alone). That the cancer

industry would declare war on the sun is just a disturbing example of

how far removed modern medicine is from the real world.

Why the cancer industry is dangerous to women

The cancer industry people are living in a world of self-reinforced

fictions, where sunlight is bad and chemotherapy chemicals are good;

where food is useless but pharmaceuticals are essential. Almost

everything said to you by a conventional cancer doctor is the opposite

of what's real, and yet they believe their own delusions only because

those delusions are so widely shared by their colleagues. It is

circular logic at its worst, driven by arrogance and greed, and

totally lacking any discernable degree of intellectual honesty or

compassion for the value of a human life.

The cancer industry is, in a very real way, a danger to the safety of

men and women alike. It is a kind of home-grown medical terrorism,

through which the application of fear and disinformation results in

massive corporate profits that are only exceeded by the body count of

our dead women; our mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts and nieces who

fall victim to conventional cancer treatments. They are being lost to

a medical regime wielding weapons of mass destruction: Chemical

weapons (chemotherapy), radiological weapons (radiation) and weapons

of sharp steel (scalpels).

These weapons of medical violence are being directed at our women for

one purpose only: To secure profits that go into the hands of a few

wealthy men who sit at the top of these organizations, raking in

fifty-million-dollar salaries while the cancer treatment centers send

women home in body bags.

It is the ultimate act of cruelty to promise a woman " treatment " and

then deliver poison.

It is the ultimate act of violence to promise a woman " healing " and

then mutilate her body.

The cancer industry, as operated today, is ultimately a criminal

organization engaged in acts of medical violence against women.

Why women should revolt against the cancer industry

Even worse, it is being staffed by women, cheered by women and

supported by women. In World War II, before the Jews were

exterminated, Nazi soldiers pried the gold fillings out of their

mouths. The fillings were sold off, and the money went to two places:

The pockets of the top Nazi commanders, and the continued funding of

the prison camps and extermination chambers. The Jewish prisoners, in

other words, paid for their own gas chamber treatments using the gold

right out of their own mouths.

Today, women are paying for their own cancer industry chemical

assaults using the dollars right out of their own pockets. Those who

support the conventional breast cancer non-profits are feeding the

very beast that may someday destroy them and send them home poisoned,

emaciated, or mutilated beyond repair.

And you know what the pink ribbon non-profits will do to help these

women? WIGS. They'll give them wigs to cover their hairless heads.

Chemotherapy victim or concentration camp prisoner? They both produce

these same results. Zyklon B gas, by the way, was manufactured by a

pharmaceutical company.

It is no coincidence that women who receive chemotherapy visually

resemble the women of the Nazi concentration camps. They become

emaciated through dangerous losses of muscle mass and bone mass. They

lose their hair, vomit their food and suffer the devastating effects

of massive nutrient loss.

They are, in effect, both prisoners of the same system of control and

violence against women. It is a system that has existed for thousands

of years, taking on new names and new faces as it shifts from one

corner of the planet to another.

Today, that system of abuse and violence against women has a corporate

logo, a cute pink symbol and a clever slogan. It has hundreds of

offices all across the country, and thousands of pink products in

retail stores. It is a system of violence against women, painted pink

and repackaged as something that cares for women; and in that

disguise, aided by the purchasing dollars of gullible consumers, it is

ensnaring women in a system of such great evil that it can only be

accurately compared to historical events like the Holocaust.

May God save our women from the cancer industry, lest we lose four

generations to this modern chemical holocaust that has been unleashed

against our mothers, daughters, grandmothers and sisters. And if our

government will not protect us from this home-grown terrorism that

seeks to turn the bodies of women into corporate profit centers, I

hope that the People of America will one day wake up and take all

justified (non-violent) measures to protect themselves from the cancer

industry.

It is odd, I think, that women will protest in front of abortion

clinics in order to save the life of an unborn child, and yet that

same woman will say nothing when a cancer doctor destroys the life of

her own mother or daughter. It is time to start protesting the cancer

clinics and cancer non-profits. It is time to end this chemical

holocaust and this medical violence against women. The women should be

marching against mammograms and chemotherapy, demanding the arrest and

prosecution of cancer surgeons who perform unjustified double

mastectomies.

Throughout history, women have fought hard for the right to vote, to

pursue an education and to be heard. I believe it is time that women

exercised those rights to protect their freedoms and their lives from

the conventional cancer industry.

Buzz up!3 votesBoost this article on Buzz! Click " BuzzUp! "

About the author: Mike is a natural health researcher and author

with a passion for teaching people how to improve their health He is a

prolific writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews,

reports and consumer guides, impacting the lives of millions of

readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health

benefits from reading his articles. is an independent journalist

with strong ethics who does not get paid to write articles about any

product or company. In 2007, launched EcoLEDs, a manufacturer of

mercury-free, energy-efficient LED lighting products that save

electricity and help prevent global warming. He also launched an

online retailer of environmentally-friendly products

(BetterLifeGoods.com) and uses a portion of its profits to help fund

non-profit endeavors. He's also a successful software entrepreneur,

having founded a well known email marketing software company whose

technology currently powers the NaturalNews email newsletters.

also serves as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center,

a non-profit consumer protection group, and pursues hobbies such as

Pilates, Capoeira, nature macrophotography and organic gardening.