GSK solicitor claims defended against Seroxat case

[Guest guest]

Addleshaw Goddard LLPThis group has made a name for itself representing healthcare clients, particularly pharmaceutical manufacturers and medical device companies. It has earned praise for its defence of GlaxoKline in the Seroxat group litigation. The firm has a dedicated class actions team, with experts in product liability, commercial litigation, competition and insurance.

KEY INDIVIDUALS Kelleher leads the team's work on the Seroxat litigation. He is also acting for pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in a number of unitary claims involving therapeutic and diagnostic productshttp://www.chambersandpartners.com/uk/Editorial/39256

[Guest guest]

Well, apparently these guys are addled

BTW, the derivation of addled is liquid manure :0

That would make these folks s**t for brains?

Forgive me,

Jim

On 2/13/2011 10:41 AM, jeremy9282 wrote:

Addleshaw

Goddard LLPThis group has made a name for itself representing

healthcare clients, particularly pharmaceutical manufacturers

and medical device companies. It has earned praise for its

defence of GlaxoKline in the Seroxat group litigation. The

firm has a dedicated class actions team, with experts in product

liability, commercial litigation, competition and insurance.

KEY INDIVIDUALS Kelleher leads the team's work on the

Seroxat litigation. He is also acting for pharmaceutical and

medical device manufacturers in a number of unitary claims

involving therapeutic and diagnostic products

http://www.chambersandpartners.com/uk/Editorial/39256

[Guest guest]

Hi Jim

addled here means confused by too much drink

but on a serious note ............from reports given to me by clients dumped by Hugh the problem here is with the way the case was brought, hence the ability of GSK to defend.

Harvey had set a course to prove that Seroxat was the worst ssri & in the end epidemiological studies by the courts expert witness showed it was not

Counsel's advice then in the face of the evidence was that the case could not be won. So Harvey withdrew.

A couple of the litigants are trying to battle on & revive legal aid funding but at present the have no solicitor.

Expert opinion also points out that the case should not have been brought against GSK in isolation & that victims might have been better served by bringing a judicial review.

The evidence shows that there is a class wide problem with SSRI ...........which is something SSRI Crusaders has said since Oct 2, 2001

> >> >> > Addleshaw Goddard LLPThis group has made a name for itself > > representing healthcare clients, particularly pharmaceutical > > manufacturers and medical device companies. It has earned praise for > > its defence of GlaxoKline in the Seroxat group litigation. The > > firm has a dedicated class actions team, with experts in product > > liability, commercial litigation, competition and insurance.> >> >> > <http://www.chambersandpartners.com/ImagesHandler.ashx?directoryId=61812>> >> >> > <http://www.goodlawyerguide.co.uk/system/bw_avatars/3119/medium/john-kelleher.jpeg?1270885596>> > KEY INDIVIDUALS Kelleher leads the team's work on the Seroxat > > litigation. He is also acting for pharmaceutical and medical device > > manufacturers in a number of unitary claims involving therapeutic and > > diagnostic products> >> > http://www.chambersandpartners.com/uk/Editorial/39256> >> >> >>