Re: Re: (Seroxat) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice

[Guest guest]

I agree completely. If the documents are there then

they need to be made public through the FOI.

I cannot believe the arguments presented to NOT

come forward with the records.

What concerns me Jim is the " vexatious " wasting of

time....................the regulator is supposed to be there for the

protection of all & in our case that means proper regulation of all

psychotropic drugs. Not just one that suits the needs of litigation

lawyers at this particular moment in time.

>

> My first response is that FOI documents are either

> there or not.

>

> With FOI requests you can sometimes get further with

> the type of thing requested, the way you request it etc.

>

> I have had way more success if I don't seem concerned

> about the request, almost bored. but I also try to get the

> documents without explicitely announcing my intentions.

>

> I have learned this the hard way, let me tell you.

>

>

> (Seroxat) Freedom of Information Act 2000

(Section 50) Decision Notice

>

>

> Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice

>

>

>

> 12 Nov 2008

> Finally the complainant queried again what is the benefit of Seroxat?

3. On 3 May 2007 the MHRA responded to the complainant's requests

labeled FOI. 07/140 and FOI 07/142. The MHRA refused the requests under

section 12 of the ...

>

>

> ICO Decision Notices - http://www.ico.gov.uk/RS!

SFeeds/DecisionNotices.aspx

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Message

>

------------------------------------