Document Emerge Proving Dr. Wakefiled Innocent; BMJ/ Deer Misrepresenting Facts

[Guest guest]

I don't suppose I'll ever be able to decide who is right, who is lying in this case. It can't be both, eh?

T.

http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr__Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html

(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Wakefield of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its reporter Deer. This new evidence "completely negates the allegations that I committed scientificfraud. Deer and Dr. Godlee of the British Medical Journal (BMJ) knew or shouldhave known about the facts set out below before publishing their false allegations," says Dr Wakefield (see sources, below).Newly-revealed documents show that on December 20th, 1996, a meeting of The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School featured a presentation by Professor - on seven of the children who would later become part of the group of patients Dr Wakefield wrote about in his 1998 The Lancet paper (which was later retracted by The Lancet).Remember, Dr Wakefield has been accused of completely fabricating his findings about these same children in his 1998 paper, but these documents reveal that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two other researchers -- Professor - and Dr Amar Dhillon -- independently documented the same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.Thus, Dr Wakefield could not have "fabricated" these findings as alleged by the British Medical Journal, which now finds itself in the position of needing to issue a retraction, or it must now expand its accusations of fraud to include Professor - and Dr Dhillon... essentially, the BMJ must now insist that a "conspiracy of fraud" existed among at least these three researchers, and possibly more, in order to back up its allegation that Dr Wakefield's study results were fabricated.

The smoking-gun evidenceProfessor -'s 1996 presentation at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School was entitled, "Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR - A Review of the First Seven Cases."His presentation notes began with the following text: ""I wish today, to present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly presenttheir case history [sic]."He then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar Dhillon. Importantly, Dr

Wakefield was not part of this investigation. This means that Dr Wakefield's findings were independently replicated by another medical research team.The British Medical Journal's accusations against Dr Wakefield -- that he fabricated his findings -- are therefore false. The mainstream media accusation that Dr Wakefield's findings have "never been replicated" is also blatantly false.Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autismHistology active chronic inflammation in caecumTreated AsacolINDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.Hyperactive from 18 months.Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexureCaecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollencore.Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammationAcute and chronic inflammation.Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN'S DISEASEChild 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal developmentMMR at 5 months [sic]Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behaviorHyperactive with foodColonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodularhyperplasia.Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in

inflammatory cells (Dhillon)Routine normalLYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIAINDETERMINATE COLITIS**[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months ofage and MMR at 2.5. years]Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death(DPT)MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week."measles rash" week beforeEndoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular patternHistology - non-specific proctocolitis**TreatedINDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITISLYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIAChild 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormalthereafter.Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasiaHistopathology: Marked increase in IEL's

[intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileumwith chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIAINDETERMINATE COLITISChild 6(7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction2 years behavioral change - 2.5 yearsScreaming attacks - / food relatedEndoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileumHistology - Prominent lymphoid folliclesDhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL's, increase in chronic inflammatorycells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granulomaINDTERMINATE COLITISChild 78. MMR 14 months16 months "growling voice"18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 yearsBarium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion ofterminal ileumEndoscopy- prominent lymphoid

follicle in ileumMild proctitis with granular mucosaHistologyIleum - reactive folliclesColon - bifid forms, increased IEL'sSlight increase in inflammatory cellsINDETERMINATE COLITIS? CROHN'S DISEASENOTES:(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper

BMJ caught in its own fraudThese documents reveal that the British Medical Journal has been caught in its own fraud for willfully ignoring this evidence, which was presented to it long before its recent publication of Deer's article calling Dr Wakefield a fraud.The BMJ willfully ignored this evidence and simply decided to destroy Dr Wakefield's professional reputation by any means necessary. As Dr Wakefield explains:"In allowing itself to become the vehicle for Deer's particular brand of journalism; in circumventing the process of due diligence in its enthusiasm to "kill the beast", the BMJ has taken a huge risk. As the document presented above shows, this was a mistake. Medicine, presented with the possibility of an iatrogenic catastrophe, has boarded a

dissonant bandwagon and has gone after those who have concerns - genuine concerns - that childhood vaccines may be responsible, at least in part, for the autism epidemic. The relevant science has been grossly misrepresented, crushed beneath the wheels of a Public Relations 16-wheeler that is out of control. In the meantime a relentless tsunami of damaged children claims this land."

Deer caught as a liarIt has also been revealed that journalist Deer, the author of the BMJ article condemning Dr Wakefield as a fraud, is himself a liar. In attempting to gather evidence for his article in the BMJ, he lied about his identity and entered the home of one of the parents of the autism children. Specifically, he claimed he was working for The Sunday Times even though he was never a Sunday Times employee.This is just the tip of the iceberg of the outright deception that has been used by the BMJ and Deer in their attempt to silence a doctor whose only "crime" was publicly expressing concern about the safety of MMR vaccines.That the BMJ and its writer Deer have now been caught ignoring evidence and engaging in their own fraud gives

credence to the idea that MMR vaccines may, indeed, not only be dangerous; but that they may be so dangerous that the top medical journals have to lie about the facts in order to protect them.What's clear here is that the BMJ has strayed so far from the realm of evidence-based scientific thinking that it can no longer be called a reputable medical journal at all. Its callous disregard for the truth -- and its politically-motivated witch hunt against a researcher who only sought to protect the health of children -- exposes it as a danger to the scientific community and the world of conventional medicine.As this truth unfolds, these revelations will rock the medical world and expose these science journals as the frauds they truly are. Think about this: While these medical journals are taking money from vaccine manufacturers (who pay their ads), they are ignoring any scientific evidence they don't like in order to vilify anyone who threatens the profits of these very same vaccine companies! And yet, these medical journals never admit that their very existence depends on the financial flow of money from these vaccine manufacturers who are strongly impacted by their editorial decisions!There is fraud taking place in the vaccine industry today,

of course, and the medical journals are the point men who push their distorted disinformation into the minds of doctors, journalists and anyone they can reach with their scientific distortions. At stake is the future of the vaccine industry, which is of course a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on misinformation and the ongoing scientific censorship of the facts surrounding the health risks posed by vaccines.

Read the book Callous DisregardDr Wakefield is the author of Callous Disregard, the book that exposes the truth behind conventional medicine's political witch hunt. Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr__Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html#ixzz1CAN6JpSQ "The doctor of the future will give no medicine but will interest his patients in the care of the human frame, in diet and in the cause and prevention of disease." - Edison --- FAIR USE NOTICE: This transmittal may contain copyrighted material which is made available for educational purposes and to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. The sender asserts that this transmittal constitutes a 'fair use' of

any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.