Re: Voting II

[Guest guest]

In reference of 's post, I believe he was implying that the

Clinton/Democrat administration has more -potential- of looking at ppl

with disabilities moreso than Bush's. That could be a generalization.

However, with Republicans...we don't see many minorities in their

public mainstream, thus they are probably overlooked compared to the

" norm. "

Outside of Gore/Bush... Bill Bradley had 1 black and 1 Asian advisor

on his poltical campaign and McCain's advisors were all

Caucasion...

Anyway, I'll end here since its starting to get off-topic.

[Guest guest]

Irene,

I just wanted to add my comment to your email. I agree with Tony's post

and your commentary. Just due to the fact that Gore chose ph Lieberman

as his VP, shows that it doesn't matter if you are a minority or of

different religion, it just matters if you are qualified to do the job. I

think if Gore/Lieberman win the election, I think it will break down a lot

of barriers in the goverment and society and be more accepting to all

minorities (racial, religious, or disabled.) I was also very impressed with

Al Gore's letter to halftheplanet.com. He seems very dedicated to helping

creating more opportunities for persons with disabilities.

yuan@... wrote:

> In reference of 's post, I believe he was implying that the

> Clinton/Democrat administration has more -potential- of looking at ppl

> with disabilities moreso than Bush's. That could be a generalization.

> However, with Republicans...we don't see many minorities in their

> public mainstream, thus they are probably overlooked compared to the

> " norm. "

>

> Outside of Gore/Bush... Bill Bradley had 1 black and 1 Asian advisor

> on his poltical campaign and McCain's advisors were all

> Caucasion...

>

> Anyway, I'll end here since its starting to get off-topic.

>