Guest guest Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Below is a link to a free e-book by Dr.Rath on the connection between heart disease and insufficient vitamin C intake. http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/About_Dr_Matthias_Rath/why_boo\ k.html Alobar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 I think Dr. Rath and Dr. ing missed the point in their approach to use lots of vitamin C; that being the glutathione connection. One of the master antioxidant's roles is to recycle the other antioxidants, so if one is not low in the master antioxidant, one does not need nearly as much vitamin C or the other antioxidants so normal intakes would suffice. Glutathione is the primary protector of cells, and especially the mitochondria, the energy centers in the cells. Glutathione is also essential in the energy cycle itself, unlike the other antioxidants you'd eat in food. Duncan > > Below is a link to a free e-book by Dr.Rath on the connection between > heart disease and insufficient vitamin C intake. > > http://www4.dr-rath- foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/About_Dr_Matthias_Rath/why_book.html > > Alobar > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 I have found that both are important. Before I started taking whey, I needed about 30 grams of C most days before I got soft stool. Now, with taking whey twice a day, I need just 5 grams of C. But I suspect that no matter how much whey I used each day, the puny RDA for C just would not do it for me. Others may find differently, but for me with type 2 diabetes, I find I still need 5 grams or so of C each day. Alobar On 6/29/08, Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...> wrote: > I think Dr. Rath and Dr. ing missed the point in their approach to > use lots of vitamin C; that being the glutathione connection. One of > the master antioxidant's roles is to recycle the other antioxidants, > so if one is not low in the master antioxidant, one does not need > nearly as much vitamin C or the other antioxidants so normal intakes > would suffice. > > Glutathione is the primary protector of cells, and especially the > mitochondria, the energy centers in the cells. Glutathione is also > essential in the energy cycle itself, unlike the other antioxidants > you'd eat in food. > > Duncan > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 I've been following this thread on vitamin C and have always been a believer in supplementing it as we don't make our own. Then I read a startling (to me) thought in the book, 'The Terrain Is Everything' by Stockton. On page 219, regarding an experiment by Dr. Linus ing's former colleague, Dr. Arthur on the effects of large doses of vitamin C in the form of ascorbic acid, Dr. reports that he had done research on mice, which indicated that a " moderate " dose of ascorbic acid resulted in an increased incidence of cancer . " The bottom line after three years of research was as follows: When you give mice the equivalent of the 5 or 10 grams a day of vitamin C that ing recommends for people, it about doubled the cancer rate. If you give them massive multiple vitamins, it does, too. As you go up in dose range, you near the lethal dose. And just under the lethal dose of vitamin C, there starts to be a suppression of cancer " The book goes on to explain that large doses of vitamin C have the potential to be very " corrosive " on the body and has many other negative effects if taken in larger amounts than we can get in our food. Is anyone familiar with this theory?After I read this I was afraid to take the large amounts I used to . Admittedly, the experiments were all performed on mice. Vitamin C and Heart Disease Below is a link to a free e-book by Dr.Rath on the connection between heart disease and insufficient vitamin C intake. http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/About_Dr_Matthias_Rath/why_boo\ k.html Alobar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 : I read this information many years ago and change my source of C at that time. 's account of ing is not very complimentary and makes one scratch their head as to why he was given so much acclaim. There are other studies that discuss that the C can cause plaque to come off in chunks and plug capillaries and valves. Â From: sanr@... <sanr@...> Subject: Re: Vitamin C and Heart Disease Coconut Oil Date: Monday, June 30, 2008, 10:14 AM I've been following this thread on vitamin C and have always been a believer in supplementing it as we don't make our own. Then I read a startling (to me) thought in the book, 'The Terrain Is Everything' by Stockton. On page 219, regarding an experiment by Dr. Linus ing's former colleague, Dr. Arthur on the effects of large doses of vitamin C in the form of ascorbic acid, Dr. reports that he had done research on mice, which indicated that a " moderate " dose of ascorbic acid resulted in an increased incidence of cancer . " The bottom line after three years of research was as follows: When you give mice the equivalent of the 5 or 10 grams a day of vitamin C that ing recommends for people, it about doubled the cancer rate. If you give them massive multiple vitamins, it does, too. As you go up in dose range, you near the lethal dose. And just under the lethal dose of vitamin C, there starts to be a suppression of cancer " The book goes on to explain that large doses of vitamin C have the potential to be very " corrosive " on the body and has many other negative effects if taken in larger amounts than we can get in our food. Is anyone familiar with this theory?After I read this I was afraid to take the large amounts I used to . Admittedly, the experiments were all performed on mice. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 I agree that the RDA for C is ridiculous; I take 1500-2,000 mg even though I'm using whey twice daily. Of course it's a long way from the 12,000-20,000 mg I think was suggestd by the good Drs, who didn't mention a glutathione increase at all... I'm glad you're up on the antioxidants Alobar; diabetes nets a LOT of free radical damage without them. Duncan > > I think Dr. Rath and Dr. ing missed the point in their approach to > > use lots of vitamin C; that being the glutathione connection. One of > > the master antioxidant's roles is to recycle the other antioxidants, > > so if one is not low in the master antioxidant, one does not need > > nearly as much vitamin C or the other antioxidants so normal intakes > > would suffice. > > > > Glutathione is the primary protector of cells, and especially the > > mitochondria, the energy centers in the cells. Glutathione is also > > essential in the energy cycle itself, unlike the other antioxidants > > you'd eat in food. > > > > Duncan > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 Duke, one can use BlockBuster AllClear to erode plaque and excess fibrin so plaque and blood clots safely dissolve without coming off in chunks. It also works on spontaneous blood coagulation (coagulopathy) that affects primarily elderly people, also scar tissue, endometrioss and adhesions. More info here: http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/BlockBuster-enzymes.html Follow the link to the product dfetails page to see what's in it. Duncan > > From: sanr@... <sanr@...> > Subject: Re: Vitamin C and Heart Disease > Coconut Oil > Date: Monday, June 30, 2008, 10:14 AM > > > > > > > I've been following this thread on vitamin C and have always been a believer in supplementing it as we don't make our own. Then I > read a startling (to me) thought in the book, 'The Terrain Is Everything' by Stockton. On page 219, regarding an experiment by > Dr. Linus ing's former colleague, Dr. Arthur on the effects of large doses of vitamin C in the form of ascorbic acid, > Dr. reports that he had done research on mice, which indicated that a " moderate " dose of ascorbic acid resulted in an > increased incidence of cancer . " The bottom line after three years of research was as follows: When you give mice the equivalent of > the 5 or 10 grams a day of vitamin C that ing recommends for people, it about doubled the cancer rate. If you give them massive > multiple vitamins, it does, too. As you go up in dose range, you near the lethal dose. And just under the lethal dose of vitamin C, > there starts to be a suppression of cancer " > > The book goes on to explain that large doses of vitamin C have the potential to be very " corrosive " on the body and has many other > negative effects if taken in larger amounts than we can get in our food. > > Is anyone familiar with this theory?After I read this I was afraid to take the large amounts I used to . Admittedly, the experiments > were all performed on mice. > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 did his experimental work on MICE. Mice make their own vitamin C. I am reminded of reading that the initial research which supposedly demonstrated how harmful dietary cholesterol can be was done using guinea pigs, which do not eat meat and therefore do not normally eat cholesterol. Even trained scientists make mistakes. I consider to have made a mistake. Alobar On 6/30/08, sanr@... <sanr@...> wrote: > I've been following this thread on vitamin C and have always been a believer in supplementing it as we don't make our own. Then I > read a startling (to me) thought in the book, 'The Terrain Is Everything' by Stockton. On page 219, regarding an experiment by > Dr. Linus ing's former colleague, Dr. Arthur on the effects of large doses of vitamin C in the form of ascorbic acid, > Dr. reports that he had done research on mice, which indicated that a " moderate " dose of ascorbic acid resulted in an > increased incidence of cancer . " The bottom line after three years of research was as follows: When you give mice the equivalent of > the 5 or 10 grams a day of vitamin C that ing recommends for people, it about doubled the cancer rate. If you give them massive > multiple vitamins, it does, too. As you go up in dose range, you near the lethal dose. And just under the lethal dose of vitamin C, > there starts to be a suppression of cancer " > > The book goes on to explain that large doses of vitamin C have the potential to be very " corrosive " on the body and has many other > negative effects if taken in larger amounts than we can get in our food. > > Is anyone familiar with this theory?After I read this I was afraid to take the large amounts I used to . Admittedly, the experiments > were all performed on mice. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 Plaque does not come off in chunks. I'd love to see the supposed " research " on that one. Alobar On 6/30/08, Duke Stone <dukesdeals@...> wrote: > : > I read this information many years ago and change my source of C at that time. 's account of ing is not very complimentary and makes one scratch their head as to why he was given so much acclaim. There are other studies that discuss that the C can cause plaque to come off in chunks and plug capillaries and valves. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.