Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 I think you're right about that, Rodney. Women tend to become ammenorrheic and may thus be more at risk for osteoporosis at low body fat levels. >From: " Rodney " <perspect1111@...> >Reply- > >Subject: [ ] Re: Useful Source >Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:05:46 -0000 > >Hi : > >Every other source I have seen, if they are correct, indicates >the 'do-not-go-below' level for body fat for women is WAY higher than >suggested by that article. > >Perhaps evey other source I have seen is wrong. But if I was female >I wouldn't want to bet my health on it. > >Rodney. > > > > > > Thanks, Rodney! > > > > > > > > What's wrong with the body fat numbers for women, specifically? >(too low?; > > too high?) > > > > > > >From: " Rodney " <perspect1111@y...> > > >Reply- > > > > > >Subject: [ ] Useful Source > > >Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 02:17:17 -0000 > > > > > >Hi folks: > > > > > >The following site seems to proivide some good information for >those > > >of us relatively new to CRON. > > > > > >[EXCEPT: I believe the body fat numbers for women are COMPLETELY > > >wrong] > > > > > >http://www.optimal.org/peter/cron.htm > > > > > >Rodney. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.