Guest guest Posted March 9, 2004 Report Share Posted March 9, 2004 I'm not advocating a non-CRON approach in suggesting the potential value in consuming refined sugar. It is not an easy thing to appreciate - at least in my mind. I remembering reading of the immense value placed on sugar in the 16th? century by Queen and other royalty of that age. It was an inheritable good, alongside jewels! It has also done immense harm in the ensuing centuries. If I may suggest a book, written by an authoritative author/researcher, that makes the case for its' value - " How to Manage Your Mind and Mood through Nutrition " by Wurtman. Granted it was written for the general public, but the author is also the editor of a multi-volume set on the subject of brain neurotransmitters. As Walford has written, it matters not what the ratios of fat, carbohydrate or protein are in the diet as long as there is optimum nutrition and you are at your appropriate weight. I don't know how many people in this newsgroup are following a low-carb approach. I imagine it is not that many. If you do follow such an approach, keep in mind the therapeutic value of refined sugar - in moderation. And if you follow a high-protein diet, the same holds. ------------ P.S. Wurtman also wrote a research paper on the potential value of maintaining a 5:1 ratio of carbohydrate to protein. Either for the Alzheimer's patient or Parkinson's patient, I can't remember which. Very interesting area of inquiry. Surprisingly, the RDA ratio for those macronutrients is 5:1. Steve Cushing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.