Guest guest Posted March 10, 2004 Report Share Posted March 10, 2004 Hi folks: Gosh, and I had never realized that fibre, that is not absorbed, is included in the carbohyrate number in the nutrient analyses. Is that really correct? If so then no wonder we have difficulty correlating weight change with the calorie data we have for the foods we eat. Rodney. > Fascinating discussion of sugar alcohols by Rick Mendosa, also author > of an extensive Glycemic Index and Insulin Index on the web: > > http://www.mendosa.com/netcarbs.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2004 Report Share Posted March 10, 2004 AFAIK, the presence of fiber is considered in calculations of caloric content of foods. >From: " Rodney " <perspect1111@...> >Reply- > >Subject: [ ] F/U Re: Erythritol >Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:19:26 -0000 > >Hi folks: > >Gosh, and I had never realized that fibre, that is not absorbed, is >included in the carbohyrate number in the nutrient analyses. Is that >really correct? If so then no wonder we have difficulty correlating >weight change with the calorie data we have for the foods we eat. > >Rodney. > > > > Fascinating discussion of sugar alcohols by Rick Mendosa, also >author > > of an extensive Glycemic Index and Insulin Index on the web: > > > > http://www.mendosa.com/netcarbs.htm > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.