Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Hi folks: I spent a fair amount of time yesterday trying to determine how best to fix my deficiencies of calcium and zinc. Probably none of the below will be new to the veterans here. But for anyone who still finds they have these deficiencies the following may be helpful. CALCIUM First I discovered a study which showed that calcium supplements - either calcium carbonate or the more expensive calcium citrate - ARE very well absorbed by the body. So taking calcium carbonate will fix such a problem without the 'amino acid issue' of dairy products or the 'oxalic acid' problem of some green vegetables. [Does anyone have data for the oxalic acid content of bok choy? (Alias pak choi)] It looks as if I will need to be taking about 500 mg a day of calcium carbonate. I don't need Caltrate because I am not deficient in vitamin D. ZINC As for the zinc issue, I checked various places to locate supposedly " good " sources of zinc. If Fitday's data are correct many of the " good " sources listed are in reality " very crummy " sources. Perhaps the following may be news to those who disdain 'analyzing' things! (If you don't 'analyze' it how would you ever find this kind of stuff out?) For example, herring was listed as a good source of zinc at one place. Since I eat herring I wondered how, if that was the case, I could be deficient in it. So I checked the Fitday data. One hundred calories of " finfish, herring, pacific, cooked, dry heat " provides 1.81% of the RDA for zinc. Now think about what this means. It means that even if you are consuming 2000 calories a day (appreciably more than most people here) and if in addition you eat HERRING ONLY, NOTHING ELSE!!!! you will still only get 37.4% of the RDA!!!! This is supposed to be a good source? So I searched for atlantic herring. I could only find it raw: " finfish, herring, atlantic, raw " provides more zinc. One hundred calories contains 4.18% of the RDA. So if you ate nothing but raw atlantic herring, you would get 84% of the RDA! (And how much of the difference between the cooked pacific and the raw atlantic is accounted for by what drips out of it while you are cooking it? Possibly the atlantic is no better than the pacific). But in either case they are truly CRUMMY sources of zinc. So what are the genuinely good sources of zinc? On the basis that anything 100 calories of which supplies less than 10% of the RDA are useless, here are the things I found that contain more than 10%. There may be others. 18.1% eye of round, beef // 18.4% chicken liver // 21.5% '100% bran' // 23.4% chuck arm, beef // 26.2% round tip, beef // 29.1% wheat germ // 31.6% 'Allbran' // 34.8% shank, beef // 100% 'oatmeal with oat bran, fortified, regular flavor' // 878.7% oysters!!!! Yes. Just one-quarter of an ounce of canned oysters a day would bring my zinc consumption up to 100% of the RDA. I wasn't able to find information on degree of zinc absorption from various food sources. It is also worth noting that the better cuts of beef had relatively minimal amounts of zinc. So if you choose beef, you have to eat the tough stuff. Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.