Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: wi-fi

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

So you are saying that you HAVE to stay somewhere that has Wi-Fi and you cannot

turn it off because the social order is such that it is better to have it on

than suffer the emotions/relationship problems to turn it off?

That pisses me off that you would allow that condition in your life and not

value yourself enough to take care of your self either by leaving or waking

these people up to your reality.

You can see this triggers my emotions and so obviously has nothing to do with

you.

Get creative with your solutions. Simply remove/unscrew the antennas from the

Wi-Fi router and use cables/cords to the computers. They have 50-100 foot long

cables that can run all over the house to where ever people think they need to

have computer access. Download speed will be much higher and access to your

computer much more secure.

You may still need to wrap the router in silver mesh to stop the residual

emissions but this is a hell of a lot better than being radiated 24/7.

At night, get a timer to shut off the router from 11-6am unless someone is

looking at porn all night and doesn't want it off.

Don't settle for this crap. Do something to change your situation.

On May 23, 2011, at 6:13 AM, svetaswan wrote:

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing

that to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not

aware of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the

wireless router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless -

which is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about

it. If I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago.

As it is, I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a

lot of other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do

this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi

on the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Wow,

 

This reality of ours really hits on the theme of power vs. powerlessness.  I,

too feel powerless at times... at home, because of all the extraneous electronic

noise that comes in from the busy street that I live on and the residents and

visitors with cell phones and bad attitudes within the house which seem to be

multiplied by the microwaves.  But also at work (a hospital) where laptops are

in multiple usage and WIFI is available to all and cell phones rule the roost. 

 

I feel a bit better now since getting some of the fabric manufactured by LessEMF

at 50db atttenuation. Where I used to confront people all the time as they would

near me with cell phones (new age weaponry to my body) and push their

friggin'laptops right up to my work area.

 

The loose piece of fabric only helps to make me more tolerant, but doesn't

completely protect me.  I need to have a wardrobe made.  Metallic threads are

very expensive to make into garments.  One must crawl before walking.

 

Parents do exert a considerable amount of influence as do one's boss and one's

spouse, even one's children have influence.  is right when he says we

must be empowered.  Maybe that's why some of us came down with this thing.  We

are the vanguard.  Sadly, we are the ones who are forced to listen to and

embrace the microwave warnings because everyone else thinks that any harm may be

a decade away, if at all...and we know right now that harm is being done.

 

Parents are at potential risk as well, especially from cell phones.  There is

just no way to ride two horses with one butt. I truly believe that we will

become empowered and I am so happy to see those of us making strides to change

this dismal future.  But if we don't who will? 

 

Global society is deaf, dumb and blind (consciously) to what may very well rivot

our human genome over the next 50 years.  Cigarettes ain't seen nothing. FiGHT

FOR YOUR RIGHT TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, or maybe perish!  These are fighting

words in a time where war has been silently waged against us.

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Amen sister! I applaud your fire!

The other day I stood in front of a cash register that had a DECT phone

(cordless) and base right in front of me. The poor cashier

had her brains frozen over the transaction of deducting 20 % off the

bill.....she was so embarrassed. I ended up helping her

do the math. The boss was standing right next to her, and he couldn't do the

math either, or operate the register to deduct

the 20 % off. A day later, I had the worse radiation hang over I've ever had to

date. These people do not have a clue that

those dect phone bases are literally like standing within the shadows of a very

powerful cell antenna!

Lizzie

From: adiaha22@...

Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:33:37 -0700

Subject: Re: Re: wi-fi

Wow,

This reality of ours really hits on the theme of power vs. powerlessness. I,

too feel powerless at times... at home, because of all the extraneous electronic

noise that comes in from the busy street that I live on and the residents and

visitors with cell phones and bad attitudes within the house which seem to be

multiplied by the microwaves. But also at work (a hospital) where laptops are

in multiple usage and WIFI is available to all and cell phones rule the roost.

I feel a bit better now since getting some of the fabric manufactured by LessEMF

at 50db atttenuation. Where I used to confront people all the time as they would

near me with cell phones (new age weaponry to my body) and push their

friggin'laptops right up to my work area.

The loose piece of fabric only helps to make me more tolerant, but doesn't

completely protect me. I need to have a wardrobe made. Metallic threads are

very expensive to make into garments. One must crawl before walking.

Parents do exert a considerable amount of influence as do one's boss and one's

spouse, even one's children have influence. is right when he says we

must be empowered. Maybe that's why some of us came down with this thing. We

are the vanguard. Sadly, we are the ones who are forced to listen to and

embrace the microwave warnings because everyone else thinks that any harm may be

a decade away, if at all...and we know right now that harm is being done.

Parents are at potential risk as well, especially from cell phones. There is

just no way to ride two horses with one butt. I truly believe that we will

become empowered and I am so happy to see those of us making strides to change

this dismal future. But if we don't who will?

Global society is deaf, dumb and blind (consciously) to what may very well rivot

our human genome over the next 50 years. Cigarettes ain't seen nothing. FiGHT

FOR YOUR RIGHT TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, or maybe perish! These are fighting

words in a time where war has been silently waged against us.

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi, Pamela,

 

Have you ever tried bathing in baking soda?  Wow, you are in a very acidic

environment, daily.  Baking soda bathing will not do wonders, but it should

help some.  Raising your pH in other ways might help also.  (Soak your hair in

the baking soda, too, but

don't wash your hair with shampoo or your body with soap after soaking in

bathing soda, btw; just shower off and rinse the soda off.) 

 

Raising your body frequency, chi, whatever you want to call it--and

pH--are each empowering to a person, also.  Some people just exude power; do

you know what I mean?  When they walk into a room, without doing anything

consciously, they just own the space and you know they are a force to be

reckoned with.  Another person can walk into a room and you know they are a

push over.  As Westerners, we think of empowerment as being something we

consciously work for or do.  In Eastern countries, they emphasize empowerment

from within.  Both might be needed, but I see a difference in my life luck-wise

(how easily things flow for me), and in how people treat me (who do not know

me), AND ES-wise just from improving my pH and trying to bring more good chi

and good frequencies into my life.

 

Hope this helps you,

Diane

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks I needed to hear that. I really need to make changes in my life as

well. Powerful words that people need to hear!  Loni  

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank you Loni. I was worried how you were going to take it.

with love,

On May 23, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Loni wrote:

> Thanks I needed to hear that. I really need to make changes

> in my life as well. Powerful words that people need to hear! Loni

>

>

>

>>

>>

>> Emraware,

>>

>> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't

>> addressing that to you - unless you post under several different

>> screenames that I'm not aware of? It was someone else who once

>> suggested that I could disable the wireless router remotely,

>> through software or via the Internet.

>>

>> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation

>> where I don't have the power to make the household decisions that

>> many of you may take for granted. So it's not that I don't know

>> about the dangers of wireless - which is what you seem to have

>> presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If I had the

>> authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it

>> is, I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as

>> you or a lot of other people can do.

>>

>> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a

>> little more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this

>> much - or I would probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that

>> my situation is exactly good or safe now).

>>

>> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less

>> computer savvy than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made

>> those changes to the WiFi settings. They wouldn't have ever had to

>> know....but I did end up mentioning it to them on a couple of

>> occasions. They still may not fully understand what I did.

>> Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router

>> remains on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>>

>> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at

>> " ground zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much

>> stronger than our old Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear

>> router). I don't remember feeling the Comcast router, unless I was

>> at ground zero.

>>

>> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless

>> adapter to operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the

>> wireless adapter: " maximum performance " , " low power saving " ,

>> " medium power saving " , & " maximum power saving " . Apparently, the

>> wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when it's plugged

>> in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

>> try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've

>> never tried " medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>>

>> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press

>> it, it turns off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the

>> option of turning it completely off - I pretty much have to use

>> wireless.

>>

>> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain

>> at least 8 inches from the wireless antenna - which is located

>> inside of the upper margin of the screen, apparently. Supposedly

>> you are within the government's " safe " exposure limits when you are

>> 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying much...

>>

>> ~Svetaswan

>>

>>

>>>

>>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the

>>>> power output of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you

>>>> telling me that I could do this

>>>

>>> Svetaswan,

>>>

>>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/

>>> ethernet cables instead of a wireless router.

>>>

>>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of

>>> the equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on

>>> your laptop-- which would be right next to you... Does your laptop

>>> have a similar " dial-down " option?

>>>

>>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a

>>> distance of 1 meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell

>>> phone held directly to the head. I think some laptops might be

>>> similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on the laptop via the

>>> control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> ------------------------------------

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sounds like me, when people have plugged their phones in the outlet near me to

charge-- like someone stepped into the middle of my brain. PC

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Diane,

 

Thanks so much for your advice. I was wondering how much baking soda you suggest

for the bath? There's something else about the relationship between lemon juice

and purified water and making the body more alkaline.  I never got the ratio

correct (how many parts lemon juice to what amount of water). PC

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

puk replies

There is a danger in this phenomenon in that when we find relief in such

ways we may have a tendency to do to much to soon and although we might be

getting less of an EMR hit over time the dose mounts up and we get what could

be termed a more profound dose than if we tried to cope with the higher

dose where we would exercise more caution generally by mitigating exposure.

This can be seen in the situation where an ESser considers themselves better

and starts to resume a modicum of a normal lets say work life and hey

presto they crash after a certain period of time, as their sensitivity

accumulates and overwhelms them.

In a message dated 26/05/2011 01:17:45 GMT Daylight Time,

svetaswan@... writes:

Just wanted to give an update of my experiences in fooling around with the

" Power Options " in an attempt to lower emf:

I reported feeling relief when I changed the wireless adapter settings

from " maximum performance " to " medium power saving " . I did feel relief for

awhile - then I noticed a " rebound " effect, where the " disturbing energy "

increased. Only the disturbing energy didn't feel exactly the same as the

original setting of " maximum performance " - it felt like the emf may have been

coming in an " altered " form. I think I noticed the fans coming on more

often, too - and the fans were more bothersome than usual. The overall effect

was that the computer had become significantly more bothersome than it was

when I had it on the original power settings.

(In addition to messing with the wireless adapter settings - I also fooled

around with the USB port settings and the PCI Express settings...I was

trying to effectively " turn off " things that weren't in use. I ended up

undoing these changes.)

What I think may have happened is that - by dialing down or turning off

the power-flow to certain locations - the computer started " throwing off " or

wasting power, and that wasted power became heat and/or emr

(electromagnetic radiation). So dialing down the power of components may come

with a price

- or it may actually increase emf in the long run. (At least while the

computer is plugged in.) Maybe the computer is designed to distribute power in

a certain way - and deviating from the default too much may create emf on

its own. Maybe it's like dimming the screen - in some ways it's a good

thing, it saves power - but it also generates emr.

That's not to discourage anyone from trying this - your experience may be

very different. Results may vary depending on the person and the computer.

I just wanted to relate a possibility.

And maybe I should repeat this experiment - just to make sure it wasn't a

coincidence, or my imagination.

~Svetaswan

P.S. - I guess this experience validates my instinct to go with a computer

that had tolerable default settings - instead of buying a computer that's

really troublesome on the default settings, then trying to use it on

minimal power settings. It's tempting to see a Windows 7 laptop and be seduced

by

all of those nice power-customization options - and buy an emf-heavy

computer in hopes of " fixing " it through the " Power Options " menu. Those

options

may be helpful, but if this experience is any indication - you may not

want to depend on them *too* much.

> > >

> > > > Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the

power output of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that

I could do this

> > >

> > > Svetaswan,

> > >

> > > I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/

ethernet cables instead of a wireless router.

> > >

> > > Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop--

which would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar

" dial-down " option?

> > >

> > > One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a

distance of 1 meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held

directly to the head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should

" disable " Wi-Fi on the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's

the best.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Pamela,

 

Sorry, I am only online on weekends, so I am just getting to this email!

 

I use 2 cups (1 pound) of baking soda/ bath.  My tub is a standard 3 by 5 feet

and holds about 11 inches of water.

 

I don't remember the recipe for lemons.  One thing here: lemons mess with my

digestive acids a bit too much, so I personally couldn't continue that

therapy.  Alkalized water drops (a supplement which added minerals to raise the

pH of drinking water) worked very well for me, tho.  Hydrogen supplements (like

Hydrogen Booster and Mega-H) raise pH too.

 

Hope this helps you!

Diane

>

>

> Emraware,

>

> You seem to have assumed that I was referring to you. I wasn't addressing that

to you - unless you post under several different screenames that I'm not aware

of? It was someone else who once suggested that I could disable the wireless

router remotely, through software or via the Internet.

>

> And like I've said several times before, I'm in a living situation where I

don't have the power to make the household decisions that many of you may take

for granted. So it's not that I don't know about the dangers of wireless - which

is what you seem to have presumed - it's just that I can't do much about it. If

I had the authority, I would have gotten rid of WiFi a long time ago. As it is,

I have to do what is within my power - which isn't as much as you or a lot of

other people can do.

>

> I may not be able to get rid of WiFi - but at least I can make it a little

more " comfortable " . It's a good thing that I can do this much - or I would

probably be in a *very* bad place now (not that my situation is exactly good or

safe now).

>

> It's a good thing that my parents are in some ways even less computer savvy

than I am - they didn't even realize that I had made those changes to the WiFi

settings. They wouldn't have ever had to know....but I did end up mentioning it

to them on a couple of occasions. They still may not fully understand what I

did. Apparently they don't even care that much - as long as the router remains

on and the computers can still access the Internet.

>

> Our router is located in the basement - so we're not exactly at " ground

zero " ...but it seems to be a very strong router - much stronger than our old

Comcast router (which was the white, Netgear router). I don't remember feeling

the Comcast router, unless I was at ground zero.

>

> There appears to be an option where you can command the wireless adapter to

operate on lower power. There are 4 settings for the wireless adapter: " maximum

performance " , " low power saving " , " medium power saving " , & " maximum power

saving " . Apparently, the wireless adapter is on the " maximum performance " when

it's plugged in - then goes to " low power saving " on battery. I guess I should

try to lower these settings and see how my computer does - I've never tried

" medium power saving " or " maximum power saving " .

>

> There is even a button on the computer itself where if you press it, it turns

off the wireless adapter. But I don't really have the option of turning it

completely off - I pretty much have to use wireless.

>

> In the manual for this computer - it is recommended that you remain at least 8

inches from the wireless antenna - which is located inside of the upper margin

of the screen, apparently. Supposedly you are within the government's " safe "

exposure limits when you are 8 inches away - although that's probably not saying

much...

>

> ~Svetaswan

>

>

>>

>>> Another thing that I finally started doing was dialing down the power output

of our satanic AT & T WiFry router. I remember you telling me that I could do this

>>

>> Svetaswan,

>>

>> I don't remember ever suggesting this. I use a wired router w/ ethernet

cables instead of a wireless router.

>>

>> Even if you lower your Wi-Fi router's power, that's only half of the

equation. Your dominant exposure is probably from Wi-Fi on your laptop-- which

would be right next to you... Does your laptop have a similar " dial-down "

option?

>>

>> One acquaintance of mine tested a wi-fi router and found at a distance of 1

meter, the radiation was the same as that of a cell phone held directly to the

head. I think some laptops might be similar? IMO, one should " disable " Wi-Fi on

the laptop via the control panel, network settings. That's the best.

>>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...