Guest guest Posted April 15, 2004 Report Share Posted April 15, 2004 Hi folks: When I first read Dr. Spindler's most recently published mouse CR study and didn't see supplementation mentioned in the text I drew the conclusion that the CR mice simply ate 45% less of everything. I should have taken a closer look at the fine print! In short, his CR mice WERE supplemented. They consumed identical amounts of fat, protein and micronutrients as the control (10% CR) group. The difference seems to have been only in the caloric quantity of the carbohydrates, more of some, less of others. Sounds to me like they were on an Atkins diet ; ^ ))) I hope I didn't mislead anyone about this. Rodney. Does anyone here have a reference for a CR study in mammals that shows that if the study animals are not supplemented they survive less well or less long than the supplemented animals on the same number of calories????? People talk about this a lot, but I have never seen a study which demonstrated it. Presumably there is one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.