Prof. Park's offensive commentary against Arthur Firstenberg and victims of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)

[Guest guest]

Greetings!

 

It saddens me that I was informed of  Prof. Park's belligerent attitude against

people who claim to have microwave poisoning or EHS from the onslaught of

microwave proliferation that has happily plagued us since it's demonic

legislation was unconstitutionally employed back in 1996. 

 

I suppose that Prof. Park concurs with American's rights being violated and

municipalities rights being infringed upon and the intimidation of less and less

freedom as the constitution takes another blow, as well as people's

intelligences.  Why is it that with all the brilliance of our scholarly

community, we as a society can only seem to create problems greater than the

ones we claim to want to correct? This occurs across the board--where is the

so-called intelligence in higher learning in this day and age?  Seems to me that

intelligence has come to mean how to exploit or con our neighbors so that more

money can trickle into those " smart " pockets.

 

Is it rocket science to conclude that every cause has a greater or lesser

effect?  Scientists have already proven the validity of a presumed danger with

regards to microwaves and human health as well as microwaves and their effect on

the DNA of our cells.  Is it possible that your professor's addiction to the

technology (even medical doctors seemed steeped in the denial of the current

generation ie. like the internet bubble, the housing bubble and all the bubbles

to follow)... Just because we choose to lie to ourselves doesn't mean that lies

are other than lies.  EHS just ensures that the lies will become more obvious as

time goes on.

 

Prof. Park needs to personally encounter this new fangled condition.  He seems

like the type who would probably deny those who may have developed a form of

cancer or other malady associated with microwave poisoning simply because the

topic makes him feel uncomfortable. For all of those who have developed and will

develop this intrusive affliction which debiltates some, breaks up families,

makes people housing refugees and multiplies potential symptoms multi-fold-- I

say Prof. Park I hope you do not teach science, engineering (more than a few

electrical engineers develop EHS) or medicine. I can only hope you teach

telecommunications because your ignorance of the other disciplines might make

you seem like you grew up in a deficient school district as a child-- all talk

no action.

 

Finally, I'd like to ask him, If people can develop intolerances to sugar,

peanuts, bee stings, sea food-- than aside from the bias created by his own fear

from technology overuse/abuse, what qualifies him to suggest that he knows

beyond doubt what can effect the health of 3 to 35 percent of the population? 

He better hope his techno-abuses don't render his testicles useless, his eyes

without sight, his cells mutated or hope that the brains of his underaged cell

phone using children are not harmed by the blood-brain barrier disruption or the

premature atrophy of cells-- all scientifically acccepted as probable causes for

people not necessarily effected by EHS. People who smoke love cigarettes

regardless of the implications and the same seems to apply to overactive WIFIers

or cell phoners unconsciously emitting low frequency radiations into the

environment all day long (cause-- only in America do causes not seem to produce

effects). (Yet they do all

the time, we just prefer to deny.  It's called insanity in a logical reality)

 

True science suggests that  only various observations over time will provide a

foundation for a correct understanding of this human experiment that we've all

been forced to undertake-- like it or not.  Our children stand to be the

greatest losers of this battle for intelligence, health, light, fairness and a

right to live a free existence in a free world--N-O-T). 

 

If I were being taught at the college level by an automaton like Prof. Park, I'd

want my money back. Gee, I don't think I've ever heard of a university giving a

money-back guarantee. In fact, are they still taking money from banks to supply

students with credit cards.  Oh sorry, that's just another ludicrous practice of

institutions of higher learning exploiting and making our future more destitute

than it looks right now.

 

I guess Prof. Park may be in the right place afterall.  Please take some time to

talk to some essers (people who claim EHS).  It's a very gifted group of

people--truly intelligents...doctors, lawyers, writers, artists, (remember Dr.

Gro Haarlem Brundtland formerly head of WHO back in 2002.) Many are new onset

(let's face it, the proliferation got a lift back in 2007) Dr. Park seems to be

more of a sales rep. for telecom and the FCC than a real professor.  Which is

it?