Guest guest Posted April 22, 2004 Report Share Posted April 22, 2004 Hi folks: A few days ago, Francesca asked me how many years a human's life might be extended, if the example of Dr. Spindler's mice turns out to be extrapolatable to humans. I said 'for a number, twelve years'. When I said that, I had forgotten that Warren had already mentioned sixteen years when he originally drew the attention of all of us to the Spindler study. Which number one chooses depends on what you take for the human/mouse lifespan ratio. I now see that Warren had taken a ratio of about 39.5 from the assumption of the Spindler study that a 62.5 year old human was about equivalent to a 19 month old mouse (62.5 x 12 / 19 = 39.5). My twelve years number came from my observation that, in normal circumstances, not many of this strain of mice live to over 40 months, while not many humans live to over 100 years. This gives a ratio of 30 (100 x 12 / 40 = 30). The CR mice lived five months longer than the control mice. So five months times 39.5 = 16.4 years. While five months x 30 = 12.5 years. Either way the increase in lifespan is considerable. But since I don't know much about the lifespan of mice, it is likely better to take Warren's number : ^ ))) Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.