Guest guest Posted May 7, 2004 Report Share Posted May 7, 2004 Hi All, This was an interesting take to me of the Mac's diet story/move: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/07/movies/07SUPE.html?th " 'SUPER SIZE ME' When All Those Big Macs Bite Back By A. O. SCOTT For 30 days, Spurlock consumed nothing but food from Mc's, an experiment in bad living that frames a jaunty critique of junk gastronomy and corporate power. MOVIE REVIEW | 'SUPER SIZE ME' Starring Spurlock. Directed by Spurlock. (NR, 98 minutes). For 30 days, Spurlock consumed nothing but food from Mc's, an experiment in bad living that frames a jaunty critique of junk gastronomy and corporate power. Like a less aggressive, thinner , the director talks to consumers, experts and food-industry flacks, weaving alarming statistics about rampant obesity with visits to the doctor and double-quarter-pounder-with- cheese combo meals. The film is an entertaining statement of the obvious, though its big questions — do corporations serve our need or enslave our bodies and soul?, are public health problems caused by capitalist rapacity or personal choice — are not as simple as Mr. Spurlock would have us believe. — A. O. , The New York Times MPAA Rating: NR Review | Showtimes| Trailer Average Reader Rating: 4.83 Stars Rate This Movie Number of Votes: 18 Super Size Me, " Spurlock's affable, muckraking documentary, elaborates on some facts that everyone seems to know: mainly, that the United States is in the midst of an epidemic of obesity and related health problems, and that fast food is bad for you. His attempt to demonstrate the link between these two matters, using himself as an experimental subject, represents an entertaining, and occasionally horrifying, statement of the obvious. After all, even the Mc's corporation, while defending itself in a lawsuit filed by two overweight teenagers, submitted briefs citing the well-known health risks of its highly processed, high-fat foods. Mc's' victory in the case was followed by the passage in Congress of a bill shielding the industry from future liability. Like suits against tobacco companies, such cases — and the larger issue of the relationship between legal consumables and public health — turn on the question of responsibility. Does it rest with those of us who eat, drink and inhale the products that clog our arteries and corrode our livers and lungs, or with the companies who sell and advertise them? Mr. Spurlock's answer, emphatically anticorporate on its surface, is perhaps more ambiguous than it seems. After all, no one forced him to consume nothing but Mc's food — three meals and more a day, from hot cakes and sausages at dawn to Double Quarter Pounder combo meals late at night — for 30 days. It was his choice. Supervised by three doctors and a nutritionist, and observed by his girlfriend, a professional vegan cook (identified by an on-screen caption as " healthy chef " ), Mr. Spurlock, a fit, active New Yorker, happily set out to ruin his health, and succeeded beyond his wildest expectations. There was some weight gain — 18 pounds by the end of the experiment — and also mood swings, loss of sex drive and nearly catastrophic liver damage. His general practitioner, Daryl Isaacs, likens Mr. Spurlock's all-Mac diet to the terminal alcoholic binge undertaken by Nicolas Cage's character in " Leaving Las Vegas " and worries that his patient may succumb to liver failure before the 30 days are up. This individual, self-induced medical horror story is accompanied by a jaunty barrage of anecdotes and statistics. Not content to stay in Manhattan (which has the highest concentration of Mc's outlets in the country), Mr. Spurlock traveled to places like California, where the chain was born, and Texas, not only the largest state in the union but also one of the fattest. He observes the eating habits of Illinois adolescents, who are fed carbohydrate-loaded treats in their middle-school cafeteria, and meets a man (a very skinny man, by the way) who estimates that he has consumed more than 19,000 Big Macs in his life, the high point of which might have been the day he ate nine. Mr. Spurlock, originally from West Virginia, works in the good- natured, regular-guy populist style of documentary rabble-rousing pioneered by . He is a bit less confrontational than Mr. (as well as thinner), but he similarly relishes letting polite, well-scrubbed corporate flacks entangle themselves in bureaucratic doublespeak. In this case, everyone in the food industry seems to want nothing more than to educate consumers, especially young ones, to make good choices. Anyone who has watched commercial children's television — where the majority of the ads hawk food of dubious nutritional merit — has seen such education in action. There is a funny, revealing sequence in which Mr. Spurlock goes to several Mc's restaurants in search of posters and handouts with nutritional information and discovers that they are difficult to find and sometimes not available at all. There is a heartbreaking moment when an overweight girl worries that she will never lose weight because she can't afford to eat two sandwiches a day from Subway, the diet that made Fogle into the chain's favorite spokesman. There are also interviews (some conducted over cheeseburgers and soft drinks) with nutritionists, lawyers and Satcher, the former surgeon general of the United States, all of whom raise alarm about heart disease, juvenile diabetes and other scourges of a society built on cheap, convenient and abundant calories. The arguments in " Super Size Me " will be familiar to readers of Schlosser's best-selling " Fast Food Nation, " and like that book, Mr. Spurlock's film is as much about corporate power as it is about health. His conclusion is that it's us or them, that we should kill Mc's before Mc's kills us. This may be a little melodramatic, but it should nonetheless give you pause. In any case, it seems more likely that we will continue to live in a fast-food world, perhaps more warily (and more queasily) in the wake of Mr. Spurlock's experience. His movie, which opens nationally today, goes down easy and takes a while to digest, but its message is certainly worth the loss of your appetite. SUPER SIZE ME Directed by Spurlock; director of photography, Ambrozy; edited by Stela Gueorguieva and (Bob) Lombardi; music by Steve Horowitz and Parrish; produced by Mr. Spurlock and The Con; released by Roadside Attractions and Goldwyn Films. Running time: 96 minutes. This film is not rated. WITH: Spurlock, Mc, Dr. Daryl Isaacs, Dr. Ganjhu, Dr. Siegel, Bridget , Rowley, andra son and Dr. Satcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.