Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 Hi folks: There is an ambiguity here. What does the " 42% " relate to? I haven't seen the study. But 42% more after age 60 ......... that is, say, living 14.2 more years after age 60 instead of 10.0 more, (or to age 74.2 for the CR mice instead of 70.0 for those unrestricted) isn't all that huge. **If** that is what the 42% means. Rodney. --- In , " Rodney " <perspect1111@y...> wrote: > Hi folks: > > First it was fruit flies that saw an 80% decline in mortality after > being put on CR at 'age 60'. > > Now here is a study on mice. These lived 42% longer after starting > CR at a mouse-age of 19 months (the equivalent of 60 to 65 human > years): > > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/577199.cms > > http://snipurl.com/59bv > > Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.