Guest guest Posted May 24, 2004 Report Share Posted May 24, 2004 Interesting stats. I just wondered about a couple: > - In 1972, we spent 3 billion a year on fast food - today we spend more > than 110 billion What would this be in inflation and population-adjusted dollars? > - Most nutritionists recommend not eating fast food more than once a month That seems extreme. If you can hold it to once a month, then what reason is there to *ever* eat fast food? Even doing CRON I think 2-5 fast food meals a week are possible if you are careful in your portion size and selection. > - 40% of American meals are eaten outside the home That's kind of a silly statistic. I mean, who goes home from work to eat lunch? That's 33% of meals right there. It kind of reminds me of the statistic that 40% of sick days are taken on Monday and Friday. Also, if you order pizza or chinese delivered, does that count as a meal at home? A better statistic would be the percentage of meals *prepared* at home. (|-|ri5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2004 Report Share Posted May 24, 2004 And walmart sells a lot of greasy pastries. The problem is people eat too many calories, don't know how many they eat, drive their car everywhere, don't know what is making them fat, don't know how to get it off, won't attempt to take it off, don't care about living longer, and MOSTLY don't get the message. But CR is about eating less and living longer. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: apricot85 Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 8:37 PM Subject: [ ] SuperSize web site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2004 Report Share Posted May 24, 2004 Hello all, Nice posting. While I must admit that CR has degenerated a little for me during my PhD years (no time to cook, and an evening at the pub seems to be both a professional and personal necessity...), it is nonetheless the overall change in lifestyle that sticks. I'm still below my pre-CR weight, eat a nutritious diet, and am generally fit, mostly by laziness at the point -- ie: I'm too lazy to break the habits I've established since starting CR. Most of these things, however, have become simple patterns over the past 8 years or more that I've been doing CR (though poorly over this past year). I made a point 6 years ago of not owning a car anymore (city dweller now, but was raised in a community where a car was necessary), and to be honest, walking everywhere is actually quite convenient and oddly liberating (I spend a month every summer in Greece, and the idea of walking around town for several hours is just natural). It also prevents me from shopping at Costco, where giant pastries and such proliferate -- if you have to carry it home, chocolate cake doesn't look so good! Not having sugar or salt in the house become habit too, and I miss neither. Same goes for most temptation foods (ice cream & chips for me); when they're not there, you just lose the temptation after a while. It's all about breaking old habits and creating new ones, and once you've created a new habit, it can be hard to break. Cheers, -----Original Message-----From: jwwright [mailto:jwwright@...]Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:14 AM Subject: Re: [ ] SuperSize web site And walmart sells a lot of greasy pastries. The problem is people eat too many calories, don't know how many they eat, drive their car everywhere, don't know what is making them fat, don't know how to get it off, won't attempt to take it off, don't care about living longer, and MOSTLY don't get the message. But CR is about eating less and living longer. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: apricot85 Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 8:37 PM Subject: [ ] SuperSize web site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2004 Report Share Posted May 24, 2004 It's true!! We are friends of another couple of which the husband is quite overweight. Between seeing the Post article, and his not feeling well lately, he's supposedly " reforming " (ha ha). How is he reforming? He recently told me that he actually read the label of a snack cake that he bought from a machine at work. " Wow " he said. " Over 400 calories and it's got all kinds of awful things in it. " So I asked him if he passed on the cake and threw it away. " No, I had already ate it before I read the label " . on 5/24/2004 1:14 PM, jwwright at jwwright@... wrote: > And walmart sells a lot of greasy pastries. > The problem is people eat too many calories, don't know how many they eat, > drive their car everywhere, don't know what is making them fat, don't know how > to get it off, won't attempt to take it off, don't care about living longer, > and MOSTLY don't get the message. > But CR is about eating less and living longer. > > Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2004 Report Share Posted May 24, 2004 I think a lot of folks absolutely " know " what they're doing wrong, but just don't want to change! The information is available, and widely broadcast, daily: eat right and exercise. Simple. But most folks, evidently, would rather enjoy today's donut and sedentary lifestyle rather than eat something less " satisfying " and put out some physical effort for better long term health and well being. Just MO. >From: " jwwright " <jwwright@...> >Reply- >< > >Subject: Re: [ ] SuperSize web site >Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 12:14:14 -0500 > >And walmart sells a lot of greasy pastries. >The problem is people eat too many calories, don't know how many they eat, >drive their car everywhere, don't know what is making them fat, don't know >how to get it off, won't attempt to take it off, don't care about living >longer, and MOSTLY don't get the message. >But CR is about eating less and living longer. > >Regards. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: apricot85 > > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 8:37 PM > Subject: [ ] SuperSize web site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 I agree that some of these "facts" have questionable value. In the movie, they interviewed one guy that loves Big Macs, & eats 2 of them every day. He claims to have eaten more than 19,000 so far. In his case, the guy is not fat because it's the ONLY thing he eats all day long... just 2 big macs & diet soda... no fries, etc. He may not be obese, but surely his cellular nutrition is wanting! Also, the movie included acknowledgment about inactivity ... much time spent driving to work, pick up kids, sit down jobs. chris wrote: That seems extreme. If you can hold it to once a month, then what reason is there to *ever* eat fast food? Even doing CRON I think 2-5 fast food meals a week are possible if you are careful in your portion size and selection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 Yes, the movie discussed everything you said below & then some. Mcs isn't the only one at all. And in the end, the public must overcome all the political, economic, physical, cultural influences. The public must be proactive in choosing nutrition, & exercise despite other influences. At least that was my interpretation of the ending. After the experiment, the guy went into a mostly vagan diet ... with emphasis on the most cleasing veg & fruits & maximize nutrition. jwwright wrote: And walmart sells a lot of greasy pastries. The problem is people eat too many calories, don't know how many they eat, drive their car everywhere, don't know what is making them fat, don't know how to get it off, won't attempt to take it off, don't care about living longer, and MOSTLY don't get the message. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 Yes! I hear the 'oh well, eat it anyway' attitude quite a bit. These people are everwhere, my coworkers. I know one guy, 6ft & 300 lbs, who constantly shocks me with statements of denial: " if I just lost 40 lbs I'd be within a healthy range " and " my cholesterol is only 240 which isn't too much over the 200 they want me to be " . He says his doctor has just told him he needed to lose weight, so he's going to go on a diet. If it matters, this guy has been morbidly obese ALL of his life. I assume obese babies & toddlers have a genetic factor. Still, I assume he is heading for early death. Conversely, I've seen people who diet, lose, regain... over & over & over for decades. They seem frustrated with their inability to maintain the change. I don't lump these folks in the same group as the first paragraph. Dowling wrote: >I think a lot of folks absolutely " know " what they're doing wrong, but just don't want to change! The information is available, and widely broadcast, daily: eat right and exercise. Simple. > >But most folks, evidently, would rather enjoy today's donut and sedentary lifestyle rather than eat something less " satisfying " and put out some physical effort for better long term health and well being. Just MO. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 While I don't wish to defend anyone who eats poop... I had a similar experience myself recently when I didn't read the label until after I already had the product home from the store (not my home.. I was staying with a friend). I found more transfats in some nuts than I would normally consume but I wasn't about to throw the food away after I bought it. I ate it, but I won't buy it again.... If I had better eyesight I might catch such things in the store but like I was in Ca. chillin out.... dude. I believe changing snacking behavior, or any behavior modification is done in small steps. Now he knows that food is not good. The real issue is will he buy it again or pick something healthier. Our internal decision making process is almost like a voting process... the more bad votes a food gets the easier to resist... that's why advertising frequency is so effective at getting us (I mean them) to eat the poop. JR PS: Saw the super-size movie guy in an interview... he's just trying to make a shocking movie, and maybe a buck. There's already 2 or 3 movies in production about people losing weight eating at Mac daddy..... -----Original Message----- From: apricot85 [mailto:apricot85@...] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [ ] SuperSize web site Yes! I hear the 'oh well, eat it anyway' attitude quite a bit. These people are everwhere, my coworkers. I know one guy, 6ft & 300 lbs, who constantly shocks me with statements of denial: " if I just lost 40 lbs I'd be within a healthy range " and " my cholesterol is only 240 which isn't too much over the 200 they want me to be " . He says his doctor has just told him he needed to lose weight, so he's going to go on a diet. If it matters, this guy has been morbidly obese ALL of his life. I assume obese babies & toddlers have a genetic factor. Still, I assume he is heading for early death. Conversely, I've seen people who diet, lose, regain... over & over & over for decades. They seem frustrated with their inability to maintain the change. I don't lump these folks in the same group as the first paragraph. Dowling wrote: >I think a lot of folks absolutely " know " what they're doing wrong, but just don't want to change! The information is available, and widely broadcast, daily: eat right and exercise. Simple. > >But most folks, evidently, would rather enjoy today's donut and sedentary lifestyle rather than eat something less " satisfying " and put out some physical effort for better long term health and well being. Just MO. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 Not that I disagree. but what would be left out if he also took a vitamin pill - known stuff please, not guesses. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: apricot85 Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [ ] SuperSize web site I agree that some of these "facts" have questionable value. In the movie, they interviewed one guy that loves Big Macs, & eats 2 of them every day. He claims to have eaten more than 19,000 so far. In his case, the guy is not fat because it's the ONLY thing he eats all day long... just 2 big macs & diet soda... no fries, etc. He may not be obese, but surely his cellular nutrition is wanting!Also, the movie included acknowledgment about inactivity ... much time spent driving to work, pick up kids, sit down jobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 Hi JW: Since you ask (!) Two Big Macs contain 1200 kcals, 66g fat; 50g protein and 100g carbs. No calories in a large diet Coke. So, to answer your question directly, he is getting his daily needs satisfied for fat and protein, and as you appear to be assuming he gets his essential vitamins and elements from supplements, it would seem that he would be on a nutritionally complete, extreme CR, diet! ????? But he wouldn't be getting those mysterious, presently unknown compounds with anti-cancer properties that are believed to be contained in cruciferous vegetables, etc.. Rodney. --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> wrote: > Not that I disagree. but what would be left out if he also took a vitamin pill - known stuff please, not guesses. > Regards. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: apricot85 > > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:08 PM > Subject: Re: [ ] SuperSize web site > > > I agree that some of these " facts " have questionable value. > > In the movie, they interviewed one guy that loves Big Macs, & eats 2 of them every day. He claims to have eaten more than 19,000 so far. In his case, the guy is not fat because it's the ONLY thing he eats all day long... just 2 big macs & diet soda... no fries, etc. He may not be obese, but surely his cellular nutrition is wanting! > > Also, the movie included acknowledgment about inactivity ... much time spent driving to work, pick up kids, sit down jobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2004 Report Share Posted May 25, 2004 Of which there are hundreds of veggies/fruits with thousands of knowns maybe more thousands of unknowns, many in the world which we don't eat or have access to anyway. The recent study that seems to deflate the fruit value based on measured "markers" is easily debunked, IMO, because I have little faith they are able to choose the right markers. In the short time I've been studying this stuff the markers keep changing and keep getting added to. I have to stick with the fruits/veggies that preclude constipation, avoids allergies and gut pains, etc. And are available. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rodney Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 7:28 AM Subject: [ ] Re: SuperSize web site Hi JW:Since you ask (!)Two Big Macs contain 1200 kcals, 66g fat; 50g protein and 100g carbs. No calories in a large diet Coke.So, to answer your question directly, he is getting his daily needs satisfied for fat and protein, and as you appear to be assuming he gets his essential vitamins and elements from supplements, it would seem that he would be on a nutritionally complete, extreme CR, diet!?????But he wouldn't be getting those mysterious, presently unknown compounds with anti-cancer properties that are believed to be contained in cruciferous vegetables, etc..Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2004 Report Share Posted May 26, 2004 I'm a fan of supplements & vitamins. I support them as much as Walford did. But as you know, the foods provide many nutrients and interactions not yet identified. Al's post on calcium provides one study showing the benefit of calcium from dairy over supplements. IMO, the biggest negative about the a big mac diet is the fats... damaged, trans & no omega 3's. No one has yet identified any safe amount of trans fat. jwwright wrote: Not that I disagree. but what would be left out if he also took a vitamin pill - known stuff please, not guesses. Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2004 Report Share Posted May 27, 2004 One other comment - I got a copy of "life extension" 1982, by Pearson. 858 pages - a "practical" scientific approach (to making money perhaps). Other than the vitamins, the supps he suggests are diff than those touted today. I need the book that will be written in 20 yrs. When I read other books/journals - more medically inclined - they seem to have the same story all the way back to Dr Kellogg 1870. Dr Kempner, Pritikin, Ornish, DASH all stress veggies and fruit, more or less. That story is intact. BTW, the book by Pearson is in the trash. Trans fat I agree is not what I want to eat, but I will allow that if one eats less than they burn, perhaps it all gets burned. Don't overlook the biscuits at Mac's. Biscuits have more bad fat than any french fry. So that leaves the salads, the coffee, and the potty (that's why we stop there). Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: apricot85 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 7:27 AM Subject: Re: [ ] SuperSize web site I'm a fan of supplements & vitamins. I support them as much as Walford did. But as you know, the foods provide many nutrients and interactions not yet identified. Al's post on calcium provides one study showing the benefit of calcium from dairy over supplements. IMO, the biggest negative about the a big mac diet is the fats... damaged, trans & no omega 3's. No one has yet identified any safe amount of trans fat. jwwright wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2004 Report Share Posted May 27, 2004 Hi JW: And maybe leave out the salads too? I once went through the nutrition data for BurgerKing. What item on the menu had the HIGHEST fat content? ........... THE SALADS. Most of it in the dressing, of course. But do many people find lettuce, pretty much on its own, eatable? How many people eat the salads without the dressing? Rodney. --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> wrote: > So that leaves the salads, the coffee, and the potty (that's why we stop there). > > Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2004 Report Share Posted May 27, 2004 Well, I eat " tons " of salad. Of course, one must be carefull with one's choice in dressings. I use mustard, red wine vinegar, horseradish (sans mayo, oil), tomato " soup " , and, sometimes add vege " bacon " bits, a little parmesan cheese, perhaps a touch of cottage cheese or yogurt. Dr. Walford, of course, had many highly nutritious, low cal dressings in his books..... >From: " Rodney " <perspect1111@...> >Reply- > >Subject: [ ] Re: SuperSize web site >Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 13:24:15 -0000 > >Hi JW: > >And maybe leave out the salads too? I once went through the >nutrition data for BurgerKing. What item on the menu had the HIGHEST >fat content? ........... THE SALADS. Most of it in the dressing, >of course. But do many people find lettuce, pretty much on its own, >eatable? How many people eat the salads without the dressing? > >Rodney. > >--- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> >wrote: > > > So that leaves the salads, the coffee, and the potty (that's why we >stop there). > > > > Regards. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2004 Report Share Posted May 27, 2004 I eat no dressing on anything. I use a wine vinegar on salads, that I mix with, guess what - red wine to dilute. The Mac Caesar comes with cheese mixed in. Some may not want that. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rodney Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:24 AM Subject: [ ] Re: SuperSize web site Hi JW:And maybe leave out the salads too? I once went through the nutrition data for BurgerKing. What item on the menu had the HIGHEST fat content? ........... THE SALADS. Most of it in the dressing, of course. But do many people find lettuce, pretty much on its own, eatable? How many people eat the salads without the dressing?Rodney.> So that leaves the salads, the coffee, and the potty (that's why we stop there).> > Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2004 Report Share Posted May 27, 2004 Hi : Thanks for those suggestions for salad dressings. Most of the romaine I eat comes in soup. Either my big thick soup, or in a miso (yes I know about the salt!) soup. It does retain the crunchiness if the soup isn't cooked too long. Rodney. > Well, I eat " tons " of salad. Of course, one must be carefull with one's > choice in dressings. I use mustard, red wine vinegar, horseradish (sans > mayo, oil), tomato " soup " , and, sometimes add vege " bacon " bits, a little > parmesan cheese, perhaps a touch of cottage cheese or yogurt. Dr. Walford, > of course, had many highly nutritious, low cal dressings in his books..... > > > >From: " Rodney " <perspect1111@y...> > >Reply- > > > >Subject: [ ] Re: SuperSize web site > >Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 13:24:15 -0000 > > > >Hi JW: > > > >And maybe leave out the salads too? I once went through the > >nutrition data for BurgerKing. What item on the menu had the HIGHEST > >fat content? ........... THE SALADS. Most of it in the dressing, > >of course. But do many people find lettuce, pretty much on its own, > >eatable? How many people eat the salads without the dressing? > > > >Rodney. > > > >--- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> > >wrote: > > > > > So that leaves the salads, the coffee, and the potty (that's why we > >stop there). > > > > > > Regards. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.