RE: RF & Cataracts

[Guest guest]

> From what I have been reading (while I can still read) is that RF causes eye

damage, which in

> turn causes cataracts. 

Have you looked at calcium deposits as causing eye problems? EMF seems to cause

calcium mobilization/redistribution. Perhaps some phosphorous drops to

eliminate any undesirable calcium deposits? Standard Process makes a supplement

for the eyes called " iPlex " that might be worth checking out.

Marc

[Guest guest]

> From what I have been reading (while I can still read) is that RF causes eye

damage, which in turn causes cataracts. The cataracts msy not show up for many

years, but will eventually show up, from the damage sustained. Therefore, I am

looking into ways to try and heal the damage caused by the RF on my eyes over a

10 year period.

N-acetylcarnosine eye-drops may be worth a try. There has been a bit of Russian

research on this showing this substance causes a reversal of cataracts. Maybe

it would be effective as a preventative, also. If the microwaves are

accelerating the glycosylation process caused by the depletion of antioxidants,

then this may be helpful.

Try searching on " NAC Eye Drops " .

Jim

[Guest guest]

Shortly before my real EHS problems, an eye doctor saw the beginnings of

cataracts in my eyes... I was about 42 years old.

Then I got EHS, started taking vitamins, but drastically reducing

exposure. 4 years later, no sign of cataracts. I don't think it's believed

they are reversible but in my case they seem to be.

I think if you do a lot of driving, shielding the car windows is important.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Marc <marc@...> wrote:

> **

>

>

> > From what I have been reading (while I can still read) is that RF causes

> eye damage, which in

> > turn causes cataracts.

>

> Have you looked at calcium deposits as causing eye problems? EMF seems to

> cause calcium mobilization/redistribution. Perhaps some phosphorous drops to

> eliminate any undesirable calcium deposits? Standard Process makes a

> supplement for the eyes called " iPlex " that might be worth checking out.

>

> Marc

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi,

I have a friend who has been using the herb Bilberry with success. She gets it

from a co here called: Good Herbs. (www.Goodherbs.com ) ** Taken from the book:

A Practical Guide to Herbs and Natural Supplements " by n D. and G.

Lee Pemberton.

Bilberry application: strengthens the eyes, improves and restores eyesight/ good

for cataracts, macular degeneration, cloudy vision/ free radical scavenger

antioxidant/ source of Vit C/ contains bioflavonoids which strenghten

capillaries and veins/

While I don't have any personal experience with Bilberry, I have used the above

co's herbal products and they are of high quality. She takes the liq herbal

drops in water and drinks, and has been using Bilberry for the past 6 months and

tells me her eye problems are much improved.

Lizzie

From: superdrove@...

Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:04:45 -0700

Subject: RF & Cataracts

Hi folks,

It was mentioned that one of the symptoms of microwave exposure can be eye pain

or pressure. I myself experienced severe eye pain and pressure living near a

cell tower. It felt like my eyes were going to pop. I have moved away from the

direct beam, but am still getting expousre to RF, although I do not feel pain in

my eyes now. But, I notice my vision getting more blurry and my eyes feel more

sticky, even though I use drops often.

From what I have been reading (while I can still read) is that RF causes eye

damage, which in turn causes cataracts. The cataracts msy not show up for many

years, but will eventually show up, from the damage sustained. Therefore, I am

looking into ways to try and heal the damage caused by the RF on my eyes over a

10 year period.

I am wondering if anyone has tried antioxidant or melatonin drops in the eyes or

if that is even possible? Does anyone know of ways to heal the eyes from

sustained RF damage? It appears that the RF depleat the antioxidants from the

lens causing free radical damage. But since the lens has poor circulation, how

do you get antioxidants to nourish the lens and heal it, other than drops?

http://www.online-eye-info.com/1-exposure-to-microwave-radiation-and-cataract.ht\

ml

Cataract means opacification of the natural human lens. It has been reported

that chronic exposure to low power microwave radiation can affect the

transparency of natural lens because these radiations can affect the biological

and biochemical functions of lens's epithelial cells which are responsible for

keeping the lens clear. Lenses with damaged epithelial cells can form

opacification which leads to formation of radiation cataract

Here is an exerpt from an article that explains part of what is happening:

One well-understood effect of microwave radiation is dielectric heating, in

which any dielectric material (such as living tissue) is heated by rotations of

polar molecules induced by the electromagnetic field. In the case of a person

using a cell phone, most of the heating effect will occur at the surface of the

head, causing its temperature to increase by a fraction of a degree. In this

case, the level of temperature increase is an order of magnitude less than that

obtained during the exposure of the head to direct sunlight. The brain's blood

circulation is capable of disposing of excess heat by increasing local blood

flow. However, the cornea of the eye does not have this temperature regulation

mechanism and exposure of 2–3 hours duration has been reported to produce

cataracts in rabbits' eyes at SAR values from 100-140W/kg, which produced

lenticular temperatures of 41°C.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health

Read the following article for scientific proof that microwaves cause cataracts,

(as well as chromosome damage, leakage of albumin into blood brain barrier,

suicidal tendencies, etc.):

" Cataract as a side effect of unprotected exposure to microwave

hyperthermia treatment of breast cancer. "

By Dr Neil Cherry O.N.Z.M1

Associate Professor of Environmental Health

Lincoln University, New Zealand

<snip>

Many years ago it was stated that “In humans, cases of microwave-induced

cataract are well documented”, Birenbaum et al. (1969). They go on to state:

“Early stages of this lens

opacification process are termed incipient cataract, a condition which may lie

dormant for long periods of time without materially reducing visual capability.

Eventually, the opacification spread through the lens substance and becomes

denser. This results in the loss of useful vision at which time the condition is

recognized clinically as cataract. Ultimately, microwave-induced cataracts

result in blindness.”

Hence as early as the 1960’s it was well-established that microwaves induced

optical damage of eyes leading to cataracts.

..C.

Superdrove

[Guest guest]

I read the eye uses the most vit C of the body. Billberry is very good. They can

blur from too much salt too. Watch your intake.

What about a little organic coconut oil in the eyes. Antimicrobial & anti fungal

properties.

Kathy

[Guest guest]

> According to an article I read on the Organic Consumers Association website,

> a lawsuit was filed in San Francisco Superior Court against Standard Process

> makers of Iplex for the safety of the product , because it contains cow parts:

> eyes, kidneys, livers, bones and brains, where BSE or Mad Cow Disease, is

> most highly concentrated.

>

> I do not know the outcome of the lawsuit, but I know that animal parts are

> not very well regulated in this country and I hesitate to use this product

> for that reason. 

That lawsuit must have failed, since that was 10 years ago and I've purchased

a bottle of iPlex just this year... :-)

But yes, some people refuse to use Standard Process because of a fear of

Mad Cow's disease. Although Mad Cow hasn't gotten a lot of press lately,

has it?

Marc

[Guest guest]

Hi Marc and All,

I have used glandulars since the late 70s.  Allopathic doctors reviled them

then for the same reason: cross-over viruses.  (Which rarely ever happened.) 

I am not saying Mad Cow Disease is not a potential threat, it is.  However, one

needs to be careful as to where the supplement company is getting their

glands.  The very good glandular supplement companies would be careful about

such things.  This is, after all, how they make their money.  They would not

be in business very long if even one person came down with Mad Cow Disease.

My 2 cents,

Diane

________________________________

From: Marc <marc@...>

Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:27 AM

Subject: Re: RF & Cataracts

 

> According to an article I read on the Organic Consumers Association website,

> a lawsuit was filed in San Francisco Superior Court against Standard Process

> makers of Iplex for the safety of the product , because it contains cow parts:

> eyes, kidneys, livers, bones and brains, where BSE or Mad Cow Disease, is

> most highly concentrated.

>

> I do not know the outcome of the lawsuit, but I know that animal parts are

> not very well regulated in this country and I hesitate to use this product

> for that reason. 

That lawsuit must have failed, since that was 10 years ago and I've purchased

a bottle of iPlex just this year... :-)

But yes, some people refuse to use Standard Process because of a fear of

Mad Cow's disease. Although Mad Cow hasn't gotten a lot of press lately,

has it?

Marc