Guest guest Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 whatever the ambient reading is I guess that is the main reading, I guess that the most powerful emf will ramp up the meter however multiple scources will no doubgt compound issues multiple scuorces multiple frequencies multiple effects in the long run puk In a message dated 09/10/2011 03:13:11 GMT Daylight Time, olsonand rew96@... writes: I believe I am Esensitive. When I am on the computer for too long, drive in a car, or am in front of an old TV, are the major culprits. When I stay away from any kind of EMF for 3 days, I fee half as bad. My question is. Do EMFs stack, or compound? Example. Say Im in 5 gauss from computer monitor, and my mouse and keyboard give off 5 gauss each as well. Am I in 15 gauss, or 5? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2011 Report Share Posted October 10, 2011 > My question is. Do EMFs stack, or compound? > > Example. Say Im in 5 gauss from computer monitor, and my mouse and keyboard give off 5 gauss > each as well. Am I in 15 gauss, or 5? I'm not sure if you're asking the right question -- a simple gauss reading is not going to give you the whole picture with regard to health effects. Very likely your computer monitor is putting out all sorts of frequencies that your meter is not reading. And your mouse and keyboard are most likely emitting RF noise that originates from your computer, which is also not registering on your meter. Now, certainly the damage from EMF is cumulative -- that is, if you can reduce your exposure in one place, then your tolerance may improve somewhere else. But it's not as simple as adding the readings on your meter. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2011 Report Share Posted October 10, 2011 One may think that there is a correlation as simple as adding the readings. It is very complex. I have done various experiments with various frequencies and intensities. First there is no linear correlation between intensity and biological effect, it is logarithmic. Second it is not so much the carrier frequency that does the harm but the ELF modulation or pulsing of this frequency; so the same carrier frequency at the same intensitiy may have different effects due to a different pulsing rate. Third there is a phenomenon called the biological window; it means that biological effect occur only within a certain range of intensity, not below a certain threshold and not above a certain higher threshold; that is what a window means. Fourth to wich frequencies one has a negative reaction, from experience in this forum we know, is individually different. In consequence this means whatever your reading is, you never can say how harmful the effect of this radiation will be. Naturally when you have several sources of radiation the chance that some of these are specificly harmful increases, but you never can say exactly from technical readings how harmful they are. So any readings are just an indication that there possibly could be harm. This opens the door to all kinds of speculations that lead nowhere. dietrich In einer eMail vom 10.10.2011 19:06:53 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt marc@...: > My question is. Do EMFs stack, or compound? > > Example. Say Im in 5 gauss from computer monitor, and my mouse and keyboard give off 5 gauss > each as well. Am I in 15 gauss, or 5? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.