Guest guest Posted May 6, 2004 Report Share Posted May 6, 2004 If I am reading this article correctly it says the fatter you are the less risk you have to of developing age-related maculopathy, or, is it the opposite? Here's the link: http://www.docguide.com/news/content.nsf/news/8525697700573E1885256E8 6007156CA Here's the article: DGDispatch ARVO: Study Finds Link Between Body Fat and Macular Pigmentation By Mike Fillon FORT LAUDERDALE, FL -- April 30, 2004 -- The higher the percentage of body fat, the less likely someone will be to have inadequate macular pigmentation, which protects against age-related maculopathy (ARM.), according to study results presented here on April 27th in a poster session at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting. There have been many risk factors for ARM, including age, female gender, obesity, light iris color, smoking, family history, low dietary, and blood levels of arytenoids, according to presenter Orla O'Donovan, PhD, Chemical & Life Sciences Department., Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland, United Kingdom,. To investigate the relationship between the percentage of body fat, serum concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin, and MPOD, Dr. O'Donovan and colleagues enrolled 100 healthy Caucasian subjects between the ages of 22 and 60 years. Subjects answered a questionnaire of 166 specific foods or food types divided into 19 groups. The researchers extracted serum L and Z with heptane using tocopherol acetate as an internal standard. Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) was measured psychophysically using a maculometer. Body composition measurements were calculated using dual energy x- ray absorptiometry, callipers for skinfold thickness, bioelectric impedance absorptiometry -- which is used to estimate body composition including percentage body fat, lean body mass and total body water. Waist-hip ratio and body mass index (BMI) were also measured for all subjects. The researchers discovered MPOD was positively and significantly related to serum levels of lutein and to dietary intake of zeaxanthin. Dietary fat intake was inversely related to serum lutein and zeaxanthin -- and significantly for lutein -- but was not related to MPOD. " As a result, we have confirmed a gender-independent, significant and inverse relationship between percentage body fat and [MPOD], which is attenuated to borderline significance when corrected for age, " said Dr. O'Donovan. " Measures of body fat showed high levels of agreement, and an easily demonstrable inverse relationship with [MPOD] when compared with measures of body composition such as BMI and waist-hip ratio, indicating that measures of adiposity should be used for further study. " Dr. O'Donovan said the study also showed dietary and serum levels of lutein and zeaxanthin are significantly and positively related to MPOD, but significantly and inversely related to adiposity. She said the results also demonstrated an inverse relationship between dietary intake of fat and serum levels of lutein and zeaxanthin. " All of our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that a relative lack of macular pigment, or serum [lutein] and/or [zeaxanthin], may underlie the increased risk of progression of ARM associated with dietary and body fat, " she said. [Presentation title: " Advances in Imaging and Macular Pigments I Macular pigment optical density, and serum and dietary lutein and zeaxanthin, in healthy subjects with and without a family history of Age - Related Maculopathy. " Poster #B-602] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.