Guest guest Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 Geez it would be nice if these really did work! Let us know if you buy one! Loni From: emraware <emraware@...> Subject: Low EMF display Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 4:28 PM  There ought to be some cheaper monitors if you do some online shopping. Try to get a TCO compliant LCD flat panel display: http://www.tcodevelopment.com/pls/nvp/Document.Show?CID=4146 & MID=467 Benefits: " Reduced electric and magnetic fields " " Low user exposure to electromagnetic fields " I believe the max exposure is around 2 mG. For max comfort, check for .29 mm dot pitch or better supporting 75 Hz frequency with 1200x1024 or better resolution. I'm guessing the regular AVI interface might be more tolerable than the DVI interface, but I don't know for sure. > > I have found a company that produces low emf monitors, televisions and other useful products. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 > For max comfort, check for .29 mm dot pitch or better supporting 75 Hz > frequency with 1200x1024 or better resolution. I'm guessing the regular > AVI interface might be more tolerable than the DVI interface, but I don't > know for sure. My experience is different... - the less the resolution is, the better. In this case, resolution is determined by the video card output (set in the operating system), not the actual resolution of the monitor. - the lower the refresh rate, the better (60 khz looks fine on an LCD, although you'd probably need 70+ khz on a CRT) - larger screens are good, because you can move them further away from you and still see them. I used HDTV's as computer monitors, as they are large and low-resolution compared to " real " computer monitors. - I do think the old 15-pin VGA video cable interface is more tolerable than a DVI or HDMI cable. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 TCO certification seems like a good idea, but for monitors I'm afraid it's useless... unless you are sitting very close what matters is the RF radiation and their standards are the same for that as all other monitors. For keyboards it might make mores sense, but even there they should add RF limits. A lot of people do need faster refresh for their eyes to be happy, though for me it's not a huge issue. Bill On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Marc <marc@...> wrote: > ** > > > > For max comfort, check for .29 mm dot pitch or better supporting 75 Hz > > frequency with 1200x1024 or better resolution. I'm guessing the regular > > AVI interface might be more tolerable than the DVI interface, but I don't > > know for sure. > > My experience is different... > > - the less the resolution is, the better. In this case, resolution is > determined by the video card output (set in the operating system), > not the actual resolution of the monitor. > > - the lower the refresh rate, the better (60 khz looks fine on an LCD, > although you'd probably need 70+ khz on a CRT) > > - larger screens are good, because you can move them further away from > you and still see them. I used HDTV's as computer monitors, as they > are large and low-resolution compared to " real " computer monitors. > > - I do think the old 15-pin VGA video cable interface is more tolerable > than a DVI or HDMI cable. > > Marc > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.