Guest guest Posted June 14, 2004 Report Share Posted June 14, 2004 Hi folks: Well Al sent me the PDF of the study Apricot had pointed out to us. MANY thanks to Al, and to Apricot. That is a very interesting study. Although a fair amount of the terminology is beyond my pay grade, with the help of a medical dictionary I think I get the message. There are apparently dozens of studies in animals that show that if they are fed calcium supplements, or to an even greater extent dairy products, they have much reduced body fat compared with a calcium deficiency. The following direct quote purports to explain why: " ..... the suppression of these hormones via increases in dietary calcium facilitates repartition of dietary energy from lipid storage to lipid oxidation and thermogenesis " . Translated into language I can understand I think that means calcium causes more fat to be burned resulting in a higher body temperature. It also says it has been shown that additional calcium promotes the death of fat cells in mice. And it notes that one mouse study showed that the effects were much greater when non-fat dry milk was used than when CaCO3 (chalk, as in most calcium supplements) was used as the source of calcium. So the fat component in milk is not necessary, apparently. But they do not disclose the milk products they used in their own study!!! They did say that whey has been shown to have these effects. (Yes. I can hear you asking ....... what kind of whey was it? They don't say.) They also mention that some studies show some build up in muscle associated with the loss of fat. This makes me wonder if I shouldn't do a test on myself and get some fat-free yoghurt, eat it Friday and Saturday (so that when I fall asleep it is on the weekend) and see if there is any noticeable effect on my body temperature. It also raises the issue of how many calories per day must be being burned off by the presence of the additional calcium for the loss of weight they observed. More on that in another post. Rodney. > > >>From reading the abstract I am not certain that another possibility might not be that the consumption of milk products diminished appetite and overall caloric intake, and thereby adipose tissue. > > > > I do not see how there could be a " might " about " diminished caloric > intake " . Calorie restriction was definitely a part of the study, & was > measured (for 24 weeks). > > Appetite response of the participants (due to calorie restriction or the > foods provided) were not mentioned as a focus in the study. Whether or > not their reduced caloric intake was voluntary (due to a diminished > appetite) is not the point in the summary. > > The point of the study is that " dietary calcium significantly augmented > weight and fat loss secondary to caloric restriction and increased the > percentage of fat lost from the trunk region, whereas dairy products > exerted a substantially greater effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.