Guest guest Posted June 9, 2004 Report Share Posted June 9, 2004 Fasting like everything else will highlight the differences between individuals. Some can easily forgo all energy intake for days, easily transitioning to a fat and/or protein burning metabolism to keep the brain supplied with energy. Some people will suffer severe discomfort at the first tingle of dropping blood sugar. Different strokes. As has already been pointed out, some of the apparent weight loss from fasting is temporary depletion of glycogen stores (which also frees up associated water weight). I had never heard the distinction of " water " and " juice " fasting. While I haven't researched this, couldn't you drink enough high calorie fruit juice to gain weight, while fasting? All that aside, I have fasted before and while not a regular scheduled activity (for me), I believe there is merit in periodically resting the body's digestive system. I won't offer an opinion on what an appropriate period is. Local digestive flora are likely to be severely disrupted by an extended period of zero energy intake, perhaps good if your local flora needs shaking up. As with all things, moderation and find the path that works for you. I would be very surprised if any one strategy was ideal or even tolerable to all. YMMV. JR -----Original Message----- From: Francesca Skelton [mailto:fskelton@...] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 9:10 AM support group Subject: Re: [ ] Re: fasting for long periods (was Re: YourDaily eating Habits) Hopefully we're all fans of the evidence. And hopefully open to new evidence and not " locked in " (or we wouldn't have much to discuss on this list). At least one person I know (myself) would lose lots of weight on a 2 week fast. During times in my life when I had little appetite for example, I dropped scads of weight . I did not look upon this as beneficial for my health, but admittedly those were times of ill health and not necessarily the same as a period of intentional fasting. I become sick to my stomach if I fast so I interpret this as a body signal that it doesn't take kindly to fasting. In the spirit of healthy debate, you can't dismiss Walford's studies on rats and then mention that " bears hibernate " (and that they fast during their hibernation) to bolster the argument that it's beneficial for humans to fast. on 6/9/2004 9:42 AM, Jeff Novick at jnovick@... wrote: ________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by Internet Pathway's Email Gateway scanning system for potentially harmful content, such as viruses or spam. Nothing out of the ordinary was detected in this email. For more information, call 601-776-3355 or email support@... ________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2004 Report Share Posted June 9, 2004 >>I had never heard the distinction of " water " and " juice " fasting. While I haven't researched this, couldn't you drink enough high calorie fruit juice to gain weight, while fasting? Technically, you are correct. True fasting is the abstention from food and beverage except for water. Juice or fruit " fasting " are really juice and fruit " diets " but many uese them as modified fasts as they typcially reduce their caloric intake substantially while following them. My guess is you could drink enough juice to gain weight, but it might be difficult. A typical 8 oz of orange juice is about 110 calories. So, to get around 2500 or 3000 calories would be 22 - 27 eight oz glassed. Doable, but probably difficlut. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2004 Report Share Posted June 9, 2004 Yes, I suspect most here can do the math. I looked into this a little around a year ago, and even experimented some with " carb Fasting " where I eliminated carbohydrates only for 24+ hour periods (still have ketostix left over). My interest was in the effects of fasting vis a vis the insulin pathway as reducing blood sugar should rest the insulin system and perhaps improve insulin sensitivity. In that context drinking high GI fruit juice during a fast would seem counter productive. Kind of like my favorite TV ad for an " effortless " exercise machine. Fasting while maintaining high blood sugar will surely diminish that part of the benefit. I don't mean to diminish withholding energy sources from digestive biotics is a different and important vector. I have heard more good than bad about fasting but haven't personally formed a strong opinion, or incorporated it into my normal patterns. I do recall entering a peaceful state when there wasn't a bunch of food gurgling around down there, but I enjoy eating even more. Regarding the attempts to draw parallels with bears hibernating. It appear the general public is well on its way in building up their fat stores, unfortunately they won't wake up from any obesity induced " big sleep " . Live long and well.. JR -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Novick [mailto:jnovick@...] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 10:38 AM Subject: RE: [ ] Re: fasting for long periods >>I had never heard the distinction of " water " and " juice " fasting. While I haven't researched this, couldn't you drink enough high calorie fruit juice to gain weight, while fasting? Technically, you are correct. True fasting is the abstention from food and beverage except for water. Juice or fruit " fasting " are really juice and fruit " diets " but many uese them as modified fasts as they typcially reduce their caloric intake substantially while following them. My guess is you could drink enough juice to gain weight, but it might be difficult. A typical 8 oz of orange juice is about 110 calories. So, to get around 2500 or 3000 calories would be 22 - 27 eight oz glassed. Doable, but probably difficlut. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2004 Report Share Posted June 9, 2004 Rodney, sounds good, let's do it. OK, now who has about 200 adolescent mice? (|-|ri5 > > One study that, IMO, needs to be done is animals restricted to > various different degrees to try to determine the shape of the CR > benefit curve. I.E. where is life extension maximized? At 40% > restriction? Or 70%? Or 38%? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2004 Report Share Posted June 9, 2004 Rodney, I agree 100% also, Right now, there are so many variables and unanswered questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.