Guest guest Posted June 26, 2004 Report Share Posted June 26, 2004 I apologize in advance if this is off-topic, but it seems to me to relate to CR. I was recently pondering the obesity problem in the U.S. (I'm starting to get worried about my parents and other relatives who have been struggling with weight for years), and believe that one of the prime causes of this problem is the wide availability of (relative to many other countries) inexpensive food. I haven't researched this in depth, but in keeping my ear to the ground I am coming to the conclusion that agricultural subsidies ought to have more people against them than just libertarians. I wonder if the government stopped messing with price controls and subsidies to keep farming profitable, whether a better equilibrium might be found naturally. Yes, a lot of farmers might have to find other work, but why should farmers have a safety net that, say, tech workers don't have? The upshot would be that the market would control food prices, and probably those prices would go up because there would be fewer farms. Higher prices across the board would mean that organically grown foods suddenly wouldn't seem so expensive, and people might eat healthier. More expensive food also might mean that people would restrict their intake for financial reasons, or even grow their own food. Am I wrong in thinking this way? I understand that this topic relates only tangentially to CR, so I won't be offended if we take it off-list. (|-|ri5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.