Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Walk, Don't Run

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

-----Original Message-----

From: aequalsz [mailto:aequalsz@...]

S

Subject: [ ] Walk, Don't Run

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/31/health/31exer.html

(Free subscription available)

VITAL SIGNS

Exercise: Walk, Don't Run, the Knees Say

By MARY DUENWALD

" In running, the leg must compress and extend like a pogo stick, "

said

Dr. J. , an assistant professor of biology at Brown

University and an author of the study. " In walking you conserve

energy

because you move like an inverted pendulum. You sort of pole-vault

over your legs. "

------------------------------------------------------------------

Well that's interesting. Always have read that the calories expended

for walking or running a mile were roughly equal. So according to

the article you get more bang for your buck by running three miles as

opposed to walking three miles. And if you run on a treadmill with

a flexible surface, like I do, you'll probably have no problems with

your knees. So run don't walk - just do it mostly with a flexible

surfaced treadmill.

Aequalsz

================================

Well I don't know about " pogo stick " but yes there is a difference between

running and walking. There is somewhat lower efficiency because of doing the

work faster.

The simplest way to look at this is that the work you are doing is not from

moving forward, but from lifting your body weight with each step. Runners

lift their bodies higher with each step than walkers, thus doing more work

(per step). This is somewhat mitigated by covering more distance with each

stride but I expect there to be a slight but measurable work difference

between running and walking.

If you watch an experienced race walker you will notice that their body

barely moves up and down at all. Of course a race walker is still doing work

even if their body doesn't move in the vertical but it is a factor.

An extreme example of this is riding a bicycle on a level road which

involves no " work " other than overcoming the rolling resistance of the

tires.

JR

PS: My favorite TV ad these days is for a new exercise machine that promises

a complete full body workout " effortlessly " LOL..... I've already got an

effortless exercise machine it's called a couch :-)

________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by Internet Pathway's Email

Gateway scanning system for potentially harmful content,

such as viruses or spam. Nothing out of the ordinary was

detected in this email. For more information, call

601-776-3355 or email support@...

________________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> The simplest way to look at this is that the work you are doing is

not from

> moving forward, but from lifting your body weight with each step.

Runners

> lift their bodies higher with each step than walkers, thus doing

more work

> (per step). This is somewhat mitigated by covering more distance

with each

> stride but I expect there to be a slight but measurable work

difference

> between running and walking.

>

> If you watch an experienced race walker you will notice that their

body

> barely moves up and down at all. Of course a race walker is still

doing work

> even if their body doesn't move in the vertical but it is a factor.

>

That's also true for marathon runners. The elite runners have very

little vertical motion compared to most of us, run of the mill

joggers. At the other end of the spectrum (of runners) are the

sprinters who take absolutely huge vertical leaps with each stride.

They generally aren't too concerned with minimizing overall energy

expenditures as are the marathon runners though. Actually at the

longer sprinting distances, such as the 200 and 400 meters, it is

advantageous to minimize energy expended, perhaps why

, with his rigid upright stride may have been the best 200

and 400 meter athlete ever.

Of course with sprinting, much larger forces are generated versus

when marathon running. (I think someone on this web site mentioned

that the laws of thermodynamics are always obeyed even for

biological systems. Although no - or negligible - mechanical work

is done holding a 5 pound weight stationary at arm's length for a

hour, internal energy is expended in generating the force required

to do so and is most likely manifested as heat energy.) Maybe this

is why sprinters tend to retire at an earlier age than marathon

runners.

Aequalsz

________________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> In a message dated 9/4/04 1:33:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

> aequalsz@y... writes:

>

> > Maybe this

> > is why sprinters tend to retire at an earlier age than marathon

> > runners.

> >

>

> I believe it's because speed declines with age more than other

physical

> attributes, like endurance or strength, do.

>

> --

>

> Ken

I believe you are correct. Anyway the reason for my last post was

(in a spirit of jest) to shown that I can " non sequitur " along with

the best of em. Comes natural to me.

Aequalsz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--- In , " john roberts " <johnhrob@n...>

wrote:

> While I'm not sure what this has to do with CR, yes sprinters are

less

> efficient that distance runners. They also use upper body strength,

swinging

> their arms to counter their bodies up-down motion.

>

> I suspect their earlier burnout is due to difficulties in

maintaining high

> levels of fast twitch muscle, but I'm just guessing.

>

> JR

>

According to,

http://www.theharrier.com/B.html

" Avoiding serious injury and the resulting training breaks, said the

University of Colorado's Mazzeo, professor of kinesiology and

applied physiology, has enabled to continue producing

sufficient human growth hormone to stimulate muscle mass and the high

percentage of fast-twitch muscle fiber needed in sprinting. "

On a personal note, I try to keep my HGH supply high by ending my

treadmill runs with a 150 yard " sprint " . Read somewhere

that high intensity exercise promotes the production of HGH but I

don't know how effectively it does this. Anyway the treadmill

" sprinting " at least tends to break up the monotony.

Aequalsz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...