Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 Hi JW: I would like to quote an excerpt from what you said in your post #13417 to reinforce my point about your WC/H ratio: > > ................................. are trying to deal with a > metabolic problem that probably all of us have, some more, some less I entirely agree that we all have a 'metabolic problem' to some degree or other, " some more, some less " as you said. In other words, I am confident that EVERY ONE OF US is susceptible. I suggest the degree to which each of us EXHIBITS that problem depends on HOW MUCH WE EAT, and that it is that - how much we eat - that causes our resulting physiological data, like WC/H, BMI, WBC, BP, BF% and LDL-C etc. etc.. Take the example of the guy who decided he wanted to 'do a number' on Mcs by eating 5000 calories a day of their food for a month. He was (comparatively) healthy before he started. After a month he was demonstrably a lot less healthy. Of course he wanted to blame that on Mcs food. But he proved nothing of the kind. Eating 5000 calories a day of **anything** for a month straight while avoiding exercise, as he did, is likely to make anyone thoroughly unhealthy. Had he instead eaten a 40% restricted number of calories of Mcs food for thirty days he might have started to show benefits of CR (although I do not doubt that Mcs' fare is deficient in some key nutrients, but the signs of that would likely not show up in just one month). So I believe that in your case your physiological data are simply evidence that you are eating too many calories. Just like the TV 'documentary' reporter was - but clearly not in so extreme a fashion as he was. If the reporter were now to restrict his calories to 40% below maintenance level, his signs of ill health will, almost certainly, promptly disappear. I believe that if you continue to restict your calories to a level a little below what you are burning off each day your 'signs of ill health' (BP) will disappear also. If you take another look at the data in Francesca's WC/H table in the database, your numbers do stick out from the crowd. Both your WC/H and BMI are way higher than any others on that list. And some on that list are not especially slim! Naturally, I may be mistaken. But to me the conclusion seems obvious. You are still eating far too much! My bet is that your WC/H ratio (as well as all the others) will tell you when you are not. Hope this is helpful. It is meant to be! Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.