Guest guest Posted December 27, 2006 Report Share Posted December 27, 2006 SST 1964 et al, Zeolite Natural Cellular Defense is a great marketing ploy more than anything. There are several substances that provide a “matrix” for removing heavy metals from the body. This includes heavy clays like bentonite, “green stuff” like barley, wheat, rye and other sprouted grasses, algae and various marine shells and exoskeletons. Most dried plant products, raw vegetables and some raw fruits are almost, and probably just, as effective and far more economical. There are also a number of heavy metal “chelating” products and foot baths on the market designed to remove heavy metals from the body. They all work. So does ZNCD, dirt, clay and green stuff. But, in my opinion, the best and most economical product is Mother Nature’s own raw veggies and dried plant parts used as fiber. The truth is heavy metals collect in the bodies of people who have a low fiber and high sugar diet. Sugar attracts heavy metals and fiber removes it from the body. Increase the amount of fiber and reduce the amount of sugar in their diet and most heavy metal problems resolve themselves. Why not place the frequency for removing toxic metals from the body in the fiber product of your client’s choice? Pardon my confusion. EPFX/SCIO owners have at their fingertips the greatest technology available to help people improve their health. Yet these same owners seem to be very gullible when it comes to the hype and self-serving claims of many so-called natural therapy interventions. My suggestion is to think “natural” first and SCIO next. Peace, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 As one who has had more than my share of heavy metal issues I can tell you that chlorella can be nasty as can cilantro. There are those who are sensitive to frequencies (you can't understand this until you experience it for yourself). Zeolite is a great product and just because it's MLM doesn't mean it's a " ploy. " Zeolite has worked for people who've tried everything including green drinks, raw food diets, etc. Heavy metals can lodge in brain and fat tissue in the healthiest of people. It's not a good idea to generalize. My mantra is " Learn how to muscle test and ask the body what it wants. " Most of the heavy metal products are on the market are really expensive and I think the zeolite products (including clay) give you the best deal. Just because something is " natural " doesn't mean that a person isn't going to get a serious detox reaction. This is what separates the superior practitioner from the average one -- never take anything for granted until you test it. Including the water a person drinks. is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC " Gilbert " <drjohngilbert@...> wrote: > > SST 1964 et al, > > > > Zeolite Natural Cellular Defense is a great marketing ploy more than > anything. There are several substances that provide a " matrix " for removing > heavy metals from the body. This includes heavy clays like bentonite, > " green stuff " like barley, wheat, rye and other sprouted grasses, algae and > various marine shells and exoskeletons. Most dried plant products, raw > vegetables and some raw fruits are almost, and probably just, as effective > and far more economical. > > > > There are also a number of heavy metal " chelating " products and foot baths > on the market designed to remove heavy metals from the body. They all work. > So does ZNCD, dirt, clay and green stuff. But, in my opinion, the best and > most economical product is Mother Nature's own raw veggies and dried plant > parts used as fiber. > > > > The truth is heavy metals collect in the bodies of people who have a low > fiber and high sugar diet. Sugar attracts heavy metals and fiber removes it > from the body. Increase the amount of fiber and reduce the amount of sugar > in their diet and most heavy metal problems resolve themselves. > > > > Why not place the frequency for removing toxic metals from the body in the > fiber product of your client's choice? > > > > Pardon my confusion. EPFX/SCIO owners have at their fingertips the greatest > technology available to help people improve their health. Yet these same > owners seem to be very gullible when it comes to the hype and self-serving > claims of many so-called natural therapy interventions. My suggestion is to > think " natural " first and SCIO next. > > > > Peace, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.