RE: Birth details, longevity and aging rate

[Guest guest]

What of men? Do similar trends hold for them?

>From: " old542000 " <apater@...>

>Reply-

>

>Subject: [ ] Birth details, longevity and aging rate

>Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:55:09 -0000

>

>Hi All,

>

>Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS.

> Early-life programming of aging and longevity: the idea of high

>initial damage

>load (the HIDL hypothesis).

>Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1019:496-501.

>PMID: 15247073 [PubMed - in process]

>

>seems to say in the pdf-available text that women lifespan data

>indicates they

>will live 3+ years longer if born in December versus January and over

>6 years longer

>if their father at age of her birth is 30 versus more that 54 years

>old.

>

>Cheers, Alan Pater

>

[Guest guest]

Hi All,

Men were not examined, .

Cheers, Al Pater.

> What of men? Do similar trends hold for them?

>

>

> >From: " old542000 " <apater@m...>

> >Reply-

> >

> >Subject: [ ] Birth details, longevity and aging rate

> >Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:55:09 -0000

> >

> >Hi All,

> >

> >Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS.

> > Early-life programming of aging and longevity: the idea of high

> >initial damage

> >load (the HIDL hypothesis).

> >Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1019:496-501.

> >PMID: 15247073 [PubMed - in process]

> >

> >seems to say in the pdf-available text that women lifespan data

> >indicates they

> >will live 3+ years longer if born in December versus January and

over

> >6 years longer

> >if their father at age of her birth is 30 versus more that 54 years

> >old.

> >

> >Cheers, Alan Pater

> >