Guest guest Posted July 31, 2004 Report Share Posted July 31, 2004 I am still thinking about the paper posted by Dowling about Intermittent Fasting and caloric restriction. http://snipurl.com/4d7w Nobody commented on my post (Message 13677) which pointed out what were some interesting facts in the publication, although there have been some questions on terminology like " Is there such a thing as non-intermittent fasting? " , to which the answer is: yes, it happens after death. But seriously, to make good use of Walford's ideas, I feel that one of the hardest issues we have to address is knowing how much to eat (CR), and there is also the problem of knowing what to eat (Optimum Nutrition), but ON is a secondary problem. In animal experiments, CR is defined as the percent of reduction in food provided to a group of animals, compared to the amount of food that a control group eats ad libitum. Typical experiments start CR at an early stage in the animal's life. For mice, food is generally provided ad libitum until 9 weeks of age, which would be the equivalent to starting a CR program at the human age of 8. Because the diet is well balanced, no nutritional deficiencies develop, and the calorically restricted mice have extended life spans compared to the ones that are not restricted. However, adult mice that are on limited daily feeding regimens and consume 40% less food than those that are fed ad libitum have 49% lower body weights. In human terms this would mean that an adult person subjected to a CR diet from an early age would weigh 76 pounds compared to 150 pounds for one whose diet was unrestricted. We all started our CR programs after reaching maturity. Therefore, we are big compared to how we would be if we had started CR before puberty. The growing body adjusts to CR by producing a smaller body, just like a maple planted in a small pot will stay small and become a bonzai. A small, 76-pound person will have smaller caloric requirements than a 150-pound person and will be able to survive and thrive on 40% fewer calories than the big person. What would happen to the 150-pound person if he/she were placed on a 40% CR diet? The results would probably be detrimental as mentioned in BT120YD. To me it seems obvious that the calories consumed by adults should not be below the number of calories required to support the base metabolism and physical activity once a healthy BMI has been attained (between 21 and 22). The consequence of consuming fewer calories, once an optimum weight has been reached, means that some necessary body tissues will be sacrificed and this loss may eventually lead to health problems. Intermittent Fasting (eating on alternate days) seems to provide the long life that we seek, and this may be a better way of achieving longevity than reducing the calories below those required by our base metabolism. Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.