Guest guest Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 But more and more modern research is evolving the picture of a healthy diet that is remarkably similar, if not virtually identical, to a Mediterrenean Paleolithic diet. Walford's diet is essentially a Mediterrenean Paleolithic diet if you make the appropriate changes to eat only grass-fed meats, low-insulinic carbs and avoid refined oils. That begs the question: if our Paleolithic ancestors ate so fantastically healthy compared to modern diets, why didn't they live longer than 30-40 years of age? It's very unlikely they were eating a lot of excess calories in a warm, temperate climate, or eating past the point of satiety. So surely at least just one [skeleton] managed to defy the negative odds of widespread infections and infant mortality, the two reasons for our dramatic increase in the average lifespan last century. Logan > I always thought that our ideas about Omega 3's came from recent scientific > info, not from what we surmise about our ancestors . What our ancestors ate > isn't a scientific way to go about planning a modern diet and doesn't always > jibe with the healthiest way to eat from what we now know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.