Guest guest Posted September 2, 2004 Report Share Posted September 2, 2004 Hi JW: I have been fascinated for a while with your calculations for weight loss, such as those in your post below. But I do not understand them. Would it be possible to explain a bit more, or provide a link so that I can understand it better? It is the part about 6 oz. of water per 100 kcal of glucose (and similar calculations for the other macronutrients?) that I find interesting. One particular detail I am confused about is that you seem to say that a deficit of 100 kcal per day for ten days amounts to 3.3 #. I assume your " # " means pounds? I have seen other sources suggest 3500 kcal per pound. Using the 3500 number: 10 days x 100 kcal/day = 1000 kcal / 3500 kcal/pound = 0.286 pounds. That is a lot different from 3.3, so what am I missing here? TIA. Rodney. --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> wrote: > I eat usually 350 kcals for breakfast, the major meal about 1PM and > snack at supper. If I work outdoors, I estimate 100 kcals per > hour, or 300 kcals per hour walking. And I add that to my H-B > calculated requirement. So if I'm short 100 kcals I will lose a > little weight, and I calculate that by estimating that 1/3 is fat > and 2/3 is glucose. For the 2/3 glucose I lose 6 oz of water per > 100 kcals, or 4 oz in this case. 4 oz plus 1 oz carbo plus 1/3 fat > = 5 1/3 oz weight. Notice that's 3.3 # for 10 days - much too > fast, so I have to control to less than 100 kcals deficit per > day. ................ My goal was to burn fat, not make more > muscle. I can do that remarkably well now after experimenting for > several years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.