Guest guest Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 I started using HCG for weight loss in June of 2007. I went to a bariatric clinic in Tulsa and they did a complete physical with blood work to ensure that I was healthy prior to giving me the shots. I lost weight and did several rounds with the HCG shots from June of 2007 until June of 2008. I did not feel well during this time, but I attributed it to an especially hectic and demanding time at work as well as personally. My 72-year-old uncle had heart surgery and came to live with me for a few months while he recovered his strength and I caught a respiratory bug that would just NOT go away for a couple of months. So, I just thought that I felt sick and tired because I was sick and tired. When I had my next annual physical, they discovered that I had chronic myeloid leukemia. My hematologist/oncologist was very concerned that the HCG might have been the trigger that turned on the defective gene that causes this disease, and asked that I never take HCG shots again. I stopped immediately and I will NEVER use them again. It is simply not worth the risk. The problem of HCG and cancer is not just about leukemia. HCG masks cancer cells so that the body does not recognize them as foreign invaders that should be destroyed. So, while a person is taking HCG, the defense system can't identify and attack the cloaked cancer cells. Tumor cells actually secrete HCG to protect themselves from the immune system, and there is currently cancer research being done on using vaccines that would block the body's production of HCG. So, think long and hard before you start playing around with HCG. Even though the risk is probably very small on a percentage basis, if you are the one who develops cancer, it's 100% for you. Therefore, I believe that every client should be made aware that there is a risk of cloaking cancer cells if you use HCG in any form. -- _.:*¨¨*:._ Jeri Callan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Why are we using hormones for people who still have the relevant secreting glands and tissues, when we have a huge tool bag of botanical medicines that we have been using safely for millenia? In the field of integrative Oncology, from both a clinical, as well as a research based perspective, there is no question that giving people hormones increases their relative risk of developing cancer. Furthermore, as we all know, the enzymatic transformations of hormones are reversible reactions, and many diseases stem from faulty enzymatic pathways. The field of hormone research, involving hormones, hormone receptors, and the infinitely complex web of hormone signaling throughout the endocrine and neuroendocrine systems is poorly understood at best. Without possesing the tools necessary to understand the relevant enzymatic pathways as defined by genomics, proteo-genomics, and the current condition of an individual's hormone signaling system. Dr. Small Los Angeles, CAMake your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Excellent post! May I add that high gauss stationary magnets have been used quite successfully to balance the various indocrine glands. A fascinating book by Dr. Jules s titled 'Endogenous Endocrinotherapy' describes his treatment methods using high frequency diathermy on the endocrine glands rather than using hormone substances. He stated that he believed that Von Recklinghousen (neurofibromatosis)disease could be cured using only diathermy. His license was pulled before he could treat a patient with the disorder. A brillaint man for sure when one reads his book and certainly not a quack. > > Why are we using hormones for people who still have the relevant secreting > glands and tissues, when we have a huge tool bag of botanical medicines that we > have been using safely for millenia? In the field of integrative Oncology, > from both a clinical, as well as a research based perspective, there is no > question that giving people hormones increases their relative risk of developing > cancer. Furthermore, as we all know, the enzymatic transformations SNIP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 After reading all these posts I guess we could include HGH to the list of possible detriments? Kim Phelps On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:25 AM, comdyne2002 <comdyne@...> wrote: Excellent post! May I add that high gauss stationary magnets have been used quite successfully to balance the various indocrine glands. A fascinating book by Dr. Jules s titled 'Endogenous Endocrinotherapy' describes his treatment methods using high frequency diathermy on the endocrine glands rather than using hormone substances. He stated that he believed that Von Recklinghousen (neurofibromatosis)disease could be cured using only diathermy. His license was pulled before he could treat a patient with the disorder. A brillaint man for sure when one reads his book and certainly not a quack. >> Why are we using hormones for people who still have the relevant secreting > glands and tissues, when we have a huge tool bag of botanical medicines that we > have been using safely for millenia? In the field of integrative Oncology, > from both a clinical, as well as a research based perspective, there is no > question that giving people hormones increases their relative risk of developing > cancer. Furthermore, as we all know, the enzymatic transformations SNIP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Hi, Yes I agree here with Dr Small ¡V I don¡¦t have experience with taking hormones, but my observation about hormone technology and research is I don¡¦t think its reliable.. I don¡¦t think it can accurately be measured because hormones fluctuate constantly due to stress ¡V so better to just keep working with the epfx programs for stress reduction and general balancing, etc¡K I have had several people with female and hormone issues, including myself ƒº, where the epfx has magically helped to calm and dissipate these issues into nothing.¡K its all energy¡K And so also regarding the post about hormone balancing, I think you are the right track to Work with those epfx programs¡K And yes, otherwise lets stick with the natural safe herbs and botanical medicines ¡K ¡K they are more gentle to the system, feels right¡K As for this diathermy, I don¡¦t know but I just looked it up on the internet and it said it dealt with more of an electrical current¡K I would have to try it and see how it works, but jolting currents make me nervous also, or to use regularly.. I really like the epfx because it¡¦s more of a subtle frequency, and not jolting to the system, dealing with a subtle frequency as opposed to a current... So personally I find it to feel safer and more natural, something we can use regularly, etc... And I also think if we are creative with it and find the right frequencies to zap, etc, it can help us with all of these things, maybe more than we know, etc.. ƒº thanks, Maggie -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology - http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 If you haven't read Dr. Simeons' work, I suggest that you do. And, the homeopathic form (combination homeopathic form with various potencies in the remedy by Mediral, distributed by White Dove Healing) of HCG along with a few other rebuilder homeopathics is safe, the body knows how and what to do with this energy. If it doesn't need or want this frequency, it won't work with it (like biofeedback) - the body is intelligent to decipher...... just my opinion. Stimulating the body to recognize extra adipose tissue, toxins seems to me as helpful ..... and the endocrine gland rebuilders support this most important system. I think this is another option as are herbs, etc............ And, emfs are not endocrine friendly, so getting good emfs(radiation) protection is an important consideration with all dis-ease.Priscilla GrantFrom: comdyne2002 <comdyne@...>Subject: Re: HCG and Cancerqxci-scio-epfx-english Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 9:25 AM Excellent post! May I add that high gauss stationary magnets have been used quite successfully to balance the various indocrine glands. A fascinating book by Dr. Jules s titled 'Endogenous Endocrinotherapy' describes his treatment methods using high frequency diathermy on the endocrine glands rather than using hormone substances. He stated that he believed that Von Recklinghousen (neurofibromatosis) disease could be cured using only diathermy. His license was pulled before he could treat a patient with the disorder. A brillaint man for sure when one reads his book and certainly not a quack. > > Why are we using hormones for people who still have the relevant secreting > glands and tissues, when we have a huge tool bag of botanical medicines that we > have been using safely for millenia? In the field of integrative Oncology, > from both a clinical, as well as a research based perspective, there is no > question that giving people hormones increases their relative risk of developing > cancer. Furthermore, as we all know, the enzymatic transformations SNIP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.