Guest guest Posted May 14, 2004 Report Share Posted May 14, 2004 THE MS SOCIETY DISAPPOINTS ME. WHY DON'T THEY TALK TO PEOPLE THAT LDN HAS HELPED. I TOO HAVE MADE DONATIONS WHEN LOVED ONES HAVE DIED AND WISH YOU TO CONTRIBUTE TO A CHARITY. DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN'T TELL MS TO SEND YOUR $ FOR RESEARCH? TROUBLING EH? IF I'M WRONG PLEASE LET ME KNOW. MY MOM SENT MONEY AND WANTED IT TO GO TO RESEARCH AND THEY SAID THEY COULDN'T DO THAT. WONDER WHY??? KIM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2004 Report Share Posted May 14, 2004 I am an Engineer (Civil and Environmental – Rutgers Univ.), I have MS and I take LDN. Shame on the MS Society for the close minded and selfish reporting of old news and bad science. There are serious questions about the actual demyelinization mechanisms blamed for MS (the article dated April 24th in your news letter a prime example), the validity of using the induced " version " of MS in mice and the article cited from 1994 notes Naloxone and not Naltrexone (with no mention of the critical component dose – hence LOW DOSE Naltrexone). As a test engineer I can state with some degree of confidence that clinical testing is neither perfect nor conclusive. It is merely one of the best indicators we have. It is only as good as the parameters initially defined, and the " interpretation " of results which are presented as " conclusions " . The human factor clearly can skew any testing including Clinical Double Blind either intentionally or inadvertently. Anecdotal evidence, although not scientific in nature, certainly carries some validity as the number of anecdotal claims increase. At the very least it is the responsibility of the MS Society to fund immediate clinical trials rather than publishing weak and woefully inadequate speculations about something that, for whatever reason, is helping so many with MS. In addition, is seems apparent that the MS Society, by criticizing rather than investigating LDN, CHOOSES to know little about it. Again - Shame on you! Since being diagnosed several months back a number of donations have been made on my behalf, both in my name and anonymously (several substantial). I would like to know how to initiate the process of having those funds refunded. Although the Society clearly does some excellent work, it also seems clear something other than the health and well being of MSers creeps into the decision making process, and prioritization of expenditures, of donated funds. My money can be spent more efficiently elsewhere! Sincerely and with much disappointment, Alan (Please respond by return Email) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2004 Report Share Posted May 14, 2004 Well stated Alan, Sure wish my mind still worked as well as yours does!! Hope your eloquent words don't fall on deaf ears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.