Guest guest Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Dear , I am responding to the comments that you made, especially #9, I cut out 1-8 as they do not apply to my response at this time. to review the speciifc comments see below and belwo them my response: " 8. I do not wish I had studied more. However, if I had studied more, I would have reviewed drug names. 9. The study group did help me. I read the emails as well as reviewed the practice exams available. I got 2 more answers correct due to the information I learned in this group. I might have used the study group more, but I found the site difficult to navigate and the necessary information difficult to find. 10. I believe the study group would benefit more as a conventional web page with the information far more organized. However, I do realize you're maintaining this study group with your free time, Jeanetta. I don't expect you to have the time to implement any of this, especially since you run this site for free! 11. I used two books to study. The Pharmacy Technician from Perspective Press was a better book than Pharmacy Practice for Technicians by Durgin and Hanan. However, both books were not very good. I only got 1 additional answer right due to the information I learned from both books! However, I only read the sections with pharmacy law and pharmacology. I skipped or glanced through the remainder of the books. I'm happy to provide feedback, Jeanetta. If you have any other questions let me know! Liu " " , again I thank you for your valuable comments and insight. I take it very seriously when someone points out any problem withthe site or my material. Since I can not afford to maintain a web site or shall I say I really do not know how to make one.... the next best thing is to immitate one. So I took a HARD and HONEST look at the site and the same problem that existed about 2 years ago existed again. So much information to study but it was not 100% organized into sections. So I made NEW sections to use and then I did someting new which was to NUMBER them in th eorder one may need to read them to learn about the site, what th e site can do for one, the reason to study and the way to study and then study content. After that folders for AFTER becoming a tech, networking, associations, CE, career pathway and resume building. PLEASE review what Ihave done in the files section to see if it would indeed have made a difference and if it is better than before. Within the folders I attempted to reorganize again, placidn ALL that pertains to drugs and pharmacology into the pharmacology Folder, etc. There were apparently 2 such folders before. I have had to do this from time to time. Having LESS material in the first opening section is much better I believe and not so difficult to navigate or find material. Please kindly give your HONEST opinion. What do you think I should condense still, or again? Any other suggestions? Thank you again in advance, Respectfully, Jeanetta Mastron CPhT BS Pharmacy Technician Educator Founder/Ownwer of this site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.