Guest guest Posted February 19, 2011 Report Share Posted February 19, 2011 Do you have to go to a pharmacy tech school in order to become a pharm tech? Do you have to work under a pharmacist in order to become registered? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2011 Report Share Posted February 19, 2011 Dear , You do not have to go to pharm tech school IF your state does not require it. However that being said, would you like your medications filled by someone who has learned in a classroom setting AND performed MOCK labs in class AND who had a LIVE on the JOB externship under the direction of a pharmacist to put into practice what they have learned in school OR would you like someone who has only read a book to fill your prescriptions? If your state does not require formal education, and IF you can afford to go to school I highly recommend it. There are several online programs that are like/similar to reading and studying from a good book, and others that have an interactive component to them which increases comprehension and aids learning. These online programs range from $100 to $1500. I personally recommend if you are not going to go to school, that you go to my Files section,read my study guide book recommendations. Pick two books, purchase new/used or check out from a library and use this FREE site to study. Also make your own free interactive trade/generic flash cards and q/a on www.studystack.com [lock your stacks so that others can not add to them, which could make errors. Know that other stacks may have errors, study other stacks at your own risk/check out each slide/card carefully for errors.] States differ whether or not you must train under the direction of a pharmacist for a specific number of hours or not. Schools will also vary in the number of hours for an externship. Schools also vary whether or not they will find you an externship site or if you have to find one. You will need to know your state's laws and regulations regardng pharmacy technician. Hope this helps, Respectfully, Jeanetta Mastron CPhT BS Pharm Tech Educator Founder/Owner > > Do you have to go to a pharmacy tech school in order to become a pharm tech? Do you have to work under a pharmacist in order to become registered? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Jeanetta, While I understand and respect your point-of-view, I have to say it depends on the person and the situation. I did not have any schooling and I find that my co-workers that have had schooling (or are in school now) know less then what I know. Sincerely, ________________________________ From: Jeanetta Mastron <rxjm2002@...> Sent: Sat, February 19, 2011 6:34:23 PM Subject: Re: Pharm Tech School?  Dear , You do not have to go to pharm tech school IF your state does not require it. However that being said, would you like your medications filled by someone who has learned in a classroom setting AND performed MOCK labs in class AND who had a LIVE on the JOB externship under the direction of a pharmacist to put into practice what they have learned in school OR would you like someone who has only read a book to fill your prescriptions? If your state does not require formal education, and IF you can afford to go to school I highly recommend it. There are several online programs that are like/similar to reading and studying from a good book, and others that have an interactive component to them which increases comprehension and aids learning. These online programs range from $100 to $1500. I personally recommend if you are not going to go to school, that you go to my Files section,read my study guide book recommendations. Pick two books, purchase new/used or check out from a library and use this FREE site to study. Also make your own free interactive trade/generic flash cards and q/a on www.studystack.com [lock your stacks so that others can not add to them, which could make errors. Know that other stacks may have errors, study other stacks at your own risk/check out each slide/card carefully for errors.] States differ whether or not you must train under the direction of a pharmacist for a specific number of hours or not. Schools will also vary in the number of hours for an externship. Schools also vary whether or not they will find you an externship site or if you have to find one. You will need to know your state's laws and regulations regardng pharmacy technician. Hope this helps, Respectfully, Jeanetta Mastron CPhT BS Pharm Tech Educator Founder/Owner > > Do you have to go to a pharmacy tech school in order to become a pharm tech? >Do you have to work under a pharmacist in order to become registered? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Dear Eika and All, I respect your opinion as well. I suspect no matter what I write your opinion will not be swayed, as it is YOUR experience which can not be denied. I have debated this topic before on other sites over the years. I am a bit rusty on debate as I hung it up a while back. That being said, I will write a bit of how I argue this point to the government in trying to enact laws to require pharm techs to go to school. This is a sensitive area of discussion. There are MANY techs who are practicing who came up through the ranks who did not attend school. They are fine and efficient techs! They had to learn on the job and for the most part it took much longer for them to learn the basics of pharmacy and pharmacology compared to how and what I learned in school. When I began my externship, what I learned in school could not compare to what the techs with 5, 10 or 20 years experience new or were exposed to on the job. Yet their lack of pharmacology blinded many of them to med errors that I was able to discern. Of course the beginning stage of the schooled tech being trained or externed vs the experienced stage of the on the job tech is not tantamount. It is an unfair comparison. Apples and pineapples if you will. Now I am schooled with 20+ years of experience I have been able to compare my knowledge (not talking about abilities) with those of on the " job trained only/not schooled " techs with 20 years of experience. In most cases, I am able to discuss mechanism of action, duplication of therapy, adverse reactions, pharmcogenomics, pharmacokinetics etc with much greater ability and detail than my non-schooled counter parts. Comparitively when I was wet behind the ears, the same techs ran rings around me. They knew so much I thought and they did. More like they were able to do so much more, rather than knew so much more . My statements in my previous post are broad in that if one were to hire someone off the street and train them compared to hiring and training one who has successfully completed a pharm tech program from a school that is accredited, that the tech with the schooling would know more and be easier to train. However, BOTH need training! One cannot expect either to come to a job and know it all or to be able to do it all. YEARS of experience cannot compare to a 1 yr program, nor can a person who graduated from a one year program compare to someone with out any pharmacy background or knowledge at all. That would be the same for ANY vocation or profession (dentist with 5 days experience vs a dentist with 5 yrs or 10 yrs experience). Everyone needs a start. But a pharmacist or technician does not have to hire someone who does not have any information or background of pharmacy at all, when one can hire someone who has completed such a program. I would put my graduates up against ANY one coming in off the street ANY DAY. Is that a fair match? I think not! Neither is comparing a person who graduated from a program with an experience tech (such as yourself) when it comes to abilities of dispensing. But at some point, there is a leveling off of basic information learned on the job versus what one learns in a classroom and the experienced gained putting that into practice. It is at this point it much depends upon the person. In this event you are right! If we compare a person who is trained on the job for about 2 months and one coming out of school the " abilities " to fill a perscription, count out drugs and label etc would most likely be the same. However the person being trained on the job would lack pharmacology and the ability to recognize drug duplications and drug interactions. They may not be as quick to recognize a medication error. There should be much similarity, at 6 months of on the job training for BOTH the person off the street versus 6 months of on the job training of a person who completed a tech program with an externship with the hope that the person with the certificate of completion is still a bit better at recognizing drug duplication of therapy and drug interactions with the gap closing up quickly. One thing that has not been discussed is this: Interruptions and Distractions! It is the number one factor in drug error sited by pharmacists who have to train techs from off the street and is the number one reason why pharmacists have thrown in the towel to start externing techs from schools with the hope of hiring one who has completed a program as they are not as difficult to train since there are less interruptions of Trade/generics, what is an enema, suppository, suspension, basic operations etc By the time one completes a program he or she should know what she/he can and can not say to a patient, what a package insert is and that all hormones especially BCP should have them. What a BPM is and why we call them and need them etc. One does not have to stop and explain and if one does it is mainly to solidify what one has learned on the job. Most grads are scared to death the first day to week on an externship coupled with excitement. This does not mean that they do not have the knowledge or do not understand. They are in 'aw' of the experienced tech who training them. Also it is important to note that the schools and the states donot consider the education and training process complete until the externship is completed. So I am not sure if you were comparing your knowledge to one who completed the program with the externship or without an externship being completed. You might want to read an excerpt form Medication Errors By Cohen, American Pharmacists Association : http://books.google.com/books?id=Gpj7ZaptUDcC & pg=PA33 & lpg=PA33 & dq=distractions+t\ o+pharmacists & source=bl & ots=i2ozFrsK-h & sig=8ORSqRoqdPW7-rtoh9j73Ne3-Ss & hl=en & ei=\ 9TNjTfDYLI6osQOA_Oy-CA & sa=X & oi=book_result & ct=result & resnum=3 & sqi=2 & ved=0CCIQ6AE\ wAg - v=o] If that site does not work try Googeling distractions to pharmacists which yielded: Medication errors by Cohen American Pharmacists Association 2007 680 pages in which he sites two video cameras recorded the pharmacists' and technicians' work environment, and the tape was reviewed to count interruptions and distractions. Guess what they found? Most of the interuptions were caused by employees (techs) asking questions that they should have known the answer to or did not. The most frequent types of distraction were by co-workers (techs asking questions about prescriptions and procedures. And guess what else? As the number of distractions rose the number of medications also rose. In another study 45% of ALL errors were caused by interruptions and distractions. Interruptions and Distractions: Distractions account for 45 percent of medication errors. (YES almost HALF!) The suggested solutions include areas with minimized distractions, the use of visual cues (i.e. safety vests) and staff education and awareness. Notice STAFF education! Guess what they were NOT studying externs! But I am sure trainees were involved since they are employees! Another reason NOT to higher off the street, but rather one who has completed an externship and is somewhat trained rather than one who is not trained at all.. At one Laguna Honda Hospital (another Pebble Project) designed their pharmacy with the goal of improving several outcomes: reducing staff distractions and interruptions, improving operational workflow and efficiency, and increasing staff morale, recruitment and retention. The facility is currently under construction, and the design features of the new space to achieve their hypothesized outcomes include: Interruptions and Distractions: Distract-ions account for 45 percent of medication errors. The suggested solutions include areas with minimized distractions, the use of visual cues (i.e. safety vests) and staff education and awareness. sound noise lighting etc were also discussed. Part of the conclusion is: " We cannot change the human condition but we can change the conditions under which humans work " (Reason, 2000). Evidence-based design offers the opportunity to draw upon the latest credible research to positively impact safety, the work environment, and the patient experience, not just in hospitals and ambulatory care clinics, but in pharmacies, as well. The previous study was in l992 http://www.ajhp.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/13/1319 where as this study is published JPSW May/June 2010 http://www.healthdesign.org/sites/default/files/news/CreatingSaferandMoreEfficie\ ntPharmaciesthroughEBD.pdf In other data not on this site, after knowing this many pharmacists switched to externing and hiring externs, than hiring off the street. This was done on ambulatory care pharmacists where the distractions for rx reading and procedures are higher. Comparing a person off the street to a person who completed a tech program is comparing an apple to an orange. Comparing the trainability of a person off the street to another person off the street IS comparing oranges to oranges, you can say it depends upon the person. Here you would be absolutely right! Now when comparing one extern to another extern that is definitely apple to apple we will see diversity regarding implementing what one has learned in the real world. You as one who trains them will also see that. You may hear a pharmacist or tech say compared to the last extern we had this extern picks up quickly. You must be comparing student at the SAME time in their program same number of hours and courses completed. And it would be wise to compare same school to same school since there is no standard for the education of pharm techs (which is something that I am many other educators are working on). Comparing DAY I of a tech who completed a tech program to one who is being trained on DAY who is 'off the street' and it is like comparing an orange to an apple. Not until weeks or months have passed with training has been saturated and completed can we compare the two. And even then we would hope that the formally educated one has more pharmceutical knowledge with tasks and duties and abilities being equal. " know less then what I know. " So are you saying knowledge on day one? Compared to you an experienced tech? Then of course that is true. As that would not be a fair comparison either. But if you are comparing a graduate from a tech program on day one with a person off the street then that is not a fair comparison. BUT the public has no clue that is what is being done! They have no clue that the one person has to be trained 100% from scratch. Well I am if I have not been able to convey my true point of view without causing any hurt feelings, I truly have no other way of stating it. I want to defend education, but not all education is equal either. My students for example must do a poster session only after they have done many drug report presentations and taken a grueling pharmacolgy class with me. I have had numerous pharmacists see these poster sessions and posters and wonder why my students are being taught pharmacology at this level and I have had so many more pharmacists happy to hear of this because they feel my students catch more med errors than students from other schools (their experience with my techs and evidence based). So while I agree people are not created equal and much depends upon the person, much also depends upon the program/curriculum,, teacher and school. Likewise MUCH depends upon WHAT and WHO and WHEN we are COMPARING abilities and/or knowledge of a 'pharmacy tech' or " pharmacy student " . Still betting on training grads/externs over training people off the street. Still respecting your point of view. Respectfully, Jeanetta Mastron CPhT BS Founder/Owner Pharm Tech Educator > > > > Do you have to go to a pharmacy tech school in order to become a pharm tech? > >Do you have to work under a pharmacist in order to become registered? > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.