Guest guest Posted August 3, 2004 Report Share Posted August 3, 2004 Hi Reg, The substance that they use to fill the root canal is very toxic. In addition, it is unlikely that they will completely eradicate any infection that might have occurred. If either of these seep into the bloodstream.....and they do, there is trouble. My first two root canals were done when I was 16 ( 1958 ). My first ms symptoms started 2 yrs . later. I did not know what it was for years. My second six root canals were done in 1983. My ms was diagnosed in 1984. My cousin was horrified about the root canals at that time. She told me not to have them but I did not listen. Now, 20 yrs later , I am looking into having them removed. No small coincidence that Biomark also strongly advises removal before going any further. You ask a very provocative question.....what if removing the root canals is enough? Looks like a possible $20,000. savings. Regards, Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: Reg Kreil low dose naltrexone Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:17 PM Subject: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals Tom Why do you suppose that your root canals are being questioned? I suppose that you have also heard, like all of us, that there have been cases of spontaneous remission after removal of fillings and root canal cleanups.Basically a detoxing of your system is needed. So how many others have had to get "detoxed" before S.C.T.? And if that is so important maybe that is all I need do? It would sure be more cost effective than twenty thou. for a few hours of treatment! Reg. ____________________________________________________ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2004 Report Share Posted August 3, 2004 Very Very true and also (just cause it hits close to home) my brother who has had M.S. almost in perfect sync with me is way worse off than me but also I never had a root canal only lots of fillings, and extractions. And him of course with a dental plan got the root canals fillings and a bridge. Now could that be the reason he is so worse off????????? It is intriguing! Reg. -------Original Message------- From: low dose naltrexone Date: 08/03/04 12:04:02 low dose naltrexone Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals Hi Reg, The substance that they use to fill the root canal is very toxic. In addition, it is unlikely that they will completely eradicate any infection that might have occurred. If either of these seep into the bloodstream.....and they do, there is trouble. Now, 20 yrs later , I am looking into having them removed. No small coincidence that Biomark also strongly advises removal before going any further. You ask a very provocative question.....what if removing the root canals is enough? Looks like a possible $20,000. savings. Regards, Tom ----- Original Message ----- after root canals ____________________________________________________ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 It sure could be the reason. Regards, Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: Reg Kreil low dose naltrexone Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals Very Very true and also (just cause it hits close to home) my brother who has had M.S. almost in perfect sync with me is way worse off than me but also I never had a root canal only lots of fillings, and extractions. And him of course with a dental plan got the root canals fillings and a bridge. Now could that be the reason he is so worse off????????? It is intriguing! Reg. -------Original Message------- From: low dose naltrexone Date: 08/03/04 12:04:02 low dose naltrexone Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals Hi Reg, The substance that they use to fill the root canal is very toxic. In addition, it is unlikely that they will completely eradicate any infection that might have occurred. If either of these seep into the bloodstream.....and they do, there is trouble. Now, 20 yrs later , I am looking into having them removed. No small coincidence that Biomark also strongly advises removal before going any further. You ask a very provocative question.....what if removing the root canals is enough? Looks like a possible $20,000. savings. Regards, Tom ----- Original Message ----- after root canals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.