Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: SCT after root canals

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Reg,

The substance that they use to fill the root canal is very toxic. In addition, it is unlikely that they will completely eradicate any infection that might have occurred. If either of these seep into the bloodstream.....and they do, there is trouble.

My first two root canals were done when I was 16 ( 1958 ). My first ms symptoms started 2 yrs . later. I did not know what it was for years. My second six root canals were done in 1983. My ms was diagnosed in 1984. My cousin was horrified about the root canals at that time. She told me not to have them but I did not listen.

Now, 20 yrs later , I am looking into having them removed. No small coincidence that Biomark also strongly advises removal before going any further. You ask a very provocative question.....what if removing the root canals is enough? Looks like a possible $20,000. savings.

Regards,

Tom

----- Original Message -----

From: Reg Kreil

low dose naltrexone

Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:17 PM

Subject: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals

Tom

Why do you suppose that your root canals are being questioned?

I suppose that you have also heard, like all of us, that there have been cases of spontaneous remission after removal of fillings and root canal cleanups.Basically a detoxing of your system is needed.

So how many others have had to get "detoxed" before S.C.T.?

And if that is so important maybe that is all I need do?

It would sure be more cost effective than twenty thou. for a few hours of treatment!

Reg.

____________________________________________________ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Very Very true and also (just cause it hits close to home) my brother who has had M.S. almost in perfect sync with me is way worse off than me but also I never had a root canal only lots of fillings, and extractions. And him of course with a dental plan got the root canals fillings and a bridge.

Now could that be the reason he is so worse off?????????

It is intriguing!

Reg.

-------Original Message-------

From: low dose naltrexone

Date: 08/03/04 12:04:02

low dose naltrexone

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals

Hi Reg,

The substance that they use to fill the root canal is very toxic. In addition, it is unlikely that they will completely eradicate any infection that might have occurred. If either of these seep into the bloodstream.....and they do, there is trouble.

Now, 20 yrs later , I am looking into having them removed. No small coincidence that Biomark also strongly advises removal before going any further. You ask a very provocative question.....what if removing the root canals is enough? Looks like a possible $20,000. savings.

Regards,

Tom

----- Original Message -----

after root canals

____________________________________________________ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It sure could be the reason.

Regards,

Tom

----- Original Message -----

From: Reg Kreil

low dose naltrexone

Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 5:45 PM

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals

Very Very true and also (just cause it hits close to home) my brother who has had M.S. almost in perfect sync with me is way worse off than me but also I never had a root canal only lots of fillings, and extractions. And him of course with a dental plan got the root canals fillings and a bridge.

Now could that be the reason he is so worse off?????????

It is intriguing!

Reg.

-------Original Message-------

From: low dose naltrexone

Date: 08/03/04 12:04:02

low dose naltrexone

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: SCT after root canals

Hi Reg,

The substance that they use to fill the root canal is very toxic. In addition, it is unlikely that they will completely eradicate any infection that might have occurred. If either of these seep into the bloodstream.....and they do, there is trouble.

Now, 20 yrs later , I am looking into having them removed. No small coincidence that Biomark also strongly advises removal before going any further. You ask a very provocative question.....what if removing the root canals is enough? Looks like a possible $20,000. savings.

Regards,

Tom

----- Original Message -----

after root canals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...