Guest guest Posted January 15, 2000 Report Share Posted January 15, 2000 yes, http://www.whale.to, Dr. At 10:15 PM 01/14/2000 -0800, you wrote: >Has anyone used any enzymes for cancer or lukeamia ? >Thanks >Randa > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >For the fastest and easiest way to backup your files and, access them from >anywhere. Try @backup Free for 30 days. Click here for a chance to win a >digital camera. >1/337/5/_/378/_/947916925/ > >-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar! >-- cal?listname=cures for cancer & m=1 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2000 Report Share Posted January 15, 2000 Im working with an unusual person who has guided me onto WobenzymeN, available in US. Similar product is polyzyme, from a company in NJ and available from large natural drug stores. Also Im using Wobemugus, only available from Germany, as suppository and orally, I can give more details if asked and when it is not so late. Webster wrote: yes, http://www.whale.to, Dr. At 10:15 PM 01/14/2000 -0800, you wrote: >Has anyone used any enzymes for cancer or lukeamia ? >Thanks >Randa > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >For the fastest and easiest way to backup your files and, access them from >anywhere. Try @backup Free for 30 days. Click here for a chance to win a >digital camera. >1/337/5/_/378/_/947916925/ > >-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar! >-- cal?listname=cures for cancer & m=1 > > > Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe eGroups.com Home: cures for cancer www. - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2000 Report Share Posted January 15, 2000 How do I stop these e-mails from being sent? I am treating some cancer patients and it is clogging up my computer for very important messages Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2000 Report Share Posted January 18, 2000 I thought all messages were important.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2001 Report Share Posted April 20, 2001 In a message dated 04/20/2001 6:49:49 PM Central Daylight Time, ejohns9525@... writes: << o if the proper things with enzymes aren't there then the aging process is rapidly stepped up and illnesses start happening. It doesn't happen over night so by the time we are really sick we wondered what has gone wrong. Then the road back to health is...not pleasant. I wish I had known all of the things I just told you years ago. My health would be better and I would not have gone thru so much illness. If you are a young person, do not quander your good health. >> ......No, Edith, I am not young, I am 46. I too wish I had known what I am now learning, but I must confess I am not doing totally raw foods. I am trying to juice and add more live foods than I ever used to eat before and I am greatly minimizing white flour. The sugar is another story, so I don't know if any of the positive things I am doing really count with sugar in the picture. I have reduced the sugar intake, but still consume way too much. I try to stay aware and to learn more every day about what I SHOULD be doing, hoping a little more motivation will wear off on me!!! Well, the motivation is there, but the temptation is just a little bit bigger. Then there is the issue of non-organic - I can't afford those kinds of foods, so I just buy my produce from the grocery store. To hear some people, I might as well be living on potato chips and candy bars, but surely there is SOME benefit from regular grocery store produce. (?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2001 Report Share Posted April 21, 2001 In a message dated 04/20/2001 8:16:32 PM Central Daylight Time, str8barber@... writes: << .No, Edith, I am not young, I am 46. I too wish I had known what I am now learning, but I must confess I am not doing totally raw foods. I am trying to juice and add more live foods than I ever used to eat before and I am greatly minimizing white flour. <<snip>> Then there is the issue of non-organic - I can't afford those kinds of foods, so I just buy my produce from the grocery store. To hear some people, I might as well be living on potato chips and candy bars, but surely there is SOME benefit from regular grocery store produce. (?) >> _____________________________________________ , When I was very sick a few yrs back, I juiced and took mega barley green. At frist I didn't understand the organic issue so used carrots and apples I bought bulk from a produce place. I was too sick to eat so other food was not a problem. The Lord rewards faith so I was getting better gradually but when I dicovered organic carrots, there was a great difference in my health. I still buy organic only now and then......I can't afford it full time either. My friend that sells it is about 40 miles from me and the closest and only place around. I live in east Tx and there's just not a market for it here. But I have been gardening so I can have my own cheap!! And I do take lots of the greenfoods still to keep me going. Just keep moving toward your goal....no sugar. Edith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2001 Report Share Posted May 19, 2001 There are many kinds of enzyme therapies, but you are probably most interested in . An account of his therapy can be fouind at : http://www.healthy.net/asp/templates/article.asp?PageType=article & ID=2012 [ ] Enzyme therapy Hi! I'm new in the group. Does anyone here have personal experience with enzyme therapy? I am researching this for a frien who has had ovarian cancer for three years and done fairly well with chemo and radiation. http://home.online.no/~dusan/diseases/cancer/ http://home.online.no/~dusan/diseases/cancer/faq.htm http://www.geocities.com/~mycleanse/ http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158 You are receiving this email because you elected to subscribe to the egroups. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2001 Report Share Posted May 20, 2001 > There are many kinds of enzyme therapies, but you are probably most > interested in . An account of his therapy can be fouind at : > http://www.healthy.net/asp/templates/article.asp? Thanks , This article is very interesting. I will forward it to my friend. I have also found some research on micro-algae I will be reviewing. In particular there is recent research to indicate that AFA ( Aphanizomeon flos-aqua ) algae stimulates the NK cells at this site: http://www.celltech.com/BetterNutrition/link1.asp Also, I just got a collection of research in the mail that may have more specifics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 is not allowed to treat cancer patients who have not already completed two types of traditional therapies i.e. surgery, chemo or radiation. I know, I applied to be his patient. Enzyme Therapy Hi, if I had cancer I would contact Dr . source: http://www.navi.net/~rsc/cancer/beard-b.txt >From A.J. Lanigan's book: Health in a Pill and Other Medical Myths To contact author write: A.J.Lanigan P.O. Box 6337 Columbia S.C. 29260 URL: http://www.clynx.com/AJ/ajsbook.html GONZALEZ VERIFIES KELLY PROGRAM Dr. , who practices in New York City, is using an innovative nutritional protocol to successfully treat far advanced cancer patients. As a classically trained immunologist, he approached this therapy with a great deal of skepti cism but became convinced of its value during an exhaustive five year research project. In July of 1981, during the summer preceding his third year at Cornell University Medical College, Dr. embarked upon an informal evaluation of a nutritional approach to cancer. A friend had asked him to look into a dentist named in Texas who had reportedly cured a patient of terminal cancer. What started as a way to spend a summer vacation eventually developed into a five year research project under the direction of the former President of Sloan Kettering Institute, Dr. Good. On his trip to Texas, was astonished to find case after case, if appropriately diagnosed, of advanced metastatic cancer patients who were healthy and active 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis. had made available all of his records, we ll over 10,000 patients, and encouraged to contact any and all of them. returned to New York to ask for advise from Dr. Good whom he had befriended when Good was President of Sloan Kettering and was a first year medical student. Good eventually served as faculty advisor as the study evolved and extended to an independent research project during senior year. Though subsequently moving to the University of Oklahoma, Good continued under special arrangements as sponsor and guide. When Good became Chief of Pediatrics at All Children's Hospital at the University of South Florida, joined him to complete the project. Many of the patients under this study were examined by both and Good. Dr. Good had suggested that as an initial goal, fifty terminal cancer patients be identified who had done well on s nutritional protocol. The patients were to have been diagnosed by the appropriate specialist so that there could be no doubt about the diagnosis of cancer. An initial review of all records between 1970 and 1982 yielded 1,306 patients. Contacting these patients by mail produced over 1000 potential candidates for the study. At this point, lengthy phone interviews were begun, essentially starting at the to p of the list and concluding until enough patients (455) had been obtained to ensure that at least 50 that would meet Dr. Good s strict inclusion criteria. Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of whom had terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of study. Eventually the group of 455 was reduced to 160 that fit Dr. Good s inclusion criteria. For each of these cases, complete medical records were obtained. Follow-up was extensive, including examination of patients, interviews, with family and physicians , etc.. From these 160 cases, 50 representative cases were chosen and presented in a 300 page manuscript detailing the study. Another 200+ pages, copies of medical records, were included in this yet to be published document. The fifty patients represented 25 different types of cancer. There were 28 males and 22 females, ages 21-77 at the start of therapy and 33-83 at the time of the study. Patients were included from 24 states, and occupations varied widely. Twenty five of these patients were diagnosed at two or more medical centers. Twenty three were diagnosed at major institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, M.D. , etc. Forty eight cases provided biopsy confirmation of cancer, the other t wo upon exploratory surgery, were found to have large inoperable tumors where the attending surgeon thought that the diagnosis was obvious and did not want to risk biopsy surgery. Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of which had terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of the study. As extraordinary as these results were, Dr. Good thought a further step was required. He wanted a numerator/denominator study. Dr. was to pick one type of cancer, identify every patient seeing Kelley with this diagnosis and follow up on all patients to establish a response rate. chose pancreatic cancer, since the 5 year survival rate in orthodox medicine is virtually 0%. All patients consulting Kelley between 1974 and 1982 were reviewed to produce 22 who had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The 22 broke down into three groups. Ten patients consulted Kelley only once and never went on the protocol. All had died. Seven patients followed the protocol only partially and sporadically, as determined by interview with family members, physicians, and records obtained from the manufacturer/distributor of the special nutritional supplements. These patients had all died. Five patients followed the protocol completely and achieved long-term remission, although one had died (of Alzheimers) after 11.5 years survival. The median survival of the three groups was as follows: 1. Never follow (10) = 67 days 2. Followed partially (7) = 233 days 3. Followed completely (5) = 9 years At this point, Dr. Good and Dr. realized that even though Kelley s results were extraordinary, in fact unparalleled in medicine, they were of little use in the treatment of cancer unless they could be independently reproduced. This is the stage of the research at present. Over the past years, Dr. has been using the protocol with a few modifications of his own in the treatment of terminal cancer. TOTAL COST OF THE PROGRAM IS ABOUT $5,000 TO $6,000 PER YEAR. Dr. keeps careful records on his patients; and with no longer practicing, he is monitoring many of s patients after 10 years or more. He is finding that about 80% of the people are doing well on his therapy. Most of his patients have been heavily pretreated by orthodox means (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) and, have failed these, have come to him with a prognosis of two or three months to live. One of the attractive points of his therapy is the cost. After about 2 years a maintenance program is used at a further reduced cost. Supplements constitute about 70% to 80% of the cost. There is generally no hospital cost involved. This is perhaps only 10% of the cost one might expect to pay as a terminally ill cancer patient. At the conclusion of his manuscript, Dr. stated that his hope was to have this particular nutritional therapy evaluated further under controlled clinical conditions in an academic setting. This has not happened. The approach is so unorthodox that although a number of doctors in academic medicine now refer patients to Dr. , no one is stepping forward to fund a clinical trial. The protocol, briefly described, consists of six basic components: 1. Appropriate diet - there are 10 basic diets with 94 variations ranging from strict vegetarian to red meat depending on the cancer and the patient. 2. Intensive nutritional support - depending on each patient's deficiencies, vitamins, minerals, trace elements, electrolytes, and amino acids are described. 3. Protomorphgen support - these are concentrates in pill form, of raw beef organs and glands. 4. Digestive aids - e.g., pepsin, hydrochloric acid, etc. 5. Pancreatic enzyme therapy - proteolytic pancreatic enzymes are taken orally to attack and liquefy tumors. 6. Detoxification - among the many regimens used is the coffee enema. The purpose is to help the body eliminate the unnatural abundance of toxins and waste products as tumors break down in the body. [........ see beard-a.txt ......] NCI Sponsors Clinical Trial to Evaluate Program The National Cancer Institute will evaluate alternative methods that have met the " best-case-series standards " (Contact McCabe, RN, a clinical trials specialist for NCI at 301-496-5583 for questions). The Kelley Program, developed by Kelley, DDS was used to heal his own pancreatic cancer in 1967. In a 17 year period, over 10,000 seriously ill patients were treated with this program. Many were terminally ill cancer patients, some still surviving as of this date. , MD, who conducted an exhaustive 5 year study of Kelley's program, will conduct an initial 10 case pancreatic cancer trial. This is the subject of the NCI's interest. Dr. is presently practicing his version of the Kelley method in New York. The phone number I have for him is 212-213-3337. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 is not allowed to treat cancer patients who have not already completed two types of traditional therapies i.e. surgery, chemo or radiation. I know, I applied to be his patient. Enzyme Therapy Hi, if I had cancer I would contact Dr . source: http://www.navi.net/~rsc/cancer/beard-b.txt >From A.J. Lanigan's book: Health in a Pill and Other Medical Myths To contact author write: A.J.Lanigan P.O. Box 6337 Columbia S.C. 29260 URL: http://www.clynx.com/AJ/ajsbook.html GONZALEZ VERIFIES KELLY PROGRAM Dr. , who practices in New York City, is using an innovative nutritional protocol to successfully treat far advanced cancer patients. As a classically trained immunologist, he approached this therapy with a great deal of skepti cism but became convinced of its value during an exhaustive five year research project. In July of 1981, during the summer preceding his third year at Cornell University Medical College, Dr. embarked upon an informal evaluation of a nutritional approach to cancer. A friend had asked him to look into a dentist named in Texas who had reportedly cured a patient of terminal cancer. What started as a way to spend a summer vacation eventually developed into a five year research project under the direction of the former President of Sloan Kettering Institute, Dr. Good. On his trip to Texas, was astonished to find case after case, if appropriately diagnosed, of advanced metastatic cancer patients who were healthy and active 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis. had made available all of his records, we ll over 10,000 patients, and encouraged to contact any and all of them. returned to New York to ask for advise from Dr. Good whom he had befriended when Good was President of Sloan Kettering and was a first year medical student. Good eventually served as faculty advisor as the study evolved and extended to an independent research project during senior year. Though subsequently moving to the University of Oklahoma, Good continued under special arrangements as sponsor and guide. When Good became Chief of Pediatrics at All Children's Hospital at the University of South Florida, joined him to complete the project. Many of the patients under this study were examined by both and Good. Dr. Good had suggested that as an initial goal, fifty terminal cancer patients be identified who had done well on s nutritional protocol. The patients were to have been diagnosed by the appropriate specialist so that there could be no doubt about the diagnosis of cancer. An initial review of all records between 1970 and 1982 yielded 1,306 patients. Contacting these patients by mail produced over 1000 potential candidates for the study. At this point, lengthy phone interviews were begun, essentially starting at the to p of the list and concluding until enough patients (455) had been obtained to ensure that at least 50 that would meet Dr. Good s strict inclusion criteria. Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of whom had terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of study. Eventually the group of 455 was reduced to 160 that fit Dr. Good s inclusion criteria. For each of these cases, complete medical records were obtained. Follow-up was extensive, including examination of patients, interviews, with family and physicians , etc.. From these 160 cases, 50 representative cases were chosen and presented in a 300 page manuscript detailing the study. Another 200+ pages, copies of medical records, were included in this yet to be published document. The fifty patients represented 25 different types of cancer. There were 28 males and 22 females, ages 21-77 at the start of therapy and 33-83 at the time of the study. Patients were included from 24 states, and occupations varied widely. Twenty five of these patients were diagnosed at two or more medical centers. Twenty three were diagnosed at major institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, M.D. , etc. Forty eight cases provided biopsy confirmation of cancer, the other t wo upon exploratory surgery, were found to have large inoperable tumors where the attending surgeon thought that the diagnosis was obvious and did not want to risk biopsy surgery. Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of which had terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of the study. As extraordinary as these results were, Dr. Good thought a further step was required. He wanted a numerator/denominator study. Dr. was to pick one type of cancer, identify every patient seeing Kelley with this diagnosis and follow up on all patients to establish a response rate. chose pancreatic cancer, since the 5 year survival rate in orthodox medicine is virtually 0%. All patients consulting Kelley between 1974 and 1982 were reviewed to produce 22 who had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The 22 broke down into three groups. Ten patients consulted Kelley only once and never went on the protocol. All had died. Seven patients followed the protocol only partially and sporadically, as determined by interview with family members, physicians, and records obtained from the manufacturer/distributor of the special nutritional supplements. These patients had all died. Five patients followed the protocol completely and achieved long-term remission, although one had died (of Alzheimers) after 11.5 years survival. The median survival of the three groups was as follows: 1. Never follow (10) = 67 days 2. Followed partially (7) = 233 days 3. Followed completely (5) = 9 years At this point, Dr. Good and Dr. realized that even though Kelley s results were extraordinary, in fact unparalleled in medicine, they were of little use in the treatment of cancer unless they could be independently reproduced. This is the stage of the research at present. Over the past years, Dr. has been using the protocol with a few modifications of his own in the treatment of terminal cancer. TOTAL COST OF THE PROGRAM IS ABOUT $5,000 TO $6,000 PER YEAR. Dr. keeps careful records on his patients; and with no longer practicing, he is monitoring many of s patients after 10 years or more. He is finding that about 80% of the people are doing well on his therapy. Most of his patients have been heavily pretreated by orthodox means (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) and, have failed these, have come to him with a prognosis of two or three months to live. One of the attractive points of his therapy is the cost. After about 2 years a maintenance program is used at a further reduced cost. Supplements constitute about 70% to 80% of the cost. There is generally no hospital cost involved. This is perhaps only 10% of the cost one might expect to pay as a terminally ill cancer patient. At the conclusion of his manuscript, Dr. stated that his hope was to have this particular nutritional therapy evaluated further under controlled clinical conditions in an academic setting. This has not happened. The approach is so unorthodox that although a number of doctors in academic medicine now refer patients to Dr. , no one is stepping forward to fund a clinical trial. The protocol, briefly described, consists of six basic components: 1. Appropriate diet - there are 10 basic diets with 94 variations ranging from strict vegetarian to red meat depending on the cancer and the patient. 2. Intensive nutritional support - depending on each patient's deficiencies, vitamins, minerals, trace elements, electrolytes, and amino acids are described. 3. Protomorphgen support - these are concentrates in pill form, of raw beef organs and glands. 4. Digestive aids - e.g., pepsin, hydrochloric acid, etc. 5. Pancreatic enzyme therapy - proteolytic pancreatic enzymes are taken orally to attack and liquefy tumors. 6. Detoxification - among the many regimens used is the coffee enema. The purpose is to help the body eliminate the unnatural abundance of toxins and waste products as tumors break down in the body. [........ see beard-a.txt ......] NCI Sponsors Clinical Trial to Evaluate Program The National Cancer Institute will evaluate alternative methods that have met the " best-case-series standards " (Contact McCabe, RN, a clinical trials specialist for NCI at 301-496-5583 for questions). The Kelley Program, developed by Kelley, DDS was used to heal his own pancreatic cancer in 1967. In a 17 year period, over 10,000 seriously ill patients were treated with this program. Many were terminally ill cancer patients, some still surviving as of this date. , MD, who conducted an exhaustive 5 year study of Kelley's program, will conduct an initial 10 case pancreatic cancer trial. This is the subject of the NCI's interest. Dr. is presently practicing his version of the Kelley method in New York. The phone number I have for him is 212-213-3337. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 - I don't think that can be the case in all instances as he treated my father-in-law and insisted that he NOT have had any chemo or radiation. My FIL was one of the patients on the pilot program back in 1996 which resulted in NCI funding a full blown study of the protocol for treating pancreatic cancer. Peggy Groulx wrote: > is not allowed to treat cancer patients who have not already > > completed two types of traditional therapies i.e. surgery, chemo or > radiation. I know, I applied to be his patient. > > > > Enzyme Therapy > > > Hi, > if I had cancer I would contact Dr . > > source: > http://www.navi.net/~rsc/cancer/beard-b.txt > > >From A.J. Lanigan's book: Health in a Pill and Other Medical Myths > > To contact author write: > A.J.Lanigan > P.O. Box 6337 > Columbia S.C. 29260 > > URL: http://www.clynx.com/AJ/ajsbook.html > > > GONZALEZ VERIFIES KELLY PROGRAM > Dr. , who practices in New York City, is > using > an innovative nutritional protocol to successfully treat far advanced > cancer patients. As a classically trained immunologist, he approached > this > therapy with a great deal of skepti cism but became convinced of its > value > during an exhaustive five year research project. > In July of 1981, during the summer preceding his third year at > Cornell University Medical College, Dr. embarked upon an > informal > evaluation of a nutritional approach to cancer. A friend had asked him > to > look into a dentist named in Texas who had reportedly cured a > patient of terminal cancer. What started as a way to spend a summer > vacation eventually developed into a five year research project under > the > direction of the former President of Sloan Kettering Institute, Dr. > > Good. > On his trip to Texas, was astonished to find case after > case, if appropriately diagnosed, of advanced metastatic cancer > patients > who were healthy and active 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis. > had > made available all of his records, we ll over 10,000 patients, and > encouraged to contact any and all of them. > returned to New York to ask for advise from Dr. Good > whom he > had befriended when Good was President of Sloan Kettering and > was > a first year medical student. Good eventually served as faculty > advisor as > the study evolved and extended to an independent research project > during > senior year. Though subsequently moving to the University of > Oklahoma, Good continued under special arrangements as sponsor and > guide. > When Good became Chief of Pediatrics at All Children's Hospital at the > > University of South Florida, joined him to complete the > project. > Many of the patients under this study were examined by both > and > Good. > Dr. Good had suggested that as an initial goal, fifty terminal > cancer > patients be identified who had done well on s nutritional > protocol. > The patients were to have been diagnosed by the appropriate specialist > so > that there could be no doubt about the diagnosis of cancer. > An initial review of all records between 1970 and 1982 yielded > 1,306 > patients. Contacting these patients by mail produced over 1000 > potential > candidates for the study. At this point, lengthy phone interviews were > > begun, essentially starting at the to p of the list and concluding > until > enough patients (455) had been obtained to ensure that at least 50 > that > would meet Dr. Good s strict inclusion criteria. > Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of whom had > terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of > study. > Eventually the group of 455 was reduced to 160 that fit Dr. Good > s > inclusion criteria. For each of these cases, complete medical records > were > obtained. Follow-up was extensive, including examination of patients, > interviews, with family and physicians , etc.. From these 160 cases, > 50 > representative cases were chosen and presented in a 300 page > manuscript > detailing the study. Another 200+ pages, copies of medical records, > were > included in this yet to be published document. > The fifty patients represented 25 different types of cancer. > There > were 28 males and 22 females, ages 21-77 at the start of therapy and > 33-83 > at the time of the study. Patients were included from 24 states, and > occupations varied widely. Twenty five of these patients were > diagnosed at > two or more medical centers. Twenty three were diagnosed at major > institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, M.D. > , etc. Forty eight cases provided biopsy confirmation of > cancer, > the other t wo upon exploratory surgery, were found to have large > inoperable tumors where the attending surgeon thought that the > diagnosis > was obvious and did not want to risk biopsy surgery. Median survival > of > this group of 50 patients, all of which had terminal or extremely poor > > prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of the study. > As extraordinary as these results were, Dr. Good thought a > further > step was required. He wanted a numerator/denominator study. Dr. > > was to pick one type of cancer, identify every patient seeing Kelley > with > this diagnosis and follow up on all patients to establish a response > rate. > chose pancreatic cancer, since the 5 year survival rate > in > orthodox medicine is virtually 0%. All patients consulting Kelley > between > 1974 and 1982 were reviewed to produce 22 who had been diagnosed with > pancreatic cancer. The 22 broke down into three groups. Ten patients > consulted Kelley only once and never went on the protocol. All had > died. > Seven patients followed the protocol only partially and sporadically, > as > determined by interview with family members, physicians, and records > obtained from the manufacturer/distributor of the special nutritional > supplements. These patients had all died. Five patients followed the > protocol completely and achieved long-term remission, although one had > > died (of Alzheimers) after 11.5 years survival. > The median survival of the three groups was as follows: 1. Never > follow (10) = 67 days 2. Followed partially (7) = 233 days 3. Followed > > completely (5) = 9 years > At this point, Dr. Good and Dr. realized that even > though > Kelley s results were extraordinary, in fact unparalleled in medicine, > > they were of little use in the treatment of cancer unless they could > be > independently reproduced. This is the stage of the research at > present. > Over the past years, Dr. has been using the protocol > with a > few modifications of his own in the treatment of terminal cancer. > TOTAL > COST OF THE PROGRAM IS ABOUT $5,000 TO $6,000 PER YEAR. > Dr. keeps careful records on his patients; and with > no > longer practicing, he is monitoring many of s patients after 10 > years or more. He is finding that about 80% of the people are doing > well > on his therapy. Most of his patients have been heavily pretreated by > orthodox means (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) and, have failed > these, > have come to him with a prognosis of two or three months to live. > One of the attractive points of his therapy is the cost. After > about > 2 years a maintenance program is used at a further reduced cost. > Supplements constitute about 70% to 80% of the cost. There is > generally no > hospital cost involved. This is perhaps only 10% of the cost one might > > expect to pay as a terminally ill cancer patient. > At the conclusion of his manuscript, Dr. stated that his > > hope was to have this particular nutritional therapy evaluated further > > under controlled clinical conditions in an academic setting. This has > not > happened. The approach is so unorthodox that although a number of > doctors > in academic medicine now refer patients to Dr. , no one is > stepping forward to fund a clinical trial. The protocol, briefly > described, consists of six basic components: 1. Appropriate diet - > there > are 10 basic diets with 94 variations ranging from strict vegetarian > to > red meat depending on the cancer and the patient. 2. Intensive > nutritional support - depending on each patient's deficiencies, > vitamins, > minerals, trace elements, electrolytes, and amino acids are described. > 3. > Protomorphgen support - these are concentrates in pill form, of raw > beef > organs and glands. 4. Digestive aids - e.g., pepsin, hydrochloric > acid, > etc. 5. Pancreatic enzyme therapy - proteolytic pancreatic enzymes are > > taken orally to attack and liquefy tumors. 6. Detoxification - among > the > many regimens used is the coffee enema. The purpose is to help the > body > eliminate the unnatural abundance of toxins and waste products as > tumors > break down in the body. > > [........ see beard-a.txt ......] > > NCI Sponsors Clinical Trial to Evaluate Program > > The National Cancer Institute will evaluate alternative methods > that > have met the " best-case-series standards " (Contact McCabe, RN, a > clinical trials specialist for NCI at 301-496-5583 for questions). > The > Kelley Program, developed by Kelley, DDS was used to > heal > his own pancreatic cancer in 1967. In a 17 year period, over 10,000 > seriously ill patients were treated with this program. Many were > terminally ill cancer patients, some still surviving as of this date. > , MD, who conducted an exhaustive 5 year study of > Kelley's program, will conduct an initial 10 case pancreatic cancer > trial. > This is the subject of the NCI's interest. Dr. is presently > practicing his version of the Kelley method in New York. The phone > number I have for him is 212-213-3337. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 - I don't think that can be the case in all instances as he treated my father-in-law and insisted that he NOT have had any chemo or radiation. My FIL was one of the patients on the pilot program back in 1996 which resulted in NCI funding a full blown study of the protocol for treating pancreatic cancer. Peggy Groulx wrote: > is not allowed to treat cancer patients who have not already > > completed two types of traditional therapies i.e. surgery, chemo or > radiation. I know, I applied to be his patient. > > > > Enzyme Therapy > > > Hi, > if I had cancer I would contact Dr . > > source: > http://www.navi.net/~rsc/cancer/beard-b.txt > > >From A.J. Lanigan's book: Health in a Pill and Other Medical Myths > > To contact author write: > A.J.Lanigan > P.O. Box 6337 > Columbia S.C. 29260 > > URL: http://www.clynx.com/AJ/ajsbook.html > > > GONZALEZ VERIFIES KELLY PROGRAM > Dr. , who practices in New York City, is > using > an innovative nutritional protocol to successfully treat far advanced > cancer patients. As a classically trained immunologist, he approached > this > therapy with a great deal of skepti cism but became convinced of its > value > during an exhaustive five year research project. > In July of 1981, during the summer preceding his third year at > Cornell University Medical College, Dr. embarked upon an > informal > evaluation of a nutritional approach to cancer. A friend had asked him > to > look into a dentist named in Texas who had reportedly cured a > patient of terminal cancer. What started as a way to spend a summer > vacation eventually developed into a five year research project under > the > direction of the former President of Sloan Kettering Institute, Dr. > > Good. > On his trip to Texas, was astonished to find case after > case, if appropriately diagnosed, of advanced metastatic cancer > patients > who were healthy and active 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis. > had > made available all of his records, we ll over 10,000 patients, and > encouraged to contact any and all of them. > returned to New York to ask for advise from Dr. Good > whom he > had befriended when Good was President of Sloan Kettering and > was > a first year medical student. Good eventually served as faculty > advisor as > the study evolved and extended to an independent research project > during > senior year. Though subsequently moving to the University of > Oklahoma, Good continued under special arrangements as sponsor and > guide. > When Good became Chief of Pediatrics at All Children's Hospital at the > > University of South Florida, joined him to complete the > project. > Many of the patients under this study were examined by both > and > Good. > Dr. Good had suggested that as an initial goal, fifty terminal > cancer > patients be identified who had done well on s nutritional > protocol. > The patients were to have been diagnosed by the appropriate specialist > so > that there could be no doubt about the diagnosis of cancer. > An initial review of all records between 1970 and 1982 yielded > 1,306 > patients. Contacting these patients by mail produced over 1000 > potential > candidates for the study. At this point, lengthy phone interviews were > > begun, essentially starting at the to p of the list and concluding > until > enough patients (455) had been obtained to ensure that at least 50 > that > would meet Dr. Good s strict inclusion criteria. > Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of whom had > terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of > study. > Eventually the group of 455 was reduced to 160 that fit Dr. Good > s > inclusion criteria. For each of these cases, complete medical records > were > obtained. Follow-up was extensive, including examination of patients, > interviews, with family and physicians , etc.. From these 160 cases, > 50 > representative cases were chosen and presented in a 300 page > manuscript > detailing the study. Another 200+ pages, copies of medical records, > were > included in this yet to be published document. > The fifty patients represented 25 different types of cancer. > There > were 28 males and 22 females, ages 21-77 at the start of therapy and > 33-83 > at the time of the study. Patients were included from 24 states, and > occupations varied widely. Twenty five of these patients were > diagnosed at > two or more medical centers. Twenty three were diagnosed at major > institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, M.D. > , etc. Forty eight cases provided biopsy confirmation of > cancer, > the other t wo upon exploratory surgery, were found to have large > inoperable tumors where the attending surgeon thought that the > diagnosis > was obvious and did not want to risk biopsy surgery. Median survival > of > this group of 50 patients, all of which had terminal or extremely poor > > prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of the study. > As extraordinary as these results were, Dr. Good thought a > further > step was required. He wanted a numerator/denominator study. Dr. > > was to pick one type of cancer, identify every patient seeing Kelley > with > this diagnosis and follow up on all patients to establish a response > rate. > chose pancreatic cancer, since the 5 year survival rate > in > orthodox medicine is virtually 0%. All patients consulting Kelley > between > 1974 and 1982 were reviewed to produce 22 who had been diagnosed with > pancreatic cancer. The 22 broke down into three groups. Ten patients > consulted Kelley only once and never went on the protocol. All had > died. > Seven patients followed the protocol only partially and sporadically, > as > determined by interview with family members, physicians, and records > obtained from the manufacturer/distributor of the special nutritional > supplements. These patients had all died. Five patients followed the > protocol completely and achieved long-term remission, although one had > > died (of Alzheimers) after 11.5 years survival. > The median survival of the three groups was as follows: 1. Never > follow (10) = 67 days 2. Followed partially (7) = 233 days 3. Followed > > completely (5) = 9 years > At this point, Dr. Good and Dr. realized that even > though > Kelley s results were extraordinary, in fact unparalleled in medicine, > > they were of little use in the treatment of cancer unless they could > be > independently reproduced. This is the stage of the research at > present. > Over the past years, Dr. has been using the protocol > with a > few modifications of his own in the treatment of terminal cancer. > TOTAL > COST OF THE PROGRAM IS ABOUT $5,000 TO $6,000 PER YEAR. > Dr. keeps careful records on his patients; and with > no > longer practicing, he is monitoring many of s patients after 10 > years or more. He is finding that about 80% of the people are doing > well > on his therapy. Most of his patients have been heavily pretreated by > orthodox means (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) and, have failed > these, > have come to him with a prognosis of two or three months to live. > One of the attractive points of his therapy is the cost. After > about > 2 years a maintenance program is used at a further reduced cost. > Supplements constitute about 70% to 80% of the cost. There is > generally no > hospital cost involved. This is perhaps only 10% of the cost one might > > expect to pay as a terminally ill cancer patient. > At the conclusion of his manuscript, Dr. stated that his > > hope was to have this particular nutritional therapy evaluated further > > under controlled clinical conditions in an academic setting. This has > not > happened. The approach is so unorthodox that although a number of > doctors > in academic medicine now refer patients to Dr. , no one is > stepping forward to fund a clinical trial. The protocol, briefly > described, consists of six basic components: 1. Appropriate diet - > there > are 10 basic diets with 94 variations ranging from strict vegetarian > to > red meat depending on the cancer and the patient. 2. Intensive > nutritional support - depending on each patient's deficiencies, > vitamins, > minerals, trace elements, electrolytes, and amino acids are described. > 3. > Protomorphgen support - these are concentrates in pill form, of raw > beef > organs and glands. 4. Digestive aids - e.g., pepsin, hydrochloric > acid, > etc. 5. Pancreatic enzyme therapy - proteolytic pancreatic enzymes are > > taken orally to attack and liquefy tumors. 6. Detoxification - among > the > many regimens used is the coffee enema. The purpose is to help the > body > eliminate the unnatural abundance of toxins and waste products as > tumors > break down in the body. > > [........ see beard-a.txt ......] > > NCI Sponsors Clinical Trial to Evaluate Program > > The National Cancer Institute will evaluate alternative methods > that > have met the " best-case-series standards " (Contact McCabe, RN, a > clinical trials specialist for NCI at 301-496-5583 for questions). > The > Kelley Program, developed by Kelley, DDS was used to > heal > his own pancreatic cancer in 1967. In a 17 year period, over 10,000 > seriously ill patients were treated with this program. Many were > terminally ill cancer patients, some still surviving as of this date. > , MD, who conducted an exhaustive 5 year study of > Kelley's program, will conduct an initial 10 case pancreatic cancer > trial. > This is the subject of the NCI's interest. Dr. is presently > practicing his version of the Kelley method in New York. The phone > number I have for him is 212-213-3337. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 Peggy..my mistake, he may have been allowed to make exceptions for pancreatic cancer patients. Enzyme Therapy > > > Hi, > if I had cancer I would contact Dr . > > source: > http://www.navi.net/~rsc/cancer/beard-b.txt > > >From A.J. Lanigan's book: Health in a Pill and Other Medical Myths > > To contact author write: > A.J.Lanigan > P.O. Box 6337 > Columbia S.C. 29260 > > URL: http://www.clynx.com/AJ/ajsbook.html > > > GONZALEZ VERIFIES KELLY PROGRAM > Dr. , who practices in New York City, is > using > an innovative nutritional protocol to successfully treat far advanced > cancer patients. As a classically trained immunologist, he approached > this > therapy with a great deal of skepti cism but became convinced of its > value > during an exhaustive five year research project. > In July of 1981, during the summer preceding his third year at > Cornell University Medical College, Dr. embarked upon an > informal > evaluation of a nutritional approach to cancer. A friend had asked him > to > look into a dentist named in Texas who had reportedly cured a > patient of terminal cancer. What started as a way to spend a summer > vacation eventually developed into a five year research project under > the > direction of the former President of Sloan Kettering Institute, Dr. > > Good. > On his trip to Texas, was astonished to find case after > case, if appropriately diagnosed, of advanced metastatic cancer > patients > who were healthy and active 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis. > had > made available all of his records, we ll over 10,000 patients, and > encouraged to contact any and all of them. > returned to New York to ask for advise from Dr. Good > whom he > had befriended when Good was President of Sloan Kettering and > was > a first year medical student. Good eventually served as faculty > advisor as > the study evolved and extended to an independent research project > during > senior year. Though subsequently moving to the University of > Oklahoma, Good continued under special arrangements as sponsor and > guide. > When Good became Chief of Pediatrics at All Children's Hospital at the > > University of South Florida, joined him to complete the > project. > Many of the patients under this study were examined by both > and > Good. > Dr. Good had suggested that as an initial goal, fifty terminal > cancer > patients be identified who had done well on s nutritional > protocol. > The patients were to have been diagnosed by the appropriate specialist > so > that there could be no doubt about the diagnosis of cancer. > An initial review of all records between 1970 and 1982 yielded > 1,306 > patients. Contacting these patients by mail produced over 1000 > potential > candidates for the study. At this point, lengthy phone interviews were > > begun, essentially starting at the to p of the list and concluding > until > enough patients (455) had been obtained to ensure that at least 50 > that > would meet Dr. Good s strict inclusion criteria. > Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of whom had > terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of > study. > Eventually the group of 455 was reduced to 160 that fit Dr. Good > s > inclusion criteria. For each of these cases, complete medical records > were > obtained. Follow-up was extensive, including examination of patients, > interviews, with family and physicians , etc.. From these 160 cases, > 50 > representative cases were chosen and presented in a 300 page > manuscript > detailing the study. Another 200+ pages, copies of medical records, > were > included in this yet to be published document. > The fifty patients represented 25 different types of cancer. > There > were 28 males and 22 females, ages 21-77 at the start of therapy and > 33-83 > at the time of the study. Patients were included from 24 states, and > occupations varied widely. Twenty five of these patients were > diagnosed at > two or more medical centers. Twenty three were diagnosed at major > institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, M.D. > , etc. Forty eight cases provided biopsy confirmation of > cancer, > the other t wo upon exploratory surgery, were found to have large > inoperable tumors where the attending surgeon thought that the > diagnosis > was obvious and did not want to risk biopsy surgery. Median survival > of > this group of 50 patients, all of which had terminal or extremely poor > > prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of the study. > As extraordinary as these results were, Dr. Good thought a > further > step was required. He wanted a numerator/denominator study. Dr. > > was to pick one type of cancer, identify every patient seeing Kelley > with > this diagnosis and follow up on all patients to establish a response > rate. > chose pancreatic cancer, since the 5 year survival rate > in > orthodox medicine is virtually 0%. All patients consulting Kelley > between > 1974 and 1982 were reviewed to produce 22 who had been diagnosed with > pancreatic cancer. The 22 broke down into three groups. Ten patients > consulted Kelley only once and never went on the protocol. All had > died. > Seven patients followed the protocol only partially and sporadically, > as > determined by interview with family members, physicians, and records > obtained from the manufacturer/distributor of the special nutritional > supplements. These patients had all died. Five patients followed the > protocol completely and achieved long-term remission, although one had > > died (of Alzheimers) after 11.5 years survival. > The median survival of the three groups was as follows: 1. Never > follow (10) = 67 days 2. Followed partially (7) = 233 days 3. Followed > > completely (5) = 9 years > At this point, Dr. Good and Dr. realized that even > though > Kelley s results were extraordinary, in fact unparalleled in medicine, > > they were of little use in the treatment of cancer unless they could > be > independently reproduced. This is the stage of the research at > present. > Over the past years, Dr. has been using the protocol > with a > few modifications of his own in the treatment of terminal cancer. > TOTAL > COST OF THE PROGRAM IS ABOUT $5,000 TO $6,000 PER YEAR. > Dr. keeps careful records on his patients; and with > no > longer practicing, he is monitoring many of s patients after 10 > years or more. He is finding that about 80% of the people are doing > well > on his therapy. Most of his patients have been heavily pretreated by > orthodox means (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) and, have failed > these, > have come to him with a prognosis of two or three months to live. > One of the attractive points of his therapy is the cost. After > about > 2 years a maintenance program is used at a further reduced cost. > Supplements constitute about 70% to 80% of the cost. There is > generally no > hospital cost involved. This is perhaps only 10% of the cost one might > > expect to pay as a terminally ill cancer patient. > At the conclusion of his manuscript, Dr. stated that his > > hope was to have this particular nutritional therapy evaluated further > > under controlled clinical conditions in an academic setting. This has > not > happened. The approach is so unorthodox that although a number of > doctors > in academic medicine now refer patients to Dr. , no one is > stepping forward to fund a clinical trial. The protocol, briefly > described, consists of six basic components: 1. Appropriate diet - > there > are 10 basic diets with 94 variations ranging from strict vegetarian > to > red meat depending on the cancer and the patient. 2. Intensive > nutritional support - depending on each patient's deficiencies, > vitamins, > minerals, trace elements, electrolytes, and amino acids are described. > 3. > Protomorphgen support - these are concentrates in pill form, of raw > beef > organs and glands. 4. Digestive aids - e.g., pepsin, hydrochloric > acid, > etc. 5. Pancreatic enzyme therapy - proteolytic pancreatic enzymes are > > taken orally to attack and liquefy tumors. 6. Detoxification - among > the > many regimens used is the coffee enema. The purpose is to help the > body > eliminate the unnatural abundance of toxins and waste products as > tumors > break down in the body. > > [........ see beard-a.txt ......] > > NCI Sponsors Clinical Trial to Evaluate Program > > The National Cancer Institute will evaluate alternative methods > that > have met the " best-case-series standards " (Contact McCabe, RN, a > clinical trials specialist for NCI at 301-496-5583 for questions). > The > Kelley Program, developed by Kelley, DDS was used to > heal > his own pancreatic cancer in 1967. In a 17 year period, over 10,000 > seriously ill patients were treated with this program. Many were > terminally ill cancer patients, some still surviving as of this date. > , MD, who conducted an exhaustive 5 year study of > Kelley's program, will conduct an initial 10 case pancreatic cancer > trial. > This is the subject of the NCI's interest. Dr. is presently > practicing his version of the Kelley method in New York. The phone > number I have for him is 212-213-3337. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 Peggy..my mistake, he may have been allowed to make exceptions for pancreatic cancer patients. Enzyme Therapy > > > Hi, > if I had cancer I would contact Dr . > > source: > http://www.navi.net/~rsc/cancer/beard-b.txt > > >From A.J. Lanigan's book: Health in a Pill and Other Medical Myths > > To contact author write: > A.J.Lanigan > P.O. Box 6337 > Columbia S.C. 29260 > > URL: http://www.clynx.com/AJ/ajsbook.html > > > GONZALEZ VERIFIES KELLY PROGRAM > Dr. , who practices in New York City, is > using > an innovative nutritional protocol to successfully treat far advanced > cancer patients. As a classically trained immunologist, he approached > this > therapy with a great deal of skepti cism but became convinced of its > value > during an exhaustive five year research project. > In July of 1981, during the summer preceding his third year at > Cornell University Medical College, Dr. embarked upon an > informal > evaluation of a nutritional approach to cancer. A friend had asked him > to > look into a dentist named in Texas who had reportedly cured a > patient of terminal cancer. What started as a way to spend a summer > vacation eventually developed into a five year research project under > the > direction of the former President of Sloan Kettering Institute, Dr. > > Good. > On his trip to Texas, was astonished to find case after > case, if appropriately diagnosed, of advanced metastatic cancer > patients > who were healthy and active 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis. > had > made available all of his records, we ll over 10,000 patients, and > encouraged to contact any and all of them. > returned to New York to ask for advise from Dr. Good > whom he > had befriended when Good was President of Sloan Kettering and > was > a first year medical student. Good eventually served as faculty > advisor as > the study evolved and extended to an independent research project > during > senior year. Though subsequently moving to the University of > Oklahoma, Good continued under special arrangements as sponsor and > guide. > When Good became Chief of Pediatrics at All Children's Hospital at the > > University of South Florida, joined him to complete the > project. > Many of the patients under this study were examined by both > and > Good. > Dr. Good had suggested that as an initial goal, fifty terminal > cancer > patients be identified who had done well on s nutritional > protocol. > The patients were to have been diagnosed by the appropriate specialist > so > that there could be no doubt about the diagnosis of cancer. > An initial review of all records between 1970 and 1982 yielded > 1,306 > patients. Contacting these patients by mail produced over 1000 > potential > candidates for the study. At this point, lengthy phone interviews were > > begun, essentially starting at the to p of the list and concluding > until > enough patients (455) had been obtained to ensure that at least 50 > that > would meet Dr. Good s strict inclusion criteria. > Median survival of this group of 50 patients, all of whom had > terminal or extremely poor prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of > study. > Eventually the group of 455 was reduced to 160 that fit Dr. Good > s > inclusion criteria. For each of these cases, complete medical records > were > obtained. Follow-up was extensive, including examination of patients, > interviews, with family and physicians , etc.. From these 160 cases, > 50 > representative cases were chosen and presented in a 300 page > manuscript > detailing the study. Another 200+ pages, copies of medical records, > were > included in this yet to be published document. > The fifty patients represented 25 different types of cancer. > There > were 28 males and 22 females, ages 21-77 at the start of therapy and > 33-83 > at the time of the study. Patients were included from 24 states, and > occupations varied widely. Twenty five of these patients were > diagnosed at > two or more medical centers. Twenty three were diagnosed at major > institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, M.D. > , etc. Forty eight cases provided biopsy confirmation of > cancer, > the other t wo upon exploratory surgery, were found to have large > inoperable tumors where the attending surgeon thought that the > diagnosis > was obvious and did not want to risk biopsy surgery. Median survival > of > this group of 50 patients, all of which had terminal or extremely poor > > prognosis, was 10 years as of the date of the study. > As extraordinary as these results were, Dr. Good thought a > further > step was required. He wanted a numerator/denominator study. Dr. > > was to pick one type of cancer, identify every patient seeing Kelley > with > this diagnosis and follow up on all patients to establish a response > rate. > chose pancreatic cancer, since the 5 year survival rate > in > orthodox medicine is virtually 0%. All patients consulting Kelley > between > 1974 and 1982 were reviewed to produce 22 who had been diagnosed with > pancreatic cancer. The 22 broke down into three groups. Ten patients > consulted Kelley only once and never went on the protocol. All had > died. > Seven patients followed the protocol only partially and sporadically, > as > determined by interview with family members, physicians, and records > obtained from the manufacturer/distributor of the special nutritional > supplements. These patients had all died. Five patients followed the > protocol completely and achieved long-term remission, although one had > > died (of Alzheimers) after 11.5 years survival. > The median survival of the three groups was as follows: 1. Never > follow (10) = 67 days 2. Followed partially (7) = 233 days 3. Followed > > completely (5) = 9 years > At this point, Dr. Good and Dr. realized that even > though > Kelley s results were extraordinary, in fact unparalleled in medicine, > > they were of little use in the treatment of cancer unless they could > be > independently reproduced. This is the stage of the research at > present. > Over the past years, Dr. has been using the protocol > with a > few modifications of his own in the treatment of terminal cancer. > TOTAL > COST OF THE PROGRAM IS ABOUT $5,000 TO $6,000 PER YEAR. > Dr. keeps careful records on his patients; and with > no > longer practicing, he is monitoring many of s patients after 10 > years or more. He is finding that about 80% of the people are doing > well > on his therapy. Most of his patients have been heavily pretreated by > orthodox means (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) and, have failed > these, > have come to him with a prognosis of two or three months to live. > One of the attractive points of his therapy is the cost. After > about > 2 years a maintenance program is used at a further reduced cost. > Supplements constitute about 70% to 80% of the cost. There is > generally no > hospital cost involved. This is perhaps only 10% of the cost one might > > expect to pay as a terminally ill cancer patient. > At the conclusion of his manuscript, Dr. stated that his > > hope was to have this particular nutritional therapy evaluated further > > under controlled clinical conditions in an academic setting. This has > not > happened. The approach is so unorthodox that although a number of > doctors > in academic medicine now refer patients to Dr. , no one is > stepping forward to fund a clinical trial. The protocol, briefly > described, consists of six basic components: 1. Appropriate diet - > there > are 10 basic diets with 94 variations ranging from strict vegetarian > to > red meat depending on the cancer and the patient. 2. Intensive > nutritional support - depending on each patient's deficiencies, > vitamins, > minerals, trace elements, electrolytes, and amino acids are described. > 3. > Protomorphgen support - these are concentrates in pill form, of raw > beef > organs and glands. 4. Digestive aids - e.g., pepsin, hydrochloric > acid, > etc. 5. Pancreatic enzyme therapy - proteolytic pancreatic enzymes are > > taken orally to attack and liquefy tumors. 6. Detoxification - among > the > many regimens used is the coffee enema. The purpose is to help the > body > eliminate the unnatural abundance of toxins and waste products as > tumors > break down in the body. > > [........ see beard-a.txt ......] > > NCI Sponsors Clinical Trial to Evaluate Program > > The National Cancer Institute will evaluate alternative methods > that > have met the " best-case-series standards " (Contact McCabe, RN, a > clinical trials specialist for NCI at 301-496-5583 for questions). > The > Kelley Program, developed by Kelley, DDS was used to > heal > his own pancreatic cancer in 1967. In a 17 year period, over 10,000 > seriously ill patients were treated with this program. Many were > terminally ill cancer patients, some still surviving as of this date. > , MD, who conducted an exhaustive 5 year study of > Kelley's program, will conduct an initial 10 case pancreatic cancer > trial. > This is the subject of the NCI's interest. Dr. is presently > practicing his version of the Kelley method in New York. The phone > number I have for him is 212-213-3337. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Hi, I'm currently researching enzyme therapy. Anyone tried it? I would really appreciate hearing about your experiences. There are some fascinating articles on enzyme therapy at www.radianthealth.cc Regards, Jan (Aust) --------------------------------- BT Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 Hi Jan, I tried this for lyme and got very good results. For protocols using various plant and animal enz. formulations, consider http://wwww.mucos.de (wobenzym); they also make other enzymatic formulations. I'd go w/ them first to maximaize chance of a good effect as they've been in the business w/ enzymes the longest that I know of. Try other products at a later time. While expensive, I'd go with them first to ensure I get the best chance of having an effect, then risk other companies. With some preps., I've not gotten the same effect. Ping > Hi, > > I'm currently researching enzyme therapy. Anyone tried it? I would really appreciate hearing about your experiences. > > There are some fascinating articles on enzyme therapy at > > www.radianthealth.cc > > Regards, > Jan (Aust) > > > > > --------------------------------- > BT Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Thank you-I will pass this info on- Eileen >From: " & Jack Rawlings " <jamaraw@...> >Reply- >< > >Subject: Re: enzyme therapy >Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:00:41 -0400 > >Hi Eilleen, > I have read that some people think that cancer is caused by a virus....if >that is true , it would make sense that enzymes would help to dissolve the >cell wall and allow the cancer cell to die-off.It is so easy to do that I >would definitely have her check with her oncologist to try it. > R > _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Hi Eilleen, I have read that some people think that cancer is caused by a virus....if that is true , it would make sense that enzymes would help to dissolve the cell wall and allow the cancer cell to die-off.It is so easy to do that I would definitely have her check with her oncologist to try it. R Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Has anyone tried the enzyme therapy for asthma? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 I know of no clinical evidence to support the treatment of asthma with enzyme therapy. I have found some indications that a few folks have found it useful as an adjunctive therapy in addition to normal pharmacological treatments and avoidance of asthma triggers. As an adjunctive therapy, it appears that enzyme therapy occasionally helps lesson symptoms of asthma, but does not prevent asthma. Enzyme therapy does not appear to be addressed for the treatment of allergy/asthma except in literature that discusses experimental treatments. At this time, it appears that enzyme therapy is more of an alternative treatment, although I could not find any discussion about its use in relationship to asthma on the website of the National Center of Complimentary and Alternative Medicine. I doubt that there is sufficient research on enzyme therapy for asthma to warrant seriously considering it as an option. My take on this is that if one is seeing a medical doctor who has been using enzyme therapy as an adjunctive therapy with some success, it might be worth a try. Otherwise, no. This is a reminder that this website supports discussions about Xolair as a treatment for allergies/allergic asthma. It is not generally open to discussions about questionable or alternative therapies. Addy Group co-owner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.