Re: Re:reactor meltdowns possibly worst predicted scenario

[Guest guest]

Thank you for speaking to this as I joined this group to talk about the

benefits of coconut and health, not political bashing. I was going to go in

today and remove my name from the list. I'll stick it out if it is going to stay

productive.

Lori

________________________________

From: Little Scout <andreakollo@...>

Coconut Oil

Sent: Sun, June 19, 2011 10:24:19 AM

Subject: Re:reactor meltdowns possibly " worst predicted

scenario "

Please tell me that this group isn't going to degenerate into a political

bashing place. Your comments are outrageous and inappropriate.

Surely the POTUS can't be responsible for this as well ... get a grip and stay

on topic.

Take your political agenda to the many facebook groups dedicated to bashing,

trashing and dehumanizing the president, this is no place for it.

The reality is that there are ministers in charge of this sort of thing and the

POTUS is not an expert on such things and relies on their questionable expert

advice.

Got a problem, take it to the people that advise him, congress and sentate.

Geesh!

>

> > Re: reactor meltdowns possibly " worst predicted scenario "

> > Posted by: " Bob Banever " bbanever@... moxaman2002

> > Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:28 pm (PDT)

> >

> >

> >

> > Some media outlets are. Huffington Post has been carrying some news on this

> > lately. What disturbes me the most is that our esteemed President has

> > ordered the USDA to STOP testing for radioactivity in our air, water, and

> > food claiming it's a waste of money and the amount of radioactivity is so

> > small. I thought it was the government's job to protect it's citizens more

> > than anything else... perhaps I was wrong. God help all of us.

> >

> > Bob

> > Re: Re: reactor meltdowns possibly " worst

> > predicted scenario "

> >

> > > Why is the media not saying anything at all about this??!! : (

> > >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

zalman,

If the Saudis are members of the Illuminati and allied with the

Rothschild family they I can agree with you, but understand that the CFR, an

offshoot of the Illuminati, are simply carrying out the orders of

international banking concerns owned and operated by the Rothschilds. They

are worth about $500 Trillion, and they wish to control the world with their

New World Order. It is this entity that is destroying the economies of

America and several other nations as they steal our money and subvert our

Constitution. They have bought the SCOTUS, congress, and the White House.

Bush was their mascot, and now Obama has fulfilled that role. Trillions

have been stolen from us as our country rapidly descends into third world

status.

Re: Re: reactor meltdowns possibly

>> " worst

>> predicted scenario "

>>

>> > Why is the media not saying anything at all about this??!! : (

>> >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I apologize to the group for my political rant. I will not do so again.

Re:reactor meltdowns possibly " worst

predicted scenario "

>

>

> --- well said may I add more

> KEEP THE POLITICS OUT OF THIS GROUP!!!!!!!!!!

> there I feel better now(smile)

>

> mike

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

[Guest guest]

THANK YOU! I hope everyone else follows suit.

wow.

On Jun 19, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Bob Banever wrote:

> I apologize to the group for my political rant. I will not do so again.

[Guest guest]

On 2011-06-19 10:58 AM, Dolores wrote:

> As for the meltdown - I hope we all learn from it. NO MORE NUCLEAR

> PLANTS - PERIOD!

> Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go.

Do you have any idea how naive this comment is?

Let me put it another way - do you have any idea how many thousands of

square miles of wind turbine farms (or solar farms) it would take to

replace the total electricity generated by just ONE nuclear power plant?

The solutions isn't to eliminate nuclear, the solution is to use SAFE

nuclear energy...

www.energyfromthorium.com

[Guest guest]

I think you are right.

From: Coconut Oil

[mailto:Coconut Oil ] On Behalf Of Bob Banever

Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 10:06 AM

Coconut Oil

Subject: Re: Re:reactor meltdowns possibly " worst

predicted scenario "

zalman,

If the Saudis are members of the Illuminati and allied with the

Rothschild family they I can agree with you, but understand that the CFR, an

offshoot of the Illuminati, are simply carrying out the orders of

international banking concerns owned and operated by the Rothschilds. They

are worth about $500 Trillion, and they wish to control the world with their

New World Order. It is this entity that is destroying the economies of

America and several other nations as they steal our money and subvert our

Constitution. They have bought the SCOTUS, congress, and the White House.

Bush was their mascot, and now Obama has fulfilled that role. Trillions

have been stolen from us as our country rapidly descends into third world

status.

Re: Re: reactor meltdowns possibly

>> " worst

>> predicted scenario "

>>

>> > Why is the media not saying anything at all about this??!! : (

>> >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Wouldn't it be a start to put solar panels on houses and other buildings?

In many areas people could at least produce enough solar energy to cover

their own power usage - I imagine that would cut the need for outside

sources of energy dramatically. We also have a number of businesses now

providing their own energy with solar panels.

> On 2011-06-19 10:58 AM, Dolores wrote:

> > As for the meltdown - I hope we all learn from it. NO MORE NUCLEAR

> > PLANTS - PERIOD!

> > Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go.

>

> Do you have any idea how naive this comment is?

>

> Let me put it another way - do you have any idea how many thousands of

> square miles of wind turbine farms (or solar farms) it would take to

> replace the total electricity generated by just ONE nuclear power plant?

>

> The solutions isn't to eliminate nuclear, the solution is to use SAFE

> nuclear energy...

>

> www.energyfromthorium.com

>

>

[Guest guest]

Sad part of it is, our kids don't believe any of this. So many won't, until

it is too late. : (

Judy

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:08 PM, llje <llje@...> wrote:

> **

>

>

> I think you are right.

>

> From: Coconut Oil

> [mailto:Coconut Oil ] On Behalf Of Bob Banever

> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 10:06 AM

> Coconut Oil

> Subject: Re: Re:reactor meltdowns possibly " worst

> predicted scenario "

>

> zalman,

>

> If the Saudis are members of the Illuminati and allied with the

> Rothschild family they I can agree with you, but understand that the CFR,

> an

>

> offshoot of the Illuminati, are simply carrying out the orders of

> international banking concerns owned and operated by the Rothschilds. They

> are worth about $500 Trillion, and they wish to control the world with

> their

>

> New World Order. It is this entity that is destroying the economies of

> America and several other nations as they steal our money and subvert our

> Constitution. They have bought the SCOTUS, congress, and the White House.

> Bush was their mascot, and now Obama has fulfilled that role. Trillions

> have been stolen from us as our country rapidly descends into third world

> status.

> Re: Re: reactor meltdowns possibly

> >> " worst

> >> predicted scenario "

> >>

> >> > Why is the media not saying anything at all about this??!! : (

> >> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Sadly, solar and/or wind power won't work everywhere. It also would not pay

for itself for many, many years; we could build smaller, safer nuclear

plants for energy.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Cochrane <juliemc9@...> wrote:

> Wouldn't it be a start to put solar panels on houses and other buildings?

> In many areas people could at least produce enough solar energy to cover

> their own power usage - I imagine that would cut the need for outside

> sources of energy dramatically. We also have a number of businesses now

> providing their own energy with solar panels.

>

>

>

> > On 2011-06-19 10:58 AM, Dolores wrote:

> > > As for the meltdown - I hope we all learn from it. NO MORE NUCLEAR

> > > PLANTS - PERIOD!

> > > Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go.

> >

> > Do you have any idea how naive this comment is?

> >

> > Let me put it another way - do you have any idea how many thousands of

> > square miles of wind turbine farms (or solar farms) it would take to

> > replace the total electricity generated by just ONE nuclear power plant?

> >

> > The solutions isn't to eliminate nuclear, the solution is to use SAFE

> > nuclear energy...

> >

> > www.energyfromthorium.com

> >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I don't think it's so much about paying for itself as the safety issue.

Solar power used to cost quite a bit here in Australia but it's very cheap

at the moment and a whole house system would pay for itself in about five

years. Much of the world does receive enough solar power to cover their

own power so that would go a very long way to reducing the demand on power

from other sources, and perhaps wind power could contribute to some of the

rest.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:20 PM, J Trettel <gnp222@...> wrote:

> **

>

>

> Sadly, solar and/or wind power won't work everywhere. It also would not pay

> for itself for many, many years; we could build smaller, safer nuclear

> plants for energy.

>

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Cochrane <juliemc9@...>

> wrote:

>

> > Wouldn't it be a start to put solar panels on houses and other buildings?

> > In many areas people could at least produce enough solar energy to cover

> > their own power usage - I imagine that would cut the need for outside

> > sources of energy dramatically. We also have a number of businesses now

> > providing their own energy with solar panels.

> >

> >

> >

> > > On 2011-06-19 10:58 AM, Dolores wrote:

> > > > As for the meltdown - I hope we all learn from it. NO MORE NUCLEAR

> > > > PLANTS - PERIOD!

> > > > Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go.

> > >

> > > Do you have any idea how naive this comment is?

> > >

> > > Let me put it another way - do you have any idea how many thousands of

> > > square miles of wind turbine farms (or solar farms) it would take to

> > > replace the total electricity generated by just ONE nuclear power

> plant?

> > >

> > > The solutions isn't to eliminate nuclear, the solution is to use SAFE

> > > nuclear energy...

> > >

> > > www.energyfromthorium.com

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

On 2011-06-20 3:15 PM, Cochrane wrote:

> Wouldn't it be a start to put solar panels on houses and other

> buildings? In many areas people could at least produce enough solar

> energy to cover their own power usage

In most areas and in most cases, these *might* be able to provide 2-5%

of the energy needs of the building in question...

Residential is a little better because they generally have lower energy

requirements than commercial buildings, but you still need a bunch of

expensive equipment (batteries, inverters, and a backup generator to

fill in the gaps, which there will be a lot of, etc) if you want 100%

reliable energy...

Now, if some of the new advancements in solar cell tech are ever

actually released into commercial production, you might have a slightly

better argument, but no, solar still won't be able to even come close to

providing all of our energy needs.

Again - thorium reactors are the answer. 100% safe and far more

efficient, and far cheaper to run.

[Guest guest]

On 2011-06-20 5:07 PM, Dolores wrote:

> Cochrane is right. As more solar/wind comes online the cost will

> fall dramatically.

It will never even remotely approach the cost of energy from Thorium.

The cost for fueling a thorium reactor for a full year is about $10,000.

> And there is no waste to dispose of.

Nor is there with a Thorium reactor.

In fact, I have even read that a more advanced design of thorium reactor

can even use SPENT FUEL RODS from conventional nuclear reactors as a

fuel source.

[Guest guest]

On 2011-06-21 9:37 AM, wrote:

> Did you see the news today? Many nuclear power plants have leaks that

> contaminate the ground, and possibly water. They say, it is not as

> hazardous as other radioactives. It is in News this morning and

> investigative report by AP. Here you will how NRC and the private

> nuclear energy firms dance the waltz together.

Did you bother to check out the link I provided?

www.energyfromthorium.com

Thorium reactors simply do not suffer the same problems as conventional

nuclear reactors.