Re:reactor meltdowns possibly worst predicted scenario

[Guest guest]

" president " is a fraud. saudis are controlling US gov., no doubt about that. do

you know how many saudis now involved in government and around?...they are

interested in destroying US and they implementing this plan since the end of

WWII, step-by-step, very patiently, year after year

research on this is easy, try and you'll be shocked and probably won't believe

the facts. huffington post tries very hard to tell the truth, but they are

suppressed and censored by obama & ass.

On Jun 19, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Coconut Oil wrote:

> Re: reactor meltdowns possibly " worst predicted scenario "

> Posted by: " Bob Banever " bbanever@... moxaman2002

> Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:28 pm (PDT)

>

>

>

> Some media outlets are. Huffington Post has been carrying some news on this

> lately. What disturbes me the most is that our esteemed President has

> ordered the USDA to STOP testing for radioactivity in our air, water, and

> food claiming it's a waste of money and the amount of radioactivity is so

> small. I thought it was the government's job to protect it's citizens more

> than anything else... perhaps I was wrong. God help all of us.

>

> Bob

> Re: Re: reactor meltdowns possibly " worst

> predicted scenario "

>

> > Why is the media not saying anything at all about this??!! : (

> >

[Guest guest]

Please tell me that this group isn't going to degenerate into a political

bashing place. Your comments are outrageous and inappropriate.

Surely the POTUS can't be responsible for this as well ... get a grip and stay

on topic.

Take your political agenda to the many facebook groups dedicated to bashing,

trashing and dehumanizing the president, this is no place for it.

The reality is that there are ministers in charge of this sort of thing and the

POTUS is not an expert on such things and relies on their questionable expert

advice.

Got a problem, take it to the people that advise him, congress and sentate.

Geesh!

>

> > Re: reactor meltdowns possibly " worst predicted scenario "

> > Posted by: " Bob Banever " bbanever@... moxaman2002

> > Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:28 pm (PDT)

> >

> >

> >

> > Some media outlets are. Huffington Post has been carrying some news on this

> > lately. What disturbes me the most is that our esteemed President has

> > ordered the USDA to STOP testing for radioactivity in our air, water, and

> > food claiming it's a waste of money and the amount of radioactivity is so

> > small. I thought it was the government's job to protect it's citizens more

> > than anything else... perhaps I was wrong. God help all of us.

> >

> > Bob

> > Re: Re: reactor meltdowns possibly " worst

> > predicted scenario "

> >

> > > Why is the media not saying anything at all about this??!! : (

> > >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

--- well said may I add more

KEEP THE POLITICS OUT OF THIS GROUP!!!!!!!!!!

there I feel better now(smile)

mike

[Guest guest]

Thanks Little Scout. I totally agree. And as for the comment about the president

playing golf - puleeeze! Some people have very short memories regarding past

Republican presidents. And how many presidents in recent memory have faced as

many problems as has our current one? Yes, the comments are outrageous and

inappropriate.

As for the meltdown - I hope we all learn from it. NO MORE NUCLEAR PLANTS -

PERIOD!

Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go. So let's tell that to

congress and the president and stop bitching and moaning over what can't be

undone.

Dee

>

>

> Please tell me that this group isn't going to degenerate into a political

bashing place. Your comments are outrageous and inappropriate.

>

> Surely the POTUS can't be responsible for this as well ... get a grip and stay

on topic.

>

> Take your political agenda to the many facebook groups dedicated to bashing,

trashing and dehumanizing the president, this is no place for it.

>

> The reality is that there are ministers in charge of this sort of thing and

the POTUS is not an expert on such things and relies on their questionable

expert advice.

>

> Got a problem, take it to the people that advise him, congress and sentate.

>

> Geesh!

[Guest guest]

The much safer nuclear reactors that use thorium fuel seem to have a chance.

Very little radioactive residue on the order of many grams over ten years is

produced and the reactor can't explode or melt down. I agree with not using

uranium and plutonium but in this case of a thorium reactor they only use a bit

as a starter. The military can't use solar and wind in their subs and carriers

so we'll always have the starter available, and the threat of plutonium/HEU

reactors.

all good,

Duncan

> Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go. So let's tell that to

congress and the president and stop bitching and moaning over what can't be

undone.

>

> Dee

>

[Guest guest]

The truth about nuclear power:

http://www.grist.org/nuclear/2011-06-04-nuclear-power-is-expensive-and-uninsurab\

le

http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19990328edhughes7.asp

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2059453,00.html

Cochrane is right. As more solar/wind comes online the cost will fall

dramatically. And there is no waste to dispose of. If Germany, which has a

similar amount of sun as Cleveland Ohio, can go solar -I see no reason why this

country, which has a hugely sunny south and windy north, cannot convert to one

or the other, or combination of the two.

Dee

[Guest guest]

Did you see the news today? Many nuclear power plants have leaks that

contaminate the ground, and possibly water. They say, it is not as hazardous as

other radioactives. It is in News this morning and investigative report by

AP. Here you will how NRC and the private nuclear energy firms dance the waltz

together.

> > > As for the meltdown - I hope we all learn from it. NO MORE NUCLEAR

> > > PLANTS - PERIOD!

> > > Solar and wind is the only sensible, healthy way to go.

> >

> > Do you have any idea how naive this comment is?

> >

> > Let me put it another way - do you have any idea how many thousands of

> > square miles of wind turbine farms (or solar farms) it would take to

> > replace the total electricity generated by just ONE nuclear power plant?

> >

> > The solutions isn't to eliminate nuclear, the solution is to use SAFE

> > nuclear energy...

> >

> > www.energyfromthorium.com

> >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I have a great idea, why not start a new forum call “Nuclear Power, their

impact on our health and the the political fallout as a resultâ€, so that we

can get back to talking about Coconut oil products and their contribution to our

health and not having to on a daily basis delete tons of emails that have

nothing to do with our forum’s subject.

Thanks