Guest guest Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 Back in the 1980s, I was one of the very few people I knew who was using a computer. I doubt many of those folks are still using their VIC 20's, Apple ][ computers or IBM computers with dual floppy disks. They may own old computers, but they do not rely on them today. Budwig did important work, but that was a long time ago. Yet, there is not much in the way of coming up with adaptations of Budwig protocol which are even more effective. No researcher has all the answers. We keep discovering newer and better ways to understand health and disease. I used to be on a list pushing her diet. Some of the folks subjected themselves to radiation, chemo, and surgery while taking the Budwig protocol. Nobody ever talked about whether cancer remission came from Flax and cottage cheese, or from radiation/chemo/surgery. When people dropped off the list, was it because they were cured? Or because they died? To the best of my knowledge, no research was ever done to follow adherents of Budwig over a decade or longer. In times of great fear and uncertainty, many humans turn to religions and cults. Belief and faith cloud the mind and prevents folks from examining alternatives. To give an example. Drs Klenner and Cathcart did remarkable work using massive IV Vitamin C. Using liposomal Vitamin C taken orally can be just as effective as IV injections of Vitamin C, but at much lower doses. Thus more gentle on the human body. Same is true in other areas of Health and disease control. But when any particular health practice becomes enshrined by a cult of true believers, progress is brought to a halt. To my way of thinking, neither Craig nor Duncan can produce proof growing out of long-term studies. Duncan says " I think " which I feel is honest. Be nice if both Craig and Duncan agreed to disagree and ceased picking nits which just prolong this thread without adding any new hard information. Alobar On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, crgstef <crgstef@...> wrote: > Duncan, > Two words in your last sentence is important: " I think... " . Other people think otherwise, especially a Bio chemist that spent 50 years healing over 1,000 patients of cancer and other ailments. Maybe you should do a double blind test on the " CROW " protocol? > Craig > > >> > >> > Duncan, >> > Lets not forget that the substance created by the mixture of FO and CC is not either one but something different,and presumably a synergy is created. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 On 2011-03-15 11:30 PM, crgstef wrote: > Why would anyone use flaxseed oil? To become healthy or save their life, > I suppose. Then 'they' would be making a mistake... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 On 2011-03-16 12:21 AM, crgstef wrote: > Here is a partial. Not what you said you were looking for, but it's just > as good as yours. > " Flaxseed, Two points... flaxseed != flax seed oil I agree with Duncan that it is most likely the antioxidants/lignans that produced the beneficial results... although a 40 man study is not much of one, and 'did the best' is not much to go on as to actual results. Lastly, this study has nothing to do with the Budwig protocol, so is not directly supportive of her therapy, only WHOLE flaxseed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.