Guest guest Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 Could both positions possibly be true? I can see that if other food is not available, algea is the most complete wholistic food for the body... And at the same time, it may not be as complete in the same way as some other combinations of vitamins, etc.  It could really depend on how you both define your terms. d From: Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...> Subject: Re: gender differences? Coconut Oil Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 5:16 PM  Carol, I understand why algae is good for you, but not why you strongly adhere to the theory that it is a complete nutritional solution and no other supplement would be required, when the theory is unsupported by company literature and nutritional analyses. Please tell us you're not " teaching " people that, Carol! all good, Duncan > > I had decided I wouldn't post any more about this subject because people are getting really sick of this. But, really Duncan??? I can't believe you are still attacking my " theory " , as you call it, because you just have no clue as to the merits of the product. There is no way I can teach people about whole food supplements if they are not willing to learn. You do not hear/understand what I am saying. > > Carol > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 Don, the reason both positions can't possibly be true is that the claim that this particular blue-green algae was nutritionally complete without requiring any supplementation, contradicting both the company data and the research data, which agree that it contains only traces or less of some important nutrients, like any other food or superfood. I agree with getting the terms properly defined, so I got Carol to repeat her claim of nutritional completeness without any supplemtation; this she did without ambiguity. As to being the most complete of the whole foods, all of whioh have their deficiencies, maybe, maybe not. No direct comparison has been made between the various genuine algaes, chlorophyll-containing bacteria such as blue green algae, and other bacteria that are being used or being considered as food, but there are a lot of research documents that laid down the data. Regardless, it's all about concentration, and even at large servings the US military could not use algae exclusively without running into deficiencies. If one had to choose only one food to live on on the proverbial desert island, mine would be full fat undenatured whey, which is a near-perfect match to the biological requirements of mammals. I think it would allow me to outlast anyone who is on exclusively algae, because I wouldn't be experiencing the dietary deficencies in branched chain amino acids, essential fatty acids and bonded cysteine, all of which are very low in algae and high in whey. all good, Duncan > > Could both positions possibly be true? > I can see that if other food is not available, algea is the most > complete wholistic food for the body... > > And at the same time, it may not be as complete in the same way as some other combinations of vitamins, etc.  It could really depend on how you both define your terms. > > d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 Hi Duncan, you said: > If one had to choose only one food to live on on the proverbial desert island, mine would be full fat undenatured whey, which is a near-perfect match to the biological requirements of mammals. I think it would allow me to outlast anyone who is on exclusively algae, because I wouldn't be experiencing the dietary deficencies in branched chain amino acids, essential fatty acids and bonded cysteine, all of which are very low in algae and high in whey. COMMENT: Would not colostrum be a better choice? It is a complete food (as I understand it) for both young and old, plus anti-aging. Love and Laughter, Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 I've never thought of colostrum as a staple food because an IGF-1 dose of 5 times what a body builder takes could be a problem. If it's not, then yes colostrum would be a good choice but I don't have the details handy for a direct comparison. all good, Duncan > > > Hi Duncan, > > you said: > > If one had to choose only one food to live on on the proverbial desert island, mine would be full fat undenatured whey, which is a near-perfect match to the biological requirements of mammals. I think it would allow me to outlast anyone who is on exclusively algae, because I wouldn't be experiencing the dietary deficencies in branched chain amino acids, essential fatty acids and bonded cysteine, all of which are very low in algae and high in whey. > > COMMENT: > Would not colostrum be a better choice? It is a complete food (as I understand it) for both young and old, plus anti-aging. > > Love and Laughter, > Anne > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.