Guest guest Posted February 18, 2011 Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 The writer Bob Taft mistook sodium benzoate for bromide as the main preservative in processed food, and he has no other argument against bromide except for his mistake. But let's read on anyway It's true that some citrus soft drinks, kelp, seaweed, nuts, and some baked goods in some countries do contain a trace of bromide. Brominism and bromide hypersensitivity has occurred; this has been identified as a very rare event. They reported on these rare events just to prove that it's possible at all: ><http://www.websciences.org/cftemplate/NAPS/archives/indiv.cfm?ID=19972635> ><http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/348/19/1932> As to the rest of the rant/argument, it's about chlorine and fluorine in your water and toothpaste. No argument there, but if one limits their exposure to bromide-containing pop, fluoride, and chlorine, they have it beat and the story ends there The primary source of methanol that Hulda pursued comes not from trace external sources but from one's own gut dysbiosis; the exact mechanism is described with regard to 's approach in my inulin references: http://tinyurl.com/inulins When we treat gut dysbiosis, methanol production drops to near zero. Again, end of story. I did good - two myths down in a single day all good, Duncan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.