Guest guest Posted July 21, 2003 Report Share Posted July 21, 2003 Hi ... I have heard from several specialists that the only true way to measure leg length differences is with full x-rays of both legs. Most people with scoliosis have a tilted pelvis, which makes their legs appear uneven. Leg length discrepancy does not cause scoliosis. At least not with everyone. I have a niece who has a 1-1/2 " leg length discrepancy. Because of her relationship to me, we were sure it was a spine problem, and she went to a scoliosis specialist. He found that she has an absolutely normal spine, but x-rays of both legs showed the significant difference. I think that leg length discrepancies of 1/2 " or under are considered normal. I've tried using a lift in one shoe, but it didn't seem to make any difference. I've known other people who swear by their lift. I think it's just one more way of demonstrating that we're all very different. -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 I love that: 'potentially modifiable risk factor".............'spose they'll ever figure out that it is a pelvis obliquity problem? But a GREAT study to show that it is, in fact, a secondary component. Sunny Sunny Kierstyn, RN DC Fibromyalgia Care Center of Oregon 2677 Willakenzie Road, 7CEugene, Oregon, 97401541- 654-0850; Fx; 541- 654-0834www.drsunnykierstyn.com From: dcdocbrian@...Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 08:46:56 -0700Subject: Leg Length New Study. Greg Oden?? Seitz, DC Tuality Physicians 730-D SE Oak St Hillsboro, OR 97123 (503)640-3724 Association of Leg-Length Inequality With Knee Osteoarthritis A Cohort Study F. Harvey, MD, MSc; Mei Yang, PhD; Theodore D.V. Cooke, MA, MB, BChir; Neil A. Segal, MD, MS; Lane, MD; Cora E. , MD, MSPH; and T. Felson, MD, MPH +Author Affiliations From Boston University School of Medicine and Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; University of California at , , California; and University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama. Abstract Background: Leg-length inequality is common in the general population and may accelerate development of knee osteoarthritis. Objective: To determine whether leg-length inequality is associated with prevalent, incident, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Population samples from Birmingham, Alabama, and Iowa City, Iowa. Patients: 3026 participants aged 50 to 79 years with or at high risk for knee osteoarthritis. Measurements: The exposure was leg-length inequality, measured by full-limb radiography. The outcomes were prevalent, incident, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Radiographic osteoarthritis was defined as Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or greater, and symptomatic osteoarthritis was defined as radiographic disease in a consistently painful knee. Results: Compared with leg-length inequality less than 1 cm, leg-length inequality of 1 cm or more was associated with prevalent radiographic (53% vs. 36%; odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.5 to 2.4]) and symptomatic (30% vs. 17%; OR, 2.0 [CI, 1.6 to 2.6]) osteoarthritis in the shorter leg, incident symptomatic osteoarthritis in the shorter leg (15% vs. 9%; OR, 1.7 [CI, 1.2 to 2.4]) and the longer leg (13% vs. 9%; OR, 1.5 [CI, 1.0 to 2.1]), and increased odds of progressive osteoarthritis in the shorter leg (29% vs. 24%; OR, 1.3 [CI, 1.0 to 1.7]). Limitations: Duration of follow-up may not be long enough to adequately identify cases of incidence and progression. Measurements of leg length, including radiography, are subject to measurement error, which could result in misclassification. Conclusion: Radiographic leg-length inequality was associated with prevalent, incident symptomatic, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Leg-length inequality is a potentially modifiable risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Aging. The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Leg Length New Study. Greg Oden?? Seitz, DC Tuality Physicians 730-D SE Oak St Hillsboro, OR 97123 (503)640-3724 Association of Leg-Length Inequality With Knee Osteoarthritis A Cohort Study F. Harvey, MD, MSc; Mei Yang, PhD; Theodore D.V. Cooke, MA, MB, BChir; Neil A. Segal, MD, MS; Lane, MD; Cora E. , MD, MSPH; and T. Felson, MD, MPH +Author Affiliations From Boston University School of Medicine and Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; University of California at , , California; and University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama. Abstract Background: Leg-length inequality is common in the general population and may accelerate development of knee osteoarthritis. Objective: To determine whether leg-length inequality is associated with prevalent, incident, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Population samples from Birmingham, Alabama, and Iowa City, Iowa. Patients: 3026 participants aged 50 to 79 years with or at high risk for knee osteoarthritis. Measurements: The exposure was leg-length inequality, measured by full-limb radiography. The outcomes were prevalent, incident, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Radiographic osteoarthritis was defined as Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or greater, and symptomatic osteoarthritis was defined as radiographic disease in a consistently painful knee. Results: Compared with leg-length inequality less than 1 cm, leg-length inequality of 1 cm or more was associated with prevalent radiographic (53% vs. 36%; odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.5 to 2.4]) and symptomatic (30% vs. 17%; OR, 2.0 [CI, 1.6 to 2.6]) osteoarthritis in the shorter leg, incident symptomatic osteoarthritis in the shorter leg (15% vs. 9%; OR, 1.7 [CI, 1.2 to 2.4]) and the longer leg (13% vs. 9%; OR, 1.5 [CI, 1.0 to 2.1]), and increased odds of progressive osteoarthritis in the shorter leg (29% vs. 24%; OR, 1.3 [CI, 1.0 to 1.7]). Limitations: Duration of follow-up may not be long enough to adequately identify cases of incidence and progression. Measurements of leg length, including radiography, are subject to measurement error, which could result in misclassification. Conclusion: Radiographic leg-length inequality was associated with prevalent, incident symptomatic, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Leg-length inequality is a potentially modifiable risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Aging. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2011 Report Share Posted May 7, 2011 I am having THR in the morning. Has anyone had a leg length difference after this surgery?> > Thanks, First LTKR was done Oct 5 2010 I did notice the new and oh so much improved knee did feel taller then then the right which needed it done also.. I even mentiond it to a few family members and one of then said to stand on one foot and measure yourself and then stand on the other foot and do the same...amazingly it measured 1 " taller.. the knew knee was now again straight instead of being bowed out.. after having the RTKR done Feb 25, 2011 I no longer have that feeling ... I did mention it to my surgeon and he said the difference was so slight that he didn't think I should have noticed a height difference in walking.. so maybe some of us are just more sensitive to things like that.. :-) Donna M Mi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.