Guest guest Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Hi Adelaide, I'm not even an LP (but am definitely on the shorter side of AH at 160cm) and find that most jeans have about 6 inches of excess material! I really need to find the time to get the sewing machine out! I have been VERY lucky when it comes to 's clothing tho, long shorts are still in for boys, and the long denim ones fit him great for jeans and the shorter ones fir great for long shorts! He is 12 and the only thing I've HAD to adjust is his school uniform sweatshirt as the smallest size is a 10 and he is now in a 7. Caela > > Have you guys noticed the latest fashion trend these days are the > sleeves that hang WAY beyond the " normal " length of an average > person?!! So if they are too long for even an average person, then > what about US?!! Just recently I happened to try something on, and > I kid you not, the sleeves hung BELOW my knees!!! And there is no way > to try to roll them up, as there is nowhere for all that bulk of extra > material > (on us, we're talking YARDS, folks) to be redistributed! Then what if you > need to put a coat on over all that bulk?!! It doesn't happen easily. > Also, > one's dignity may even be lost momentarily when attempting this feat in a > crowded place. > > It's not just the sleeves that are much longer, but jeans for both men > and women. For the trend in some styles these days, is to have jeans SO > LONG one either keeps stepping on them, or they drag...something many of us > have put up with for years. Who ever would have thought we were wearing > these latest trends in fashion, huh?!! > > Still, there are those brief rare moments of shopping for clothes, I > would give almost anything to be able to just buy something off the rack > that actually fit like it does on the model, wouldn't you? ; ) > > Adelaide, with the WAY too long sleeves > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I haven't seen that, extra material, as much, but what I have seen is this and it's both, stupid and funny. I will be shopping for a men's small size dress shirt, which is typically size, 14 & 1/2, and often clothing stores, even the big chains, will have the shirts according to size on the wall in tiers. So, the top level/rung is size small, then medium (size 15 & 1/2) is on the middle tier, then large (16 & 1/2) on the bottom tier or the one closest to the floor or the one nearest to my height level too:P. Now, aside from any dwarfs who may be shopping for small shirts, just say that we forget them totally as we're a rare group to begin with, but what about average sized petite men? Where is their shirts to be found, on the top tier! It doesn't make sense:P. I never could figure out the reasoning behind that one, because for the most part even petite/ shorter than average men, their arm length or reach is also shorter, so why the top tier/rung? my 2 cents, grady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.