Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Rich, Thank you for your well thought out email. I agree with you completely and I sincerely appreciate your comments. You are right about the politics behind this. It seems that almost every researcher that has come out with research demonstrating that these things are indeed extremely dangerous has been bashed and harrassed with the attempt to discredit by a group of professional " debunkers " working in both the military and the industry. I understand that many of these scientists have had their fundings cut and a number have been forced to leave their univeristy positions. My area has been in what have been called the " soft " sciences - mainly psychology and education - and I remember when I was a university student the emerging paradigm at the time was to follow the so-called " hard " sciences in trying to quantify everything with statistics, which I couldn't help but feel was a major mistake. I believe Einstein once said " Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted. " I guess my feeling was that in the real world, there are just too many factors acting on us to affect our individual behavior and that in the real world no two incidents will ever repeat themselves - hence the ever unfolding novelty in the world. I looked at chaos theory a bit and I believe the paradigm here backs up what I am saying. Thus, what happens in the real world is much different than in a laboratory or in a test tube where the factors can be controlled. (And maybe that is the problem with this kind of mindset - the need to control.) Probably the best we can do is make predictions. I also believe that someone once asked Einsten what constitutes scientific proof and he replied something like " I am sorry young man, that is much too difficult of a question for me to answer. " In this day and age, what constitutes " scientific proof " seems to be what the big corporations want you to believe is scientifically " proven. " On the other hand, while I don't believe in " scientific proof " per se, I think that we can produce enough evidence to show that one thing does and will affect another - a cause and effect relationship. Subsequently, it seems to be that there is more than enough evidence out there to warrant action on this issue. Unfortunately, when we add in the factors of economics, politics, manipulation, and delusion, then the effect is that this probably will not happen until many many more people get sick and people eventually start to put the pieces of the puzzle together. I wasn't familar with C.P. Snow's talk but I think that you probably would be very interested in reading A. Kolb's book " Experiential Learning: Experience As the Source of Leaning and Development " since he takes this to a completely different level: " When one examines academic disciplines in the four major groupings we have identified - the social professions, the science-based professions, humanities/social science,, and natural science/ mathematics - it becomes apparent that what constitutes " valid " [italics mine] knowledge in these four groupings differs widely. ....Synthetic knowledge structures learned via apprehension are associated with qualitative, humanistic fields, whereas analytic knowledge structures learned via comprehension are related to the quantitative scientific fields, dispersive knowledge structures learned via extension are related to the professions and applied sciences, and integrative knowledge structures learned via intention are related to the basic academic disciplines. " " p. 123 While it is necessary to a degree to have all these scientists (the analysts) out there barking up their trees, it is also necessary to have those who can also look at the whole forest - the big picture - and put the pieces together (the synthesists). Unfortunately, it seems that we have more of the former than the later. Regards, paul doyon > > > > Rich, > > > > I wouldn't get too caught up in the conceptions of things because > > sometimes they can blind us to what is actually real - what is > > actually in front of our eyes, what we feel, i.e, our perceptions. > > There are two ways of knowing the world - thru our apprehensions > and > > our comprehensions. Unfortunately, people are sometimes blinded by > > their comprehensions. But for people who are electrosensitive it > is > > the perceptions that reign. My personal experience is that I can > > tolerate EMFs much better since I chelated the metals out of my > body. > > I don't need any so-called " scientific " proof for this. I know > what I > > feel and I know what I apprehend and this forms the basis for my > > conceptions and my comprehensions. I hope that makes sense. Sorry > if > > it sounds pedantic. > > > > Peace, > > > > paul > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Rich wrote: _Anyway, , I'm not your enemy. (Now that you know I was in Army research and also that I worked on nuclear waste, you may have your doubts about that!) I just think that you would benefit by getting some scientific support, if science is not your bag, personally. Otherwise, I think the number of allies you will have in your cause will be limited._ Hi Rich, No, I never perceived you as such. Sorry if I came on a bit strong - I think I am in the " reactive " phase after receiving so much slack from a number of people (not on this list thank God) about my posts. There was a book called " Our Stolen Future " by Theo Coleborn, that was brilliant in the respect that it was able to look at all these studies and put together the pieces creating a clear picture of what all these chemicals are doing to our bodies. Certainly made me think twice about eating fish - though I think little has changed with regards to protecting the environment ( especially with the present administration, I might add). So I think what we need now is a good book tying all the research together on how microwaves are affecting our bodies and the environment. Both my apprehensions and my comprehensions tell me it isn't good. At any rate, it sounds to me like you are trying to fix problems created by others (while my view would be not to create the problems in the first place, but...). Out of curiosity, though, why the interest in CFS? Many researchers (e.g. Nicolson, Goldberg) have delved into this area because a family member had become afflicted with this condition. Of course, my personal interest had to do with my own experience with it. Regards, paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Rich, I was just curious - since you have worked with nuclear waste - if you were familiar with the symptoms of radiation poisoning, e.g. people working in nuclear power plants who were exposed to an inordinate amount of radiation or people that were exposed to nuclear plant accidents like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. (I understand that in the later case there was a cover-up about the effects - e.g. deformed fetuses, etc.) I guess what I am getting at here is whether there is any similarity here with the symptoms of CFS? peace, paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 , You mention nuclear waste. It got me to thinking, do you know if anyone has done a geographical study of CFS and fibro patients? Is there any kind of trend based on nuclear power plants? I ask because I live in Toledo, OH. If you aren't familiar, we have 2 large nuclear power plants within a 50(?) mile radius. ( Bessy and sburg). I just wonder if this could be in any way related to my illness. Thanks, Dawn Rich, I was just curious - since you have worked with nuclear waste - if you were familiar with the symptoms of radiation poisoning, e.g. people working in nuclear power plants who were exposed to an inordinate amount of radiation or people that were exposed to nuclear plant accidents like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. (I understand that in the later case there was a cover-up about the effects - e.g. deformed fetuses, etc.) I guess what I am getting at here is whether there is any similarity here with the symptoms of CFS? peace, paul It’s the future of Hotmail: Try Windows Live Mail beta http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en-us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, . > > _Anyway, , I'm not your enemy. > > Hi Rich, > > No, I never perceived you as such. ***I'm glad. > > Sorry if I came on a bit strong - I think I am in the " reactive " > phase after receiving so much slack from a number of people (not on > this list thank God) about my posts. ***I understand. There was a book called " Our > Stolen Future " by Theo Coleborn, that was brilliant in the respect > that it was able to look at all these studies and put together the > pieces creating a clear picture of what all these chemicals are doing > to our bodies. Certainly made me think twice about eating fish - > though I think little has changed with regards to protecting the > environment ( especially with the present administration, I might > add). So I think what we need now is a good book tying all the > research together on how microwaves are affecting our bodies and the > environment. Both my apprehensions and my comprehensions tell me it > isn't good. ***That would be an interesting book. > > At any rate, it sounds to me like you are trying to fix problems > created by others (while my view would be not to create the problems > in the first place, but...). ***I would prefer that, too, but I wasn't born into that kind of world. > Out of curiosity, though, why the interest in CFS? Many researchers > (e.g. Nicolson, Goldberg) have delved into this area because a family > member had become afflicted with this condition. Of course, my > personal interest had to do with my own experience with it. ***I got started by trying to help a woman who was a friend of my wife and myself, about ten years ago. I thought it would be simpler than it turned out to be. I have an obsessive nature, and don't like to give up on trying to solve a problem, once I've started on it (I have to be very careful what I start, for that reason). I also find CFS fascinating and tantalizing. I know the answers are there. They just need to be found. Along the way, I've become acquainted with a large number of people who have CFS. I like them, and I want to see them become well. I'm also a Christian, and helping others is something I get a big bang out of. I'm retired, and this gives me something more interesting to do than sit in a rocking chair. I probably have other motives that I don't even recognize. Accurately knowing one's own motives can be elusive, because one can easily deceive oneself. > > Regards, > > paul > ***Best wishes, ***Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, . Most of the information about that has come from people who have received radiation for cancer therapy. They are easier to study, because there are a lot more of them, and they have received carefully measured doses. A lot of them do have fatigue, and the mechanism isn't very well understood. I received radiation therapy myself when I had rectal cancer about 8 years ago, and I did experience quite a bit of fatigue. (Of course, I was getting chemotherapy as well, and that really wipes you out, too.) There are a few papers in the literature about it, mostly from Italy. Here's an abstract of a recent one: " Rays. 2005 Apr-Jun;30(2):197-203. Radiotherapy-related fatigue: incidence and predictive factors. Turriziani A, Mattiucci GC, Montoro C, Ferro M, Maurizi F, Smaniotto D, Cellini N. Cattedra di Radioterapia, Universita Cattolica del S. Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy. aturriziani@... Radiotherapy-induced fatigue is a common early and chronic side- effect of irradiation, reported in up to 80% and 30% of patients respectively during radiation therapy and at follow-up visits.The factors that cause fatigue and the exact mechanisms responsible for its production, sustenance, or amelioration are not well understood. Multiple correlates and mechanisms have been proposed in the literature and integrated within models of cancer-related fatigue. A multidimensional approach in clinical practice is proposed based on the evaluation of cancer-related fatigue, and on the development of an adequate management. The monitoring system of fatigue used by the authors is presented. " It's true that the radiation exposure was considerable to many people from the Chernobyl accident. That was a graphite moderated reactor without a containment building. Because of a combination of economic expediency, design blunders, and foolhardy decisions about doing experiments on a power reactor, the graphite caught fire and cooked off large amounts of fission products, exposing large areas to radioactive material. The Three Mile Island accident was quite different. That was a water-moderated reactor with a pressure vessel and a containment building. It was designed and operated under much more stringent regulations, though still not what they should have been. The accident was caused by a steam pressure relief valve sticking open, and operators who were not well enough trained to understand what was happening. Part of the reactor core melted, and radionuclides were released to the inside of the containment building, but the only releases from the containment building to the environment around the plant were noble gases, such as krypton and xenon. Radionuclides of these gases are not very hazardous, because if someone inhales them, they are soon exhaled, because they are not chemically reactive and therefore do not become incorporated in the body. Doses to people were quite small, and there weren't any measurable effects. I don't think there is any truth to there being a cover-up of effects. For one thing, it would be very difficult to cover up something like that. Everyone knew about the accident, and lots of people study phenomena like that. Nuclear power has lots of detractors, I think the funding would be available, and there are lots of journals that would publish evidence of something like that. The fact is that the doses were too small to do much. For doses less than about 10 Rems (0.1 Sievert), there's no observable effect, even in long-term cancer rates. I went to a conference in Snowbird, Utah, shortly after that accident, and the purpose was to try to understand why the releases were so small. People had expected much worse from an accident of that type, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had required large evacuation areas around nuclear plants in the event of accidents, for that reason. It had been expected that there would be a significant release of radioactive iodine from that type of core-melt accident, but there wasn't. The reason was that because it was water-moderated and cooled, there was plenty of water around, and the iodine remained in the water as dissolved iodide and iodate. People had not done their chemistry correctly when they modeled the potential accidents. At Chernobyl, on the other hand, trhe iodine went off as molecular iodine gas, along with a host of other radioactive species. The graphite burned very hot and for a long time. It would have been difficult to design a worse disperser of radionuclides if you tried. That was very sad. Rich > > Rich, > > I was just curious - since you have worked with nuclear waste - if you were > familiar with the symptoms of radiation poisoning, e.g. people working in > nuclear power plants who were exposed to an inordinate amount of radiation > or people that were exposed to nuclear plant accidents like Chernobyl or > Three Mile Island. (I understand that in the later case there was a cover-up > about the effects - e.g. deformed fetuses, etc.) > > I guess what I am getting at here is whether there is any similarity here with > the symptoms of CFS? > > peace, > > paul > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Dawn, I think it could very well be a factor in this illness - both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. paul > > , > You mention nuclear waste. It got me to thinking, do you know if anyone has done a geographical study of CFS and fibro patients? Is there any kind of trend based on nuclear power plants? I ask because I live in Toledo, OH. If you aren't familiar, we have 2 large nuclear power plants within a 50(?) mile radius. ( Bessy and sburg). I just wonder if this could be in any way related to my illness. > Thanks, > Dawn > > > > Rich, I was just curious - since you have worked with nuclear waste - if you were familiar with the symptoms of radiation poisoning, e.g. people working in nuclear power plants who were exposed to an inordinate amount of radiation or people that were exposed to nuclear plant accidents like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. (I understand that in the later case there was a cover-up about the effects - e.g. deformed fetuses, etc.) I guess what I am getting at here is whether there is any similarity here with the symptoms of CFS? peace, paul > > It's the future of Hotmail: Try Windows Live Mail beta > http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en- us > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, Dawn. The only study of this type of which I'm aware is described in this abstract: Popul Health Metr. 2004 Feb 4;2(1):1. Regional distribution of fatiguing illnesses in the United States: a pilot study. Bierl C, Nisenbaum R, Hoaglin DC, Randall B, AB, Unger ER, Reeves WC. Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. wcr1@... BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating illness with no known cause or effective therapy. Population-based epidemiologic data on CFS prevalence are critical to put CFS in a realistic context for public health officials and others responsible for allocating resources. METHODS: We conducted a pilot random-digit- dialing survey to estimate the prevalence of fatiguing illnesses in different geographic regions and in urban and rural populations of the United States. This report focuses on 884 of 7,317 respondents 18 to 69 years old. Fatigued (440) and randomly selected non- fatigued (444) respondents completed telephone questionnaires concerning fatigue, other symptoms, and medical history. RESULTS: We estimated 12,186 per 100,000 persons 18 to 69 years of age suffered from fatigue lasting for at least 6 months (chronic fatigue), and 1,197 per 100,000 described an illness that, though lacking clinical evaluation, met criteria for CFS (CFS-like). Chronic fatigue and CFS- like illness were more common in rural than in urban populations, although the differences were not significant. The prevalence of these fatiguing illnesses did not differ meaningfully among the four regions surveyed, and no significant geographic trends were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation estimated that nearly 2.2 million American adults suffer from CFS-like illness. The study also suggested the need to focus future investigations of fatigue on populations with lower incomes and less education. There was no evidence for regional differences in the occurrence of fatiguing illnesses. PMID: 14761250 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] As you can see, they did not find evidence for regional differences in the occurrence of fatiguing illnesses. I don't think anyone has specifically studied whether there is a higher occurrence of CFS near nuclear power plants. I would doubt that there would be, because emissions of radioactive material from these plants are pretty tightly controlled. I would be more concerned about coal-fired power plants, because they release mercury into the atmosphere. As you know, I think there are some similarities in the causes of CFS and autism, and there was a study done in Texas not long ago in which a correlation was found between the occurrence of autism and the levels of environmentally released mercury. Here's the abstract: Health Place. 2006 Jun;12(2):203-9. Environmental mercury release, special education rates, and autism disorder: an ecological study of Texas. Palmer RF, Blanchard S, Stein Z, Mandell D, C. University of Texas Health Science Center, San Department of Family and Community Medicine, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San , Texas 78229-3900, USA. palmer@... The association between environmentally released mercury, special education and autism rates in Texas was investigated using data from the Texas Education Department and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. A Poisson regression analysis adjusted for school district population size, economic and demographic factors was used. There was a significant increase in the rates of special education students and autism rates associated with increases in environmentally released mercury. On average, for each 1,000 lb of environmentally released mercury, there was a 43% increase in the rate of special education services and a 61% increase in the rate of autism. The association between environmentally released mercury and special education rates were fully mediated by increased autism rates. This ecological study suggests the need for further research regarding the association between environmentally released mercury and developmental disorders such as autism. These results have implications for policy planning and cost analysis. PMID: 16338635 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Rich > > , > You mention nuclear waste. It got me to thinking, do you know if anyone has done a geographical study of CFS and fibro patients? Is there any kind of trend based on nuclear power plants? I ask because I live in Toledo, OH. If you aren't familiar, we have 2 large nuclear power plants within a 50(?) mile radius. ( Bessy and sburg). I just wonder if this could be in any way related to my illness. > Thanks, > Dawn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Rich, The more time I spend here, the more I realize I don't know! I was not aware that coal-fired power plants released mercury into the environment. How can that be legal? Are these type of power plants common? Do you know how I can find out if I live near any of them? I was a special ed major in college (before I changed my major to nursing during my fourth year- student teaching-long story), so the autism connection is near and dear to my heart. Once again, thanks for the info, Dawn I would be more concerned about coal-fired power plants, because > they release mercury into the atmosphere. As you know, I think > there are some similarities in the causes of CFS and autism, and > there was a study done in Texas not long ago in which a correlation > was found between the occurrence of autism and the levels of > environmentally released mercury. Because e-mail on your cell phone should be easy: Try Windows Live Mail for Mobile beta http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en-us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 This is a very interesting study (the second one about environmental mercury release and Autism). Could increased mercury cause increased sensitivity to non-ionizing radiation such as the microwaves from cell phones? That could explain a lot about PWC being EMF sensitive. SPAM-MED: Re: cell phones Hi, Dawn. The only study of this type of which I'm aware is described in this abstract: Popul Health Metr. 2004 Feb 4;2(1):1. Regional distribution of fatiguing illnesses in the United States: a pilot study. Bierl C, Nisenbaum R, Hoaglin DC, Randall B, AB, Unger ER, Reeves WC. Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. wcr1@... BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating illness with no known cause or effective therapy. Population-based epidemiologic data on CFS prevalence are critical to put CFS in a realistic context for public health officials and others responsible for allocating resources. METHODS: We conducted a pilot random-digit- dialing survey to estimate the prevalence of fatiguing illnesses in different geographic regions and in urban and rural populations of the United States. This report focuses on 884 of 7,317 respondents 18 to 69 years old. Fatigued (440) and randomly selected non- fatigued (444) respondents completed telephone questionnaires concerning fatigue, other symptoms, and medical history. RESULTS: We estimated 12,186 per 100,000 persons 18 to 69 years of age suffered from fatigue lasting for at least 6 months (chronic fatigue), and 1,197 per 100,000 described an illness that, though lacking clinical evaluation, met criteria for CFS (CFS-like). Chronic fatigue and CFS- like illness were more common in rural than in urban populations, although the differences were not significant. The prevalence of these fatiguing illnesses did not differ meaningfully among the four regions surveyed, and no significant geographic trends were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation estimated that nearly 2.2 million American adults suffer from CFS-like illness. The study also suggested the need to focus future investigations of fatigue on populations with lower incomes and less education. There was no evidence for regional differences in the occurrence of fatiguing illnesses. PMID: 14761250 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] As you can see, they did not find evidence for regional differences in the occurrence of fatiguing illnesses. I don't think anyone has specifically studied whether there is a higher occurrence of CFS near nuclear power plants. I would doubt that there would be, because emissions of radioactive material from these plants are pretty tightly controlled. I would be more concerned about coal-fired power plants, because they release mercury into the atmosphere. As you know, I think there are some similarities in the causes of CFS and autism, and there was a study done in Texas not long ago in which a correlation was found between the occurrence of autism and the levels of environmentally released mercury. Here's the abstract: Health Place. 2006 Jun;12(2):203-9. Environmental mercury release, special education rates, and autism disorder: an ecological study of Texas. Palmer RF, Blanchard S, Stein Z, Mandell D, C. University of Texas Health Science Center, San Department of Family and Community Medicine, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San , Texas 78229-3900, USA. palmer@... The association between environmentally released mercury, special education and autism rates in Texas was investigated using data from the Texas Education Department and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. A Poisson regression analysis adjusted for school district population size, economic and demographic factors was used. There was a significant increase in the rates of special education students and autism rates associated with increases in environmentally released mercury. On average, for each 1,000 lb of environmentally released mercury, there was a 43% increase in the rate of special education services and a 61% increase in the rate of autism. The association between environmentally released mercury and special education rates were fully mediated by increased autism rates. This ecological study suggests the need for further research regarding the association between environmentally released mercury and developmental disorders such as autism. These results have implications for policy planning and cost analysis. PMID: 16338635 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Rich > > , > You mention nuclear waste. It got me to thinking, do you know if anyone has done a geographical study of CFS and fibro patients? Is there any kind of trend based on nuclear power plants? I ask because I live in Toledo, OH. If you aren't familiar, we have 2 large nuclear power plants within a 50(?) mile radius. ( Bessy and sburg). I just wonder if this could be in any way related to my illness. > Thanks, > Dawn This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 I have thought about that too, not just mercury but the other tonage of metals in my mouth in crowns, I think I 'could be' a cell tower, much less be affected by one :-/ Marcia RE: Re: cell phones This is a very interesting study (the second one about environmental mercury release and Autism). Could increased mercury cause increased sensitivity to non-ionizing radiation such as the microwaves from cell phones? That could explain a lot about PWC being EMF sensitive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, Kurt. I don't knoww the answer to that question, but my guess is that it wouldn't. The reason is that mercury in the body is bound to sulfhydryl groups in enzymes and other proteins. I don't know of a way in which electromagnetic waves could couple to bound mercury ions any differently than to other ions normally in the body. You might be interested to know what Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker thinks about this. I think that his concept is at least plausible from the standpoints of physics, biochemistry and physiology, but I don't know of experimental studies to test them. His idea is this: It is known that many PWCs, as part of their illness, have central diabetes insipidus (not the same as the more common diabetes mellitus). In central diabetes insipidus, the hypothalamus does not put out enough arginine vasopressin (aka antiduretic hormone). He believes this is a result of the Biotoxin Pathway that he has developed to describe the effects in genetically susceptible people of disorders in which there are biotoxins. This is described in his book Mold Warriors, and I won't go into his whole theory. I have other views about why the hypothalamus doesn't put out enough vasopressin in many cases of CFS in which there is not a biotoxin issue (i.e. glutathione depletion). In any case, getting back to the low vasopressin, the result of this is that the kidneys dump more water into the urine than they should. This causes the person to become dehydrated, i.e. their blood has less water in it than normal. The person is always thirsty, and drinks a lot of water, but they never keep up with the urination, so they are always partially dehydrated. This much is pretty well established. The result of the dehydration is that the total blood volume drops, and the blood becomes more concentrated in salts than normal. This is also well established in central diabetes insipidus. Dr. Shoemaker then suggests that the person's sweat is more concentrated in salts as well. He says that PWCs have more concentrated sweat than do people with cystic fibrosis, and they were formerly thought to have the most concentrated sweat of anyone. I don't know if he or someone else has measured the galvanic skin response in PWCs to see if this is actually true. Dr. Shoemaker goes on to say that because of the higher salt concentration on the skin, people with CFS have higher electrical conductivity in this layer, and they are thus better conductors. He says this comes into play with static electricity, such as from grounded electrical switch cover plates, door knobs and other grounded conducting objects, and that PWCs readily get static electric shocks from them. He also says that PWCs can turn off electric watches by touching them. If the skin is indeed more electrically conducting in PWCs, then I think it is reasonable to expect that electromagnetic waves from the environment would induce higher currents in the skin of PWCs than in the skin of other people. (It is a fact fact from electromagnetic theory that high frequency currents are confined to the surfaces of conductors, a phenomenon known as the " skin effect. " ) So in this model, PWCs would basically be acting as better antennas. That's about as far as I can go with this at this point. I don't know how much higher the skin currents would be, nor do I know how they might affect the person's physiology. Since the nervous system operates by transfer of electrical charges in the form of ions, I think that it would be the main candidate for a body system that might respond to surface currents on the skin, if there is any response at all. Since the nervous system is so important to controlling body functions, if the electromagnetic waves were indeed able to couple to it, there might be some interesting effects. I would say that a model that went something like that would be at least plausible, though what I've written here only goes so far, and also the various parts of it are not proven. Rich > > This is a very interesting study (the second one about environmental > mercury release and Autism). Could increased mercury cause increased > sensitivity to non-ionizing radiation such as the microwaves from cell > phones? That could explain a lot about PWC being EMF sensitive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, Dawn. The EPA-allowed amount of mercury release from coal-fired power plants has been a very contentious issue. A small amount of mercury is found naturally in coal, and when coal is burned, the mercury is vaporized. To prevent its release is expensive, because the volume of exhaust gas from these large plants is huge, and separating mercury out is expensive. It therefore raises the cost of generating electricity, and that's a cost that affects industry and consumers. The more you take out, the more expensive it is, so you have to draw the line somewhere, and there have been big battles over this. Yes, coal-fired power plants are very common. They are one of the main contributors to electricity generation in this country, particularly in the eastern part of the U.S. There aren't any in California, where I live, for example, because it would be a long distance to have to move the coal, and that would make it more expensive. It takes huge trainloads of coal continuously to feed the big coal-fired power plants. Most of the coal deposits are in the east. Most of the mercury that ends up in fish comes from coal-fired power plants originally. It is rained out of the atmosphere and gets into the streams and rivers. Bacteria pick it up and convert it to methylmercury. Then it moves up the food chain to the large, predatory fish, and they can be pretty concentrated. Tuna is an example, as is swordfish and shark. As you may know, the government has set limits on how much fish pregnant women should eat, based on this, because mercury in a pregnant woman's body tends to go to the brain of the fetus. I think that if you Google on the power companies in your area, you will be able to find out where the coal-fired plants are in your area. In normal operation, nuclear plants put out much less pollution to the environment than do coal-fired plants. They also don't release carbon dioxide, which many people believe is causing global warming. The issues are preventing reactor accidents, which could release radioactive materisl, and disposal of the spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste, which is of much less volume than the ashes from coal plants, but is much more radioactive. Rich > > Rich, > The more time I spend here, the more I realize I don't know! I was not aware that coal-fired power plants released mercury into the environment. How can that be legal? Are these type of power plants common? Do you know how I can find out if I live near any of them? I was a special ed major in college (before I changed my major to nursing during my fourth year- student teaching-long story), so the autism connection is near and dear to my heart. > Once again, thanks for the info, > Dawn > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 On Mar 15, 2006, at 4:17 PM, rvankonynen wrote: > In normal operation, nuclear plants put out much less pollution to > the environment than do coal-fired plants. They also don't release > carbon dioxide, which many people believe is causing global > warming. The issues are preventing reactor accidents, which could > release radioactive materisl, and disposal of the spent nuclear fuel > and nuclear waste, which is of much less volume than the ashes from > coal plants, but is much more radioactive. Rich, this is way off-topic for the list, but I'm studying energy issues in school right now, and am fascinated by the potential for the new generation of pebble-bed reactors (which apparently have the potential to eliminate or at least greatly reduce most of the problems you noted above). I've got a few questions, which it occurs to me that you might be able to answer. Mind if we chat about this off-list? Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Kurt, From my own personal experience - my apprehensions, and comprehensions - I believe that this could very well indeed be the case. paul > > > > , > > You mention nuclear waste. It got me to thinking, do you know if > anyone has done a geographical study of CFS and fibro patients? Is > there any kind of trend based on nuclear power plants? I ask > because I live in Toledo, OH. If you aren't familiar, we have 2 > large nuclear power plants within a 50(?) mile radius. ( Bessy > and sburg). I just wonder if this could be in any way related > to my illness. > > Thanks, > > Dawn > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with > each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any > treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Marcia, Having my gold fillings (which also contained iridium btw) removed really helped me considerably. I believe iridium is used in cell phones. At any rate, the difference I felt was remarkable after having them removed. I only now have holes in my mouth and I feel great. paul > > I have thought about that too, not just mercury but the other tonage of metals in my mouth in crowns, I think I 'could be' a cell tower, much less be affected by one :-/ > > Marcia > RE: Re: cell phones > > > This is a very interesting study (the second one about environmental > mercury release and Autism). Could increased mercury cause increased > sensitivity to non-ionizing radiation such as the microwaves from cell > phones? That could explain a lot about PWC being EMF sensitive. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Dawn, I read a very interesting book a number of years ago called " Nuclear Witnesses. " It gives an insiders look at how lax these nuclear plants really are. In chapter four of the book, an expert in this field, Dr. Gofman, speaks out. As you can see from the following, he truly is an expert in this field. http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/nwJWG.html " The following is chapter 4 from the 1982 book Nuclear Witnesses, Insiders Speak Out and is an interview with Dr. Gofman detailing his personal experiences and knowledge regarding the nuclear establishment. Dr. Gofman is a Professor Emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley (Ph.D. in nuclear-physical chemistry and an M.D.) who was the first Director of the Biomedical Research Division of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory from 1963-65 and one of nine Associate Directors at the Lab from 1963-1969. He was involved in the Manhattan Project and is a co-discoverer of Uranium-232, Plutonium- 232, Uranium-233, and Plutonium-233, and of slow and fast neutron fissionability of Uranium-233. He also was a co-inventor of the urnayl acetate and columbium oxide processes for plutonium separation. He has taught in the radioisotope and radiobiology fields from the 1950s at least up into the 1980s, and has done research in radiochemistry, macromoloecules, lipoprotiens, coronary heart disease, arterioscleroisis, trace element determination, x-ray spectroscopy, chromosomes and cancer and radioation hazards. Starting in 1969 he began to challenge the AEC claim that there was a " safe threshold " of radiation below which no adverse health effects could be detected. " At any rate, given his credentials, I believe that we can believe him when he states: " Licensing a nuclear power plant is in my view, licensing random premeditated murder. First of all, when you license a plant, you know what you're doing--so it's premeditated. You can't say, " I didn't know. " Second, the evidence on radiation-producing cancer is beyond doubt. I've worked fifteen years on it [as of 1982], and so have many others. It is not a question any more: radiation produces cancer, and the evidence is good all the way down to the lowest doses. " Regards, paul doyon > > , > You mention nuclear waste. It got me to thinking, do you know if anyone has done a geographical study of CFS and fibro patients? Is there any kind of trend based on nuclear power plants? I ask because I live in Toledo, OH. If you aren't familiar, we have 2 large nuclear power plants within a 50(?) mile radius. ( Bessy and sburg). I just wonder if this could be in any way related to my illness. > Thanks, > Dawn > > > > Rich, I was just curious - since you have worked with nuclear waste - if you were familiar with the symptoms of radiation poisoning, e.g. people working in nuclear power plants who were exposed to an inordinate amount of radiation or people that were exposed to nuclear plant accidents like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. (I understand that in the later case there was a cover-up about the effects - e.g. deformed fetuses, etc.) I guess what I am getting at here is whether there is any similarity here with the symptoms of CFS? peace, paul > > It's the future of Hotmail: Try Windows Live Mail beta > http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en- us > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 , Do you believe that all fillings are harmful, despite the date they were put in? I have heard much controversy regarding mercury fillings, but I thought that was outlawed a long time ago. At 28, I didn't think any fillings I have could be harmful. -Dawn Marcia,> > Having my gold fillings (which also contained iridium btw) removed > really helped me considerably. I believe iridium is used in cell > phones. At any rate, the difference I felt was remarkable after > having them removed. I only now have holes in my mouth and I feel > great.> > paul It's the future, it's here, and it's free: Windows Live Mail beta http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en-us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Rich, Is there a test available for diabetes insipidus? I am constantly thirsty (I drink about a gallon of water a day), constantly peeing, get dizzy, light headed and nauseated if I can't drink, have had a positive tilt table test... I am just wondering if this couldn't be a missing piece for me. Is there any recognized treatment for it? Thanks, Dawn His idea is this: It is known that many PWCs, as part of their > illness, have central diabetes insipidus (not the same as the more > common diabetes mellitus). In central diabetes insipidus, the > hypothalamus does not put out enough arginine vasopressin (aka > antiduretic hormone). He believes this is a result of the Biotoxin > Pathway that he has developed to describe the effects in genetically > susceptible people of disorders in which there are biotoxins. This is > described in his book Mold Warriors, and I won't go into his whole > theory. I have other views about why the hypothalamus doesn't put out > enough vasopressin in many cases of CFS in which there is not a > biotoxin issue (i.e. glutathione depletion). It's the future, it's here, and it's free: Windows Live Mail beta http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en-us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, Dawn. I conquered ME/CFS related diabetes insipidus. Check out my post at message#90019 by punching in this number in the box above for this and hitting " GO " . I think it answers completely what you're asking of Rich here. " Dawn Munn " <dawnmunn@...> wrote: > > Rich, > > Is there a test available for diabetes insipidus? I am constantly thirsty (I drink about a gallon of water a day), constantly peeing, get dizzy, light headed and nauseated if I can't drink, have had a positive tilt table test... I am just wondering if this couldn't be a missing piece for me. Is there any recognized treatment for it? > > Thanks, > Dawn \ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Hi, Dawn. Yes, there are tests for diabetes insipidus. The older, more brutal one is to have the person stop drinking water (water deprivation test), and then monitor the osmolality of their urine as time goes by (that's basically how much salts are dissolved in the urine), and then take a blood sample after a while and measure the osmolality of that. If the person has diabetes insipidus, the urine will have low osmolality, and it will stay low, while the osmolality of the blood will rise. Then they give the person some desmopressin, either as a nose spray or orally, and measure the osmolality of the urine again. If it's central diabetes insipidus, the osmolality of the urine will rise. The kindler, gentler approach is to measure the level of vasopressin in the blood. If it's low, the person has central diabetes insipidus. Is there a treatment? Yes, a drug called desmopressin (aka DDAVP), which is a synthetic form of vasopressin. It is modified from the natural versiona so that it will stay in the blood longer, and also so that it will not raise the blood pressure, as the natural vasopressin will. It is given as a nose spray or an oral pill. You have to continue to use it every day, with dosage and frequency matched to what you need. In CFS, people have also tried eating more salt, and that will help to hold some more water in the blood. There's also a drug called Florinef, but I don't think it's been very successful in CFS. In the long run, the best treatment is to fix whatever is wrong in the hypothalamus. I suspect that in many PWCs, that's glutathione depletion, and that's what just wrote to you about. His case gives me a lot of hope that this is one more problem in CFS that will be taken care of by raising the glutathione level back up. Rich > > Rich, > > Is there a test available for diabetes insipidus? I am constantly thirsty (I drink about a gallon of water a day), constantly peeing, get dizzy, light headed and nauseated if I can't drink, have had a positive tilt table test... I am just wondering if this couldn't be a missing piece for me. Is there any recognized treatment for it? > > Thanks, > Dawn > > His idea is this: It is known that many PWCs, as part of their > illness, have central diabetes insipidus (not the same as the more > common diabetes mellitus). In central diabetes insipidus, the > hypothalamus does not put out enough arginine vasopressin (aka > antiduretic hormone). He believes this is a result of the Biotoxin > Pathway that he has developed to describe the effects in genetically > susceptible people of disorders in which there are biotoxins. This is > described in his book Mold Warriors, and I won't go into his whole > theory. I have other views about why the hypothalamus doesn't put out > enough vasopressin in many cases of CFS in which there is not a > biotoxin issue (i.e. glutathione depletion). > > > > It's the future, it's here, and it's free: Windows Live Mail beta > http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en- us > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 Dawn, I had my amalgam fillings removed about two years ago. Before that I was having a number of health problems which I attributed to the mercury. Then I had hybrid (ceramic and resin blend) put in and they made me really sick. They contained methyl methacrylate btw. So I had them replaced by a so-called " Biological " dentist. He was a super nice guy but the glass-ionomer he put in my mouth made me extremely sick. I was nauseous for 10 months. They contained aluminum-flouride, silica, and polyacrylic acid. I finally had these replaced with Gold but after I got CFS I had a strong feeling that the Gold feelings were part of the problem - and they were in that they were acting as antennas for the microwaves. When I went to see my current doctor, Dr. Yayama and he used his Zero Search machine on me, he told me that I had mercury, lead, aluminum, and resin in the area of my right sternum so... one would assume that all this stuff had disolved in my mouth and deposited in this area. Personally, I believe anything that is artificial is probably not going to be good to put into your mouth. I did have my one root canal replaced with a material named Endocal (sold by Biodent) which is a very natural material. I had them ship a sample to my dentist here in Japan and they love the product. According to their bioresonance machine there is nothing else that I am compatible with. I have tried to get some DiamondLite but haven't had much luck. But all I can say is that I feel fine without having anything kind of artificial material in my mouth and maybe that is best - in spite of the conventional dental wisdom. Peace, paul > > , > Do you believe that all fillings are harmful, despite the date they were put in? I have heard much controversy regarding mercury fillings, but I thought that was outlawed a long time ago. At 28, I didn't think any fillings I have could be harmful. > -Dawn > > > Marcia,> > Having my gold fillings (which also contained iridium btw) removed > really helped me considerably. I believe iridium is used in cell > phones. At any rate, the difference I felt was remarkable after > having them removed. I only now have holes in my mouth and I feel > great.> > paul > > > > > > > It's the future, it's here, and it's free: Windows Live Mail beta > http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en- us > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 Dawn, I was diagnosed with DI by Dr Cheney. I went to my Endo doc and was given a test to confirm ( the test is miserable). If positive, you would inject an antidiuretic hormone called DDAVP. You would need weekly blood draws for sodium levels. L On Mar 15, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Dawn Munn wrote: > Rich, > > Is there a test available for diabetes insipidus? I am constantly > thirsty (I drink about a gallon of water a day), constantly peeing, > get dizzy, light headed and nauseated if I can't drink, have had a > positive tilt table test...  I am just wondering if this couldn't be > a missing piece for me. Is there any recognized treatment for it? > > Thanks, > Dawn > > His idea is this: It is known that many PWCs, as part of their > > illness, have central diabetes insipidus (not the same as the more > > common diabetes mellitus). In central diabetes insipidus, the > > hypothalamus does not put out enough arginine vasopressin (aka > > antiduretic hormone). He believes this is a result of the Biotoxin > > Pathway that he has developed to describe the effects in genetically > > susceptible people of disorders in which there are biotoxins. This is > > described in his book Mold Warriors, and I won't go into his whole > > theory. I have other views about why the hypothalamus doesn't put out > > enough vasopressin in many cases of CFS in which there is not a > > biotoxin issue (i.e. glutathione depletion). > > > > It's the future, it's here, and it's free: Windows Live Mail beta > http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en-us > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2007 Report Share Posted March 28, 2007 Dear Turk, I asked my husband about the cell phone business. He said that as long as the " magnets " are 12 " away there should be no problem. We have a cell phone and he uses it on his right ear. My husband has had his device since 2000 and so far he has not had any problems with electronic fields. But, we are never in subways!!! Jeanette King Boynton Beach, FL --- TURK <goturk1@...> wrote: > Hello everyone; > I have not posted in a while. I hope all is well. > First of all I would like to hear from all the older > members(members that have been here longer). Just > check in and say hello so that I know you are all > ok. I haven't heard from you guys and gals in a > while. Secondly My biggest worry is when i take the > subway in the morning and having somebody right > behind me and playing a game on their cell phone. > Subway tends to get very crowded sometimes so i > could get awfully close to these cellphones. Any > thoughts? > Regards. > TURK > > Becca <beccageo1980@...> wrote: > > I would like to have OnStar in my device so the > little voice could tell me which way to turn, or > warn me not to step in " that " or alert me to the > impending meeting with some jerk, or whisper the > perfect excuse why I cannot possibly have lunch with > said jerk, ever. I would like to download books to > listen to when standing in the DMV line or at the > grocery, music, the weather. And I would love for it > to tell me that I just might be heading for a zap > and to go sit down somewhere. > Becca > > ph Schmidt <glua.joe@...> wrote: > Thanks for the info on battery replacement. I > was trying to make a funny at > the end of a serious discussion on our favorite > topic of insurance > companies. I guess it looked too much like a real > question. Sorry! > > I know that I will be back in the hospital for a > replacement someday. Maybe > by then they will have a replacement for coumadin so > I don't have to spend a > week on an IV waiting for my coumadin level to be > high enough to leave the > hospital. I think I was in the hospital for eight > days when they put in the > ICD. > > Has anyone had their ICD replaced when they were > taking blood thinners? > > I have a mechanical heart valve and they keep my > blood really thin so I > don't get a clot on the valve which might break > loose and cause a stroke or > heart attack. > > I get the impression that the doctors would love to > have a replacement for > coumadin because of all the problems it causes. > > Sorry for the confusion. I should know not to mix > jokes with serious > topics. I guess my jokes aren't really that funny! > Will the OnStarICD > allow my wife to track me down when I am taking a > long walk? > > Joe Schmidt > > God Loves Us All > > Re: ICD replacements > > Being able to switch out batteries is a dream we > have ALL had... but > it will likely never happen. The ENTIRE device must > be swapped out. > Rationale is good: Getting a new device about every > half decade is A > PLUS... as we get newer devices with more features, > such as improved > diagnostics, better record keeping and a broader > spectrum of > " therapies " requiring fewer full blown 700 volt > zaps. Now... many can > do everything almost as good as placing a call to > your doc when your > heart starts to flutter. Next year... I expect to > see an OnStarICD > interface! > > I am now on ICD#4... having gone through 3 > replacements in 12 years. > First time, went into pre-op after my noon:30 soap > (Y & R) ... and drove > self home in time to watch 6PM news! > > Last time... went into pre-op at 11AM... on way home > at 2PM. > > Unless you need a lead replacement... or have > special circumstances, > it is usually quick in and out. (guess that should > read out and in) > > Please visit the Zapper homepage at > http://www.ZapLife.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2007 Report Share Posted March 28, 2007 Dear Turk, I asked my husband about the cell phone business. He said that as long as the " magnets " are 12 " away there should be no problem. We have a cell phone and he uses it on his right ear. My husband has had his device since 2000 and so far he has not had any problems with electronic fields. But, we are never in subways!!! Jeanette King Boynton Beach, FL --- TURK <goturk1@...> wrote: > Hello everyone; > I have not posted in a while. I hope all is well. > First of all I would like to hear from all the older > members(members that have been here longer). Just > check in and say hello so that I know you are all > ok. I haven't heard from you guys and gals in a > while. Secondly My biggest worry is when i take the > subway in the morning and having somebody right > behind me and playing a game on their cell phone. > Subway tends to get very crowded sometimes so i > could get awfully close to these cellphones. Any > thoughts? > Regards. > TURK > > Becca <beccageo1980@...> wrote: > > I would like to have OnStar in my device so the > little voice could tell me which way to turn, or > warn me not to step in " that " or alert me to the > impending meeting with some jerk, or whisper the > perfect excuse why I cannot possibly have lunch with > said jerk, ever. I would like to download books to > listen to when standing in the DMV line or at the > grocery, music, the weather. And I would love for it > to tell me that I just might be heading for a zap > and to go sit down somewhere. > Becca > > ph Schmidt <glua.joe@...> wrote: > Thanks for the info on battery replacement. I > was trying to make a funny at > the end of a serious discussion on our favorite > topic of insurance > companies. I guess it looked too much like a real > question. Sorry! > > I know that I will be back in the hospital for a > replacement someday. Maybe > by then they will have a replacement for coumadin so > I don't have to spend a > week on an IV waiting for my coumadin level to be > high enough to leave the > hospital. I think I was in the hospital for eight > days when they put in the > ICD. > > Has anyone had their ICD replaced when they were > taking blood thinners? > > I have a mechanical heart valve and they keep my > blood really thin so I > don't get a clot on the valve which might break > loose and cause a stroke or > heart attack. > > I get the impression that the doctors would love to > have a replacement for > coumadin because of all the problems it causes. > > Sorry for the confusion. I should know not to mix > jokes with serious > topics. I guess my jokes aren't really that funny! > Will the OnStarICD > allow my wife to track me down when I am taking a > long walk? > > Joe Schmidt > > God Loves Us All > > Re: ICD replacements > > Being able to switch out batteries is a dream we > have ALL had... but > it will likely never happen. The ENTIRE device must > be swapped out. > Rationale is good: Getting a new device about every > half decade is A > PLUS... as we get newer devices with more features, > such as improved > diagnostics, better record keeping and a broader > spectrum of > " therapies " requiring fewer full blown 700 volt > zaps. Now... many can > do everything almost as good as placing a call to > your doc when your > heart starts to flutter. Next year... I expect to > see an OnStarICD > interface! > > I am now on ICD#4... having gone through 3 > replacements in 12 years. > First time, went into pre-op after my noon:30 soap > (Y & R) ... and drove > self home in time to watch 6PM news! > > Last time... went into pre-op at 11AM... on way home > at 2PM. > > Unless you need a lead replacement... or have > special circumstances, > it is usually quick in and out. (guess that should > read out and in) > > Please visit the Zapper homepage at > http://www.ZapLife.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.