Guest guest Posted May 28, 2004 Report Share Posted May 28, 2004 I know what you're talking about, Dottie. Most lawyers are silver spoonfed ambulance chasing wimps who don't give one iota for helping people. There are no more brave lawyers out there who have the brains or the cajones to go up against the crooked gavel thumpers who work for the government and the corporations. It's a damned shame. There is no justice anymore. Most doctors are no better. My pulmonologist deserted me when the owner of the medical group told him not to get involved. I'm not done yet. I'm just beginning to fight - after 5 years and some new information that should break my statute of limitations. Barth TOXIC MOLD SURVEY: www.presenting.net/sbs/sbssurvey.html --- d> I am going to post a link of a recent piece of news, as an example of what = d> we d> are up against. They talk about lawyers taking advantage of people's fears= d> , d> trying to get cases, but in reality I could hardly find any lawyers interes= d> ted in d> even taking my case, and not because I didn't have good evidence, but the d> litagation is such a new field and can be expensive, so attorneys are not s= d> o d> willing to go up against this emerging field, as it can go either way. Thi= d> s is d> definitely such untrue propoganda. Most attorneys don't take mold cases, a= d> t d> least here in the Northeast, an if even contacted a few out of state. I th= d> ink that d> the insurance industry is behind such news. d> < BR><http://houston.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2004/05/24/ d> daily32.html?jst= b_ln_hl>> d> Judi d> FAIR USE NOTICE: d> This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance d> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material d> as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior d> interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted d> material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. d> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2004 Report Share Posted May 28, 2004 I know what you're talking about, Dottie. Most lawyers are silver spoonfed ambulance chasing wimps who don't give one iota for helping people. There are no more brave lawyers out there who have the brains or the cajones to go up against the crooked gavel thumpers who work for the government and the corporations. It's a damned shame. There is no justice anymore. Most doctors are no better. My pulmonologist deserted me when the owner of the medical group told him not to get involved. I'm not done yet. I'm just beginning to fight - after 5 years and some new information that should break my statute of limitations. Barth TOXIC MOLD SURVEY: www.presenting.net/sbs/sbssurvey.html --- d> I am going to post a link of a recent piece of news, as an example of what = d> we d> are up against. They talk about lawyers taking advantage of people's fears= d> , d> trying to get cases, but in reality I could hardly find any lawyers interes= d> ted in d> even taking my case, and not because I didn't have good evidence, but the d> litagation is such a new field and can be expensive, so attorneys are not s= d> o d> willing to go up against this emerging field, as it can go either way. Thi= d> s is d> definitely such untrue propoganda. Most attorneys don't take mold cases, a= d> t d> least here in the Northeast, an if even contacted a few out of state. I th= d> ink that d> the insurance industry is behind such news. d> < BR><http://houston.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2004/05/24/ d> daily32.html?jst= b_ln_hl>> d> Judi d> FAIR USE NOTICE: d> This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance d> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material d> as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior d> interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted d> material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. d> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.